Morrison & Foerster LLP - Private Surgeon General, Class Action Defender

425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2482, United States

  • (415) 268-7000
  • (415) 268-7522

Pom Wonderful Drops Ninth Circuit Appeal of State Claims Filed Against Coca-Cola

On September 19, 2014, Pom Wonderful, LLC dropped its Ninth Circuit appeal of a ruling that dismissed its state deceptive advertising and unfair competition claims against Coca-Cola, a sibling case to a recent Supreme Court…more
| Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Civil Procedure, Communications & Media Law, Conflict of Laws, Products Liability

Vermont GMO Food Labeling Law Challengers Seek Preliminary Injunction

In the court battle to have Vermont’s genetically modified organism (GMO) food labeling law (Act 120) overturned, plaintiff trade associations filed a motion for preliminary injunction on September 11, 2014, seeking to enjoin…more
| Agriculture, Communications & Media Law, Consumer Protection, Products Liability

Plaintiffs Sent Back to the Drawing Board in Mislabeling Suit Over “All Natural” and “Fat Free” Claims on Frito-Lay Rold Gold Pretzels

Judge Samuel Conti of the Northern District of California recently issued another blow to class action plaintiffs—this time at the motion to dismiss stage—in Figy v. Frito-Lay N. Am., Inc., Case No. 13-3988-SC (N.D. Cal. Aug…more
| Civil Procedure, Civil Remedies, Communications & Media Law, Consumer Protection, Products Liability

Class Action Suit Against Sunflower Seed Manufacturer Dismissed as Implausible

In a recent food mislabeling case, Judge Manuel Real of the Central District of California dismissed a proposed class action lawsuit finding the plaintiffs’ claims to be implausible as a matter of law. Last year, Judge Real and…more
| Civil Procedure, Communications & Media Law, Consumer Protection, Products Liability

Class Certified in Homeopathic Products Case

The plaintiffs’ theory of harm drove a recent decision from the Central District of California certifying a nationwide class of purchasers of ten homeopathic products. Allen v. Hyland’s Inc., Case No. 12-01150 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 1,…more
| Civil Procedure, Civil Remedies, Communications & Media Law, Consumer Protection, Products Liability

California Federal Court Follows Third Circuit in Denying Class Certification Based on Lack of Receipts in Kitty Litter Case

Judge Conti of the Northern District of California recently issued a decision denying class certification in a consumer class action against The Clorox Company involving claims arising from the marketing and advertising of Fresh…more
| Civil Procedure, Communications & Media Law, Consumer Protection, Products Liability

More Good News for Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: California Supreme Court Upholds Class Action Waiver in Employment Dispute, Except for Representative PAGA Claims

On June 23, the California Supreme Court issued its first opinion upholding a class action waiver following the U.S. Supreme Court’s seminal decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740 (2011). Iskanian v. CLS…more
| Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), Civil Procedure, Commercial Law & Contracts, Conflict of Laws, Labor & Employment Law

Phelps v. Coca-Cola: Orange Juice Misbranding “Copycat” Suit Finds Its Way Into State Court

Copycat lawsuits appear to be increasing in food labeling cases. The Coca-Cola Company (“Coca-Cola”) is the latest company to be targeted with a copycat suit in California. A putative class action, Phelps v. The Coca-Cola Co.,…more
| Communications & Media Law, Consumer Protection, Products Liability

Receiving the Benefit of the Bargain: Reconciling Judge King’s Class Certification Rulings in Forcellati and Caldera

Within one week’s time, Judge George H. King, Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, came down on opposite sides of the class certification coin, granting class certification in Forcellati…more
| Civil Procedure, Civil Remedies, Communications & Media Law, Consumer Protection, Products Liability

Northern District Judge Tosses “Evaporated Cane Juice” Food Misbranding Claims Against Whole Foods

On March 31, 2014 Judge Edward J. Davila in the Northern District of California partially dismissed a lawsuit against Whole Foods Market alleging misleading labeling of its in-house “Everyday Value” products. The plaintiff…more
| Civil Procedure, Communications & Media Law, Consumer Protection, Products Liability

Proposition 65 Hot Button Issue: Caramel Coloring in Soft Drinks

Beverage companies PepsiCo and Goya face a spate of class action lawsuits relating to the caramel coloring in their soda drinks. In January, Consumer Reports, an independent product testing organization, released a report…more
| Civil Procedure, Communications & Media Law, Environmental Law, Consumer Protection, Products Liability

Pom Wonderful Brings Food Labeling Dispute To The U.S. Supreme Court: When Are Claims Based On Allegedly Improper Product Labeling Barred By The Food, Drug, And Cosmetic Act?

A long-standing false advertising dispute between beverage companies Pom Wonderful and Coca-Cola has reached the United States Supreme Court and carries far-reaching implications for other food labeling litigation. On January…more
| Civil Procedure, Communications & Media Law, Conflict of Laws, Consumer Protection

FDA to Revisit “Evaporated Cane Juice” Draft Guidance

Earlier this month, the FDA announced that it would reopen the comment period on its draft guidance for the industry concerning use of the term “evaporated cane juice” (ECJ). Draft Guidance for Industry on Ingredients Declared…more
| Administrative Law, Communications & Media Law, Conflict of Laws

Judge Koh Tosses Restitution and Disgorgement Claims in Bumble Bee Class Action

In one of the first summary judgment rulings in the onslaught of food mislabeling and misbranding class actions, Judge Lucy Koh of the Northern District of California tossed the plaintiff’s restitution and disgorgement claims. …more
| Civil Remedies, Communications & Media Law, Constitutional Law, Consumer Protection

Pom Wonderful Case Against Coca-Cola Heads to the High Court

The United States Supreme Court has decided to wade into a battle between POM Wonderful LLC and Coca-Cola Co. over whether Coke’s labeling of its Minute Maid pomegranate-blueberry juice blend violates the Lanham Act’s…more
| Civil Procedure, Communications & Media Law, Consumer Protection
Showing 1-15 of 62 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 5
Areas of Practice
  • Class Action
  • Environmental Law
  • Health
  • Litigation
  • Products Liability
Locations
Other U.S. Locations
  • California
  • Colorado
  • D.C.
  • New York
  • Virginia
Other Countries
  • Belgium
  • China
  • Hong Kong
  • Japan
  • United Kingdom
Number of Attorneys

1,000+ Attorneys

This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.