News & Analysis as of

Biologics Pharmaceutical Industry

First U.S. Avastin and Herceptin Biosimilars

On Thursday, July 13, 2017, FDA’s Oncological Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) unanimously recommended approval of biosimilars of two blockbuster cancer drugs. The first, Amgen and Allergan’s ABP-215, is a proposed biosimilar...more

Bioverativ Files ITC Complaint Against CSL’s Idelvion® Alongside District Court Infringement Suit

by Goodwin on

In an earlier post, we discussed the recent rise in Section 337 proceedings against pharmaceutical products and medical devices at the International Trade Commission. Last week, Bioverativ, which markets the recombinant...more

Sandoz Inc. v Amgen Inc.

by Hodgson Russ LLP on

Artificial patent infringement occurs when certain types of approval applications are submitted to the U.S. Food And Drug Administration (the “FDA”). The U.S. Supreme Court recently considered a situation in which an...more

Supreme Court Decision Allows Faster Marketing of Biosimilars

On Monday, June 12, 2017, the United States Supreme Court in a unanimous decision held that manufacturers making biosimilars of biologic drugs did not have to wait until after gaining federal approval of the biosimilar to...more

Janssen and Celltrion: Remicade Biosimilar Patent Dance

by Knobbe Martens on

Janssen Biotech Inc. and Celltrion Healthcare have taken the next step over Janssen’s blockbuster arthritis biologic medicine Remicade (infliximab) and Celltrion’s biosimilar, as required by the Biologics Price Competition...more

ITC Section 337 – Quarterly Highlights

by Hogan Lovells on

SCOTUS Narrows Opportunity For ITC Section 337 Jurisdiction Over Imported Biosimilars Based On 180-Day Notice Provision - In Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., 794 F.3d 1347, 1357-58 (Fed. Cir. 2015), the Federal Circuit held that...more

New French Decree Clarifies the Scope of Biomedical Research, Pharmaceutical & Medical Device Update, Vol. IV, Issue III

by Jones Day on

French Decree n° 2017-884 of May 9, 2017, was adopted to implement certain provisions of the Legal Ordinance of June 16, 2016, with respect to biomedical research. Such research should now be referred to as "research...more

The Supreme Court Delivers a Win for Biosimilar Manufacturers in Sandoz v. Amgen

by BakerHostetler on

On June 12, 2017, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Sandoz v. Amgen, interpreting key provisions of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) in favor of biosimilar manufacturers...more

FDA Seeks Comments on Evaluation of Proposed New Model for Reviewing BLAs

by Goodwin on

The FDA announced that it is soliciting public comments on the statement of work for the assessment of its proposed new model for the review of original Biologics License Applications submitted under section 351(k) of the...more

SCOTUS: Supreme Court Lifts Biosimilars by Allowing Early Commercial Marketing Notice

The Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc., marking the first time the Court has interpreted the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (“BPCIA”) for the approval of biosimilar drugs. On...more

Supreme Court overturns the Federal Circuit, granting more flexibility to biosimilar makers

by Thompson Coburn LLP on

In a unanimous opinion, the United States Supreme Court again reversed the Federal Circuit in Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc., interpreting the meaning of key provisions of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of...more

Supreme Court Issues Highly Anticipated Decision Interpreting the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act

On June 12, the Supreme Court decided Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc., the first case under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (BPCIA) to reach the high court. The BPCIA establishes a regulatory pathway for...more

Sandoz v. Teva: Supreme Court Nixes Post-Approval Waiting Period for Biosimilars

by Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: In its first opinion relating to the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (“BPCIA”), the Supreme Court in Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc. provided a win to biosimilar companies, eliminating the...more

Supreme Court Permits Biosimilar Drugs to Be Marketed Sooner

by Snell & Wilmer on

On June 12, 2017, in Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc., the United States Supreme Court unanimously held that a drug manufacturer may give a required 180-day notice of its intent to market a biosimilar drug before receiving FDA...more

PTAB Finds Two Abbvie Adalimumab Method of Use Patents Unpatentable in Final Written Decisions

by Goodwin on

The PTAB has issued Final Written Decisions in IPRs filed by Coherus against two of Abbvie’s patents, IPR2016-00188 (U.S. Patent No. 9,017,680) and IPR2016-00189 (U.S. Patent No. 9.073,987), finding the challenged claims...more

Industry Perspectives On The Biosimilar Patent Dance

by Foley & Lardner LLP on

The Supreme Court could issue its decision in the Amgen v. Sandoz biosimilar patent dance case any day now. Last week I participated in a panel discussion with industry stakeholders considering how the decision might–or might...more

Remicade® Update: Passing Up Your Chance to Dance Can Increase Damages

by K&L Gates LLP on

On March 2, 2017, U.S. District Court Judge Mark Wolf provided guidance for determining the appropriate measure of damages in Janssen Biotech, Inc. v. Celltrion Healthcare Co. In particular, Judge Wolf described the framework...more

Remicade® Update: Passing Up Your Chance to Dance Can Increase Damages

by K&L Gates LLP on

On March 2, 2017, U.S. District Court Judge Mark Wolf provided guidance for determining the appropriate measure of damages in Janssen Biotech, Inc. v. Celltrion Healthcare Co. In particular, Judge Wolf described the framework...more

Biosimilars Update -- Pfizer's Proposed Epogen®/Procrit® Biosimilar Recommended for Approval

On May 25, 2017, the FDA's Oncologic Drug Advisory Committee recommended approval of biologics license application ("BLA") 125545 submitted by Hospira Inc., a Pfizer company, for Retacrit, a proposed biosimilar to Amgen...more

Part III: Stakeholder Comments on FDA’s Interchangeability Guidance for Biosimilars

This post, Part III, of a three-part series on FDA’s interchangeability draft guidance highlights a number of open issues that stakeholders have identified in their comments to FDA....more

Part II: Stakeholder Comments on FDA’s Interchangeability Guidance for Biosimilars

This post, Part II, of a three-part series (Part I) on FDA’s interchangeability draft guidance, highlights the key issues that were raised in the stakeholder comments provided to FDA. FDA received 52 comments in total from a...more

FDA Begins Reorganization that Will Affect How it Regulates Medical Technology

by Hogan Lovells on

What impact will the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s significant reorganization efforts have on how the agency regulates medical technology? The agency is reorganizing the Office of Regulatory Affairs (ORA) and combining...more

We Received a Patent Term Extension - Now What?

by Pepper Hamilton LLP on

This is the final article in our five-part series on PTE. Obtaining a patent term extension (PTE) is extremely valuable to an innovator. By design, PTE extends the patent term to recoup time lost to the rigorous...more

Practical Issues for the Pharmaceutical and Biopharmaceutical Industry in the Wake of TC Heartland

The US Supreme Court this week held that the broad venue provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1391(c) does not apply to patent law—at least, when the defendant is a domestic entity. This decision arises after years of judicial...more

CMS Urged To Reverse Obama-Era Biosimilar Reimbursement Policy

A bipartisan congressional effort is underway to convince CMS to reverse its biosimilar reimbursement policy implemented under the Obama administration. We discussed the current reimbursement policy in a March 2016 blog post...more

178 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 8
Cybersecurity

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.