News & Analysis as of

ANDA Hatch-Waxman

Where Can Hatch-Waxman and BPCIA Cases Stick After TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC?

by K&L Gates LLP on

Hatch-Waxman litigators are accustomed to cases with multiple generic drug company defendants. Brand drug company plaintiffs often sue multiple defendants in the same district court, even when those defendants are not...more

Allergan, Inc. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc.

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Allergan, Inc. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., 15-1455-WCB, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4545 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 12, 2017) (Bryson, J.). Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Restasis® (cyclosporine ophthalmic solution); U.S....more

Sanofi v. Lupin Atlantis Holdings SA

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Sanofi v. Lupin Atlantis Holdings SA, Civ. No. 15-415-RGA, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10653 (D. Del. Jan. 26, 2017) (Andrews, J.). Drug Product and U.S. Patent: Multaq® (dronedarone tablets); U.S. Patent No....more

Shire Development, LLC v. Mylan Pharms., Inc.

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Shire Development, LLC v. Mylan Pharms., Inc., No: 12-1190-T-36AEP, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11441 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 27, 2017) (Honeywell, J.). Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Lialda® (mesalamine); U.S. Patent...more

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC, Civ. No. 15-250-SLR, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12165 (D. Del. Jan. 30, 2017) (Robinson, J.). Drug Product and U.S. Patent: Nasonex® (mometasone furoate nasal...more

In re copaxone consolidated cases

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: In re copaxone consolidated cases, No. 14-1171-GMS (consolidated) 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12168 (D. Del. Jan. 30, 2017) (Sleet, J.). Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Copaxone® (prefilled syringes of...more

Par Pharm., Inc. v. Luitpold Pharms., Inc.

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Par Pharm., Inc. v. Luitpold Pharms., Inc., No. 16-2290 (WHW)(CLW), 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15050 (D.N.J. Feb. 1, 2017) (Walls, J.). Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Adrenalin® (epinephrine); U.S. Patents...more

AstraZeneca AB v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: AstraZeneca AB v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., 14-664-GMS, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14647 (D. Del. Feb. 2, 2017) (Sleet, J.). Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Onglyza® (saxagliptin) and Kombiglyze™ XR (saxaglibtin...more

Endo Pharma. Solutions Inc. v. Custopharm, Inc.

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Endo Pharma. Solutions Inc. v. Custopharm, Inc., 14-1422-SLR, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19035 (D. Del. Feb. 10, 2017) (Robinson, J.). Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Aveed® (testosterone undecanoate); U.S....more

Recro Gainesville LLC v. Actavis Labs. FL, Inc.

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Recro Gainesville LLC v. Actavis Labs. FL, Inc., Civ. No. 14-1118-GMS, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24428 (D. Del. Feb. 22, 2017) (Sleet, J.). Drug Product and U.S. Patent: Zohydro® ER (hydrocodone bitartrate...more

Apotex Inc. v. Alcon Research, Ltd.

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Apotex Inc. v. Alcon Research, Ltd., No. 16-3145-WTL-MJD, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27016 (S.D. Ind. Feb. 27, 2017) (Lawrence, J.). Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Pataday® (olopatadine); U.S. Patents Nos....more

Par’s Hatch-Waxman Claims Too Speculative and Discovery Requests Too Broad

by Foley & Lardner LLP on

The recent decision from the New Jersey District Court in Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Civ. No. 16-02290 (WHW)(CLW) (D.N.J. April 24, 2017) provides an interesting look at the boundaries of...more

Reckitt Benckiser LLC v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Reckitt Benckiser LLC v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., Civ. No. 14-1203-LPS, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31985 (D. Del. Mar. 6, 2017) (Stark, J.). Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Mucinex® DM (dextromethorphan...more

Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Breckenridge Pharm., Inc.

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Breckenridge Pharm., Inc., Civ. Nos. 14-1043-RGA, 14-1196-RGA, 14-1289-RGA, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46595 (D. Del. Mar. 28, 2017) (Andrews, J.)....more

Acorda Therapeutics Inc. v. Roxane Labs., Inc.

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Acorda Therapeutics Inc. v. Roxane Labs., Inc., 14-882-LPS, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48479 (D. Del. Mar. 31, 2017) (Stark, J.)....more

Eli Lilly and Co. v. Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc.

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Eli Lilly and Co. v. Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc., No. 2015-2067, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 555 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 12, 2017) (Circuit Judges Prost, Newman, and Dyk presiding; Opinion by Prost, C.J.) (Appeal from S.D....more

Federal Circuit Clarifies AIA On-Sale Bar Provision Applies Where Existence of Sale Is Public

by Polsinelli on

Yesterday, the Federal Circuit provided much-anticipated guidance on the scope of the America Invents Act’s “on-sale” bar provision. Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al., Nos. 2016-1284, 2016-1787...more

Cumberland Pharms. Inc. v. Mylan Institutional LLC

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Cumberland Pharms. Inc. v. Mylan Institutional LLC, Nos. 2016-1155, -1259, 846 F.3d 1213 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 26, 2017) (Circuit Judges Moore, Taranto, and Reyna presiding; Opinion by Taranto, J.) (appeal from N.D....more

Shire Development, LLC v. Watson Pharms., Inc.

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Shire Development, LLC v. Watson Pharms., Inc., No. 2016-1785, 848 F.3d 981 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 10, 2017) (Circuit Judges Prost, Taranto, and Hughes presiding; Opinion by Hughes, J.) (appeal from S.D. Fla.,...more

Speculation That FDA May Require a Formulation Change ≠ Infringement

by Locke Lord LLP on

Last month, we reported on the District of Delaware’s decision in Bayer Pharma AG et al. v. Watson Laboratories, Inc., C.A. No. 12-1726-LPS, 2016 WL 7468172 (D. Del. Dec. 28, 2016) which held that speculation of a...more

Second Circuit Declares That, to Survive Motions to Dismiss, Antitrust Allegations Require Factual Support for All “Necessary...

Last Wednesday, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals partially vacated the judgment of the district court in In re Actos End-Payor Antitrust Litigation. In doing so, the Second Circuit allowed only plaintiffs’ claims that...more

Moving From Everyday Dosing to Less Frequent Dosing is Obvious

In a consolidated Hatch-Waxman patent infringement action, a district court judge in Delaware recently found claims directed to a treatment for multiple sclerosis invalid as obvious....more

Patent Claims Directed to Treatment for Multiple Sclerosis Invalid as Obvious

In a consolidated Hatch-Waxman patent infringement action, a district court judge in Delaware recently found claims directed to a treatment for multiple sclerosis invalid as obvious....more

Endo Pharms. Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Endo Pharms. Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC, Civ Nos. 14-1382-RGA, 14-1389-RGA, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140112 (D. Del. Oct. 7, 2016) (Andrews, J.). Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Opana® ER (oxymorphone...more

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Hospira Inc.

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Hospira Inc., 14-cv-915-RGA, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139721 (D. Del. Oct. 7, 2016) (Andrews, J.). Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Invanz® (ertapenem); U.S. Patents Nos. 5,952,323...more

136 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 6
Cybersecurity

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.