William Chapman – Julander, Brown, Bollard & Chapman

Merck v. Gnosis

Summary Judgment Reply - When Defendant's Advertising is More Aligned with the International Standard than Plaintiff's, that is not False Advertising!

This is a Response to a sur reply in a Lanham Act false advertising case in SDNY. Plaintiff, Merck Eprova, claimed that my client, Gnosis, S.p.A., caused an independent GRAS panel of experts to change the nomenclature in their…more
| Business Torts, Civil Procedure, Communications & Media Law, Science, Computers, & Technology
Contact

9110 Irvine Center Dr
Irvine, CA 92618, United States


Areas of Practice
  • Administrative Law
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
  • Antitrust & Trade Regulation
  • Appellate Practice
  • Business Torts
  • Civil Rights
  • Commercial Law & Contracts
  • Communications & Media Law
  • Construction Law
  • Finance & Banking
  • Insurance
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Personal Injury
  • Products Liability
  • Professional Malpractice
See more
This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.
×