Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Author

Latest Publications

Donald R. Banowit

The Interface Between District Court Litigation and Contested Office Proceedings under the AIA: Motions to Stay

What is the standard for deciding a motion to stay in view of a contested office proceeding? Courts typically consider: (1) whether a stay will unduly prejudice or present a clear tactical disadvantage to the nonmoving…more

See All Updates »

Salvador M. Bezos

Another Patent Acceleration Option: USPTO Initiates Glossary Pilot Program

Beginning June 2, 2014, patent applicants have another vehicle to accelerate examination of a newly filed patent application – add a glossary. The United States Patent and Trademark Office launched today a new pilot…more

Patent Applications, Patents, USPTO

See All Updates »

Lori M. Brandes, Ph.D.

Federal Circuit Grants Patent Term Adjustment After Allowance When Continued Examination Requested

On January 15, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided Novartis v. Lee (No. 2013-1160, -1179), holding that time spent in “continued examination” is excluded from a patent term adjustment even where the…more

Novartis, Patent Term Adjustment, Patents, Request for Continued Examination

See All Updates »

Paul Calvo, Ph.D.

USPTO Issues New Subject Matter Eligibility Examination Guidelines for Claims Involving Laws of Nature, Natural Principles, Natural Phenomena, and/or Natural Products

On March 4, 2014, the USPTO issued a Guidance memorandum for examination of subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 in view of AMP v. Myriad (2013) and Mayo v. Prometheus (2012). Under the new guidelines, the examiner…more

AMP v Myriad, Mayo v. Prometheus, Patent-Eligible Subject Matter, Patents, USPTO

See All Updates »

MIchele Cimbala

Changes to Implement the Patent Law Treaty

On October 21, 2013 the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a Notice of Final Rulemaking to revise its rules of practice to reflect the Patent Law Treaty and title II of the Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act…more

Filing Deadlines, Filing Requirements, Patent Applications, Patent Law Treaty, Patent Term Adjustment

See All Updates »

David K.S. Cornwell

Design Patent Case Digest: ATAS International, Inc. v. Centria

Decision Date: September 24, 2013 - Court: Patent Trial and Appeal Board - Patents: D527,834 - Holding: ATAS’s petition to institute inter partes review is DENIED. Opinion: ATAS International, Inc. filed…more

Design Patent, Inter Partes Review Proceedings, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patents

See All Updates »

John Covert

Patent Filing Considerations Under the AIA on the Eve of March 16th

March 16, 2013 is rapidly approaching. This date is significant because it is the effective date of Section 3 of the American Invents Act (AIA). Section 3 of AIA includes the first-inventor-to-file provisions (FITF). Most of…more

America Invents Act, Effective Filing Date, Filing Deadlines, First-to-File, Patent Reform

See All Updates »

Deborah Sterling, Ph. D.

America Invents Act: Inter Partes Review

What is an inter partes review? An inter partes review (“IPR”) enables a third party to challenge one or more claims in an issued patent at the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“Office”). IPR was designed to…more

America Invents Act, Burden of Proof, Infringement, Inter Partes Reexamination, Inter Partes Review Proceedings

See All Updates »

Eldora Ellison, Ph. D.

America Invents Act: Inter Partes Review

What is an inter partes review? An inter partes review (“IPR”) enables a third party to challenge one or more claims in an issued patent at the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“Office”). IPR was designed to…more

America Invents Act, Burden of Proof, Infringement, Inter Partes Reexamination, Inter Partes Review Proceedings

See All Updates »

Tracy-Gene G. Durkin

Mark It to Market - January 2014

In This Issue: - How to Use the OLYMPICS/Rings, SUPER BOWL, and MARCH MADNESS Trademarks (Hint: Not Without Permission!) - Trademark Clearinghouse Registrations - Change to the D.O.T. Rule - Generic Top Level Domains –…more

gTLD, March Madness, Olympics, Sunrise Periods, Super Bowl

See All Updates »

Robert W. Esmond, Ph.D.

The Supreme Court Nixes Claims to Isolated Genomic DNA

The U.S. Supreme Court decided today that claims to isolated genomic DNA are not patentable subject matter and thus invalid. This decision rendered invalid patent claims owned by Myriad Genetics as well as thousands of patent…more

AMP v Myriad, DNA, Gene Patenting, Human Genes, Myriad

See All Updates »

Jeremiah Frueauf

AIA Technical Corrections Bill Signed Into Law

President Obama signed into law H.R. 6621 on January 14, 2013, enacting a number of technical corrections to the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act and title 35, United States Code. In addition to correcting a number of scrivener’s…more

America Invents Act, Dead Zones, Declaration, Derivation Proceeding, First-to-File

See All Updates »

Miklos Gaszner, Ph.D.

USPTO Issues New Subject Matter Eligibility Examination Guidelines for Claims Involving Laws of Nature, Natural Principles, Natural Phenomena, and/or Natural Products

On March 4, 2014, the USPTO issued a Guidance memorandum for examination of subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 in view of AMP v. Myriad (2013) and Mayo v. Prometheus (2012). Under the new guidelines, the examiner…more

AMP v Myriad, Mayo v. Prometheus, Patent-Eligible Subject Matter, Patents, USPTO

See All Updates »

Dallin Glen

ITC Says the Importation of Digital Data Can Constitute Importation of a Patent-Infringing Product

On April 3, 2014, the United States International Trade Commission affirmed that the importation of digital data via electronic transmission can constitute “importation” of a patent-infringing product in violation of Section 337…more

ALJ, Cease and Desist, Digital Downloads, Electronic Data Transmissions, Imports

See All Updates »

Jorge Goldstein, Ph.D.

SCOTUS: Human Genes Cannot Be Patented. Is This the End or Beginning of Genetic Research?

For a Legal Perspective on today's much-anticipated U.S. Supreme Court "Myriad" decision that naturally occuring substances are not patentable, we turned to IP attorneys writing on JD Supra..…more

AMP v Myriad, Biotechnology, DNA, Healthcare, Human Genes

See All Updates »

Lori Gordon

One Year Later: Observations From The First Year Of Contested Proceedings At The USPTO

The America Invents Act - September 16, 2013 marks the one-year anniversary of the implementation of the America Invents Act, and with it, Covered Business Method (CBM) and Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings. To date,…more

America Invents Act, Contested Proceedings, Inter Partes Review Proceedings, Patent Litigation, Patent Reform

See All Updates »

Richard Hadorn

Pending Petition for CBM Review Results in Litigation Stay

The stay provisions of America Invents Act § 18(b) related to covered business method patent review1 (“CBM review”) were recently applied in Market-Alerts Pty. Ltd. v. Bloomberg Fin. L.P. et al., C.A. No. 12-780-GMS (D. Del.)…more

America Invents Act, Burden of Litigation, Covered Business Method Patents, Infringement, Judicial Review

See All Updates »

J.T. Haran

Changes to Implement the Patent Law Treaty

On October 21, 2013 the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a Notice of Final Rulemaking to revise its rules of practice to reflect the Patent Law Treaty and title II of the Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act…more

Filing Deadlines, Filing Requirements, Patent Applications, Patent Law Treaty, Patent Term Adjustment

See All Updates »

Michelle Holoubek

12 Observations on Covered Business Method Review

CBM: When the America Invents Act (AIA) was passed in 2011, it ushered in a number of new post-grant options to challenge and defend patents at the United States Patent and Trademark Oce. One of these newly-created proceedings, …more

America Invents Act, Covered Business Method Patents, Patent Reform, Patents, Post-Grant Review

See All Updates »

Judith Kim

USPTO Issues New Subject Matter Eligibility Examination Guidelines for Claims Involving Laws of Nature, Natural Principles, Natural Phenomena, and/or Natural Products

On March 4, 2014, the USPTO issued a Guidance memorandum for examination of subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 in view of AMP v. Myriad (2013) and Mayo v. Prometheus (2012). Under the new guidelines, the examiner…more

AMP v Myriad, Mayo v. Prometheus, Patent-Eligible Subject Matter, Patents, USPTO

See All Updates »

Michael Messinger

Another Patent Acceleration Option: USPTO Initiates Glossary Pilot Program

Beginning June 2, 2014, patent applicants have another vehicle to accelerate examination of a newly filed patent application – add a glossary. The United States Patent and Trademark Office launched today a new pilot…more

Patent Applications, Patents, USPTO

See All Updates »

Mark Rygiel

Utility Patent Highlights from the IPO’s 2013 IP Record

The Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) releases an annual report containing statistics on patent activity in the United States and in the top five patent offices around the world. The 2013 IP Record draws on sources…more

Japan, Patent Applications, Patents, USPTO, Utility Patents

See All Updates »

H. Keeto Sabharwal

The Supreme Court Heightens Antitrust Scrutiny For ANDA Reverse Payment Agreements Between Pharmaceutical Companies

The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday ruled on the long-awaited FTC v. Actavis case concerning ANDA reverse payments, resolving a sharp circuit split. The Court held that settlement agreements that include reverse payments to end…more

ANDA, Antitrust Litigation, FTC, FTC v Actavis, Patent Infringement

See All Updates »

Timothy J. Shea

7 Intellectual Property Mistakes Startup Entrepreneurs Often Make

What’s the biggest mistake startup entrepreneurs make with respect to their intellectual property, and what can they do to fix it? That’s the question we recently put to IP attorneys writing on JD Supra, knowing that the…more

Business Formation, Copyright, First-to-File, Legal Perspectives, Patents

See All Updates »

Eric K. Steffe

Federal Circuit Grants Patent Term Adjustment After Allowance When Continued Examination Requested

On January 15, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided Novartis v. Lee (No. 2013-1160, -1179), holding that time spent in “continued examination” is excluded from a patent term adjustment even where the…more

Novartis, Patent Term Adjustment, Patents, Request for Continued Examination

See All Updates »

Jonathan M. Strang

The Interface Between District Court Litigation and Contested Office Proceedings under the AIA: Motions to Stay

What is the standard for deciding a motion to stay in view of a contested office proceeding? Courts typically consider: (1) whether a stay will unduly prejudice or present a clear tactical disadvantage to the nonmoving…more

See All Updates »

Monica Riva Talley

Mark It to Market - January 2014

In This Issue: - How to Use the OLYMPICS/Rings, SUPER BOWL, and MARCH MADNESS Trademarks (Hint: Not Without Permission!) - Trademark Clearinghouse Registrations - Change to the D.O.T. Rule - Generic Top Level Domains –…more

gTLD, March Madness, Olympics, Sunrise Periods, Super Bowl

See All Updates »

Jonathan Tuminaro

Federal Circuit issues opinion in Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade Commission

What’s at Stake? The panel majority held that exclusion orders under § 337 may not issue based on a theory of induced infringement where the direct infringement does not occur until after the articles are imported. The…more

Imports, Induced Infringement, ITC, Patent Infringement, Patents

See All Updates »

Dennies Varughese

The Supreme Court Heightens Antitrust Scrutiny For ANDA Reverse Payment Agreements Between Pharmaceutical Companies

The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday ruled on the long-awaited FTC v. Actavis case concerning ANDA reverse payments, resolving a sharp circuit split. The Court held that settlement agreements that include reverse payments to end…more

ANDA, Antitrust Litigation, FTC, FTC v Actavis, Patent Infringement

See All Updates »

Jon Wright

One Year Later: Observations From The First Year Of Contested Proceedings At The USPTO

The America Invents Act - September 16, 2013 marks the one-year anniversary of the implementation of the America Invents Act, and with it, Covered Business Method (CBM) and Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings. To date,…more

America Invents Act, Contested Proceedings, Inter Partes Review Proceedings, Patent Litigation, Patent Reform

See All Updates »

Daniel Yonan

ITC Says the Importation of Digital Data Can Constitute Importation of a Patent-Infringing Product

On April 3, 2014, the United States International Trade Commission affirmed that the importation of digital data via electronic transmission can constitute “importation” of a patent-infringing product in violation of Section 337…more

ALJ, Cease and Desist, Digital Downloads, Electronic Data Transmissions, Imports

See All Updates »

This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.