News & Analysis as of

Are Your Website’s Terms and Conditions Enforceable? Ninth Circuit Rejects Barnes & Noble’s Browsewrap Terms of Use

Like most online retailers, Barnes & Noble posts “Terms of Use” on its website, which users may review by clicking on a hyperlink that takes them to the webpage on which the terms of use are displayed. Barnes & Noble relied...more

Business Litigation Reporter -- October 2014

California - Browsewrap Arbitration Agreement Not Enforced Against Individual Consumer. In Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Inc., 2014 WL 4056549 (9th Cir. Aug. 18, 2014), the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of B&N’s motion...more

What, exactly, is a browsewrap?

Browsewrap, clickwrap, clickthrough, terms of use, terms of service, EULA. Just what are we talking about and how did we get here? In Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble, Inc., 2014 WL 4056549 (9th Cir. Aug. 18, 2014) the US...more

Browsewrap Agreement Held Unenforceable Against Consumer Due to Insufficient Notice

Many commercial websites rely on “browsewrap” agreements to bind visitors to commercial terms. A recent decision by the Ninth Circuit suggests that a review of how those terms are presented may be in order to ensure...more

Online Browsewrap Agreement Unenforceable Due to Lack of Notice, Illusory Terms

In In re Zappos.com, Inc., 2012 WL 4466660 (D. Nev. Sept. 27, 2012), a Nevada district court ruled that an arbitration clause contained in a browsewrap agreement that could be accessed via an inconspicuous link buried near...more

5 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1