Amazon

News & Analysis as of

Employment & Labor Update - Supreme Court Approves Employers’ Right To Conduct Security Screening Without Wage Liability

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court ruled that employers have no obligation to pay their employees for time spent undergoing security screenings when those screenings are not integral to the employees’ job duties. Busk et al. v....more

After-hours Time Spent by Employees for Required Security Checks Is Not Integral to the Employees’ Job and Not Compensable under...

In Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk et al., the United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously that workers who fill orders in Amazon.com warehouses need not be paid for the time they are required to spend waiting...more

The Employment Law Authority - December 2014

In This Issue: - Justices Issue Pro-Employer Rulling in FLSA Case - Ogletree Deakins Named A "Law Firm of the Year" - California Mandates Anti-Bullying Training for Supervisors - OFCCP Issues Final...more

Are Postliminary Activities No Longer Compensable after the Supreme Court's Decision this Week?

In a unanimous decision on December 9, 2014, the United States Supreme Court held that the time employees spent waiting to undergo and undergoing security screenings post-shift (approximately 25 minutes each day) is not...more

U.S. Supreme Court Rules that Security Screening Time is Non-Compensable Under Federal Law and The Portal-to-Portal Act

In a decision issued on Tuesday, December 9, 2014, the United States Supreme Court ruled that employees are not entitled to compensation under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) for the time they spend waiting to...more

Employment Alert: U.S. Supreme Court - Federal Wage Law Does not Apply to Wait Time for Security Screening of Employees

In Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk, et al. (Integrity), No. 13-433, the Supreme Court of the United States held the time spent by warehouse workers waiting to undergo and undergoing security screenings is not...more

Supreme Court Says Employers Do Not Have to Pay Employees for Time Spent in Security Checks

On Tuesday, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court concluded that federal wage and hour laws do not require employers to pay employees for time spent going through security checks after they complete their job tasks. In Integrity...more

What’s Next For Retailers After Integrity Staffing?

It is well-established that employees are responsible for a vast amount of inventory theft—or shrink—that retail employers experience on a daily basis. Recognizing this fact, retail employers utilize various loss prevention...more

Security Check-Out is Not "Compensable" Work Time, Supreme Court Says

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court handed a big win to contractors for Amazon.com. The Court unanimously held that time spent by employees in security screenings when exiting from warehouses after their work shifts did not...more

U.S. Supreme Court Decides Time Spent in the Security Screening Process Is Not Compensable Under the FLSA

The U.S. Supreme Court handed down a unanimous opinion on December 9, 2014, in Integrity Staffing Solutions Inc. v. Busk et al., ruling that employees' time spent waiting to undergo and undergoing post-shift security...more

U.S. Supreme Court Finds Post-Shift Security Checks Noncompensable in Integrity Staffing v. Busk, But Employers Shouldn’t Get Too...

The U.S. Supreme Court, in a rare unanimous decision earlier this week in Integrity Staffing Solutions v. Busk, held that time spent by warehouse employees at Amazon.com warehouses waiting to go through security checks at the...more

Is Compensation Owed for All Employer-Required Activities?

An employer requires a large number of its employees to spend (on average) between two and two and one-half hours per week performing certain activities prior to leaving the employer’s jobsite. The employees’ demand for...more

Supreme Court Decides No Pay Owed for Amazon Warehouse Security Checks

On December 9, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk, that Amazon warehouse employees were not entitled to pay for the time spent waiting to go through security checks at...more

Supreme Court Rejects Compensation For Antitheft Security Screenings, But Would A California Court Find Differently?

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held this week that time spent by employees going through a post-shift security screening is not compensable time. In a relatively brief and uncontroversial opinion, the Court found in...more

Supreme Court Confirms No Pay Required for Post-Shift Security Screenings

In a 9-0 decision issued yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court held that time spent by non-exempt workers waiting to undergo and undergoing security screenings before leaving their workplace at the end of their work day was not...more

Supreme Court Rules Employers Not Required To Pay Employees For Time Spent In Security Screenings

Yesterday the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Fair Labor Standards Act did not require employers to pay employees for time spent going through a security screening and waiting in line to be screened. Justice Thomas,...more

Better Warn Santa’s Elves—US Supreme Court Rules that Amazon Does Not Have to Pay Workers to Stand in Security Line at the End of...

Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that Amazon does not have to pay its temporary warehouse workers for the time that they spend waiting in line to go through security checks as they leave the facilities. The...more

Investment Trends in the Gaming Industry

Over the past decade, the gaming industry has evolved into one of the hottest sectors of mobile internet services. VentureBeat recently reported that in the trailing twelve months of Q3 2014, gaming accounted for $18 billion...more

Drone on Drones: “Amazon Air” Testing Takes Off in the U.K.

Last year, Amazon raised eyebrows in a now-famous announcement that it was considering launching a same-day delivery service for certain products through the air, using quadcopter drones. At the time, many in the tech and...more

Privacy in the Cloud: A Legal Framework for Moving Personal Data to the Cloud

For many companies, the main question about cloud computing is no longer whether to move their data to the “cloud,” but how they can accomplish this transition. Cloud (or Internet-based on-demand) computing involves a shift...more

What Is the Appropriate Market for Analyzing Amazon’s Alleged Power?

The current debate over whether Amazon holds the power of a monopolist or a monopsonist is likely to be narrowed to one question in a court room: What is the relevant product market that Amazon is allegedly dominating? Since...more

The Line Out of This Place Is as Long as the Amazon.com River

This month, the U.S. Supreme Court heard argument in a case that would seem to raise easy enough questions: When does an employee’s workday begin and end? What activities count as “work”? However, these questions have given...more

Could Amazon Possibly Be a Monopolist? (Updated) (Again)

Franklin Foer, at the New Republic, argues that the answer is yes. The alleged “crime”: predatory pricing — if not express, than at least in spirit....more

Labor & Employment E-Note - October 2014

In this Issue: - High Court Considers If Workers Waiting in Line Should Get Paid - Some States Putting Minimum Wage Battle on Ballot - U.S. Labor Department Promoting Paid Maternity Leave - EEOC...more

Alice in Wonderland: The Ongoing Impact of Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int’l on Computer-Implemented Inventions

On June 19, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int’l (Alice)[i]. In Alice, the Court held that several patents that pertained to a computerized platform for eliminating risk...more

84 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 4