Clean Air Act, EPA | JD Supra Law News

Massachusetts Packaging Plant Pays Nearly $485K Penalty For Environmental Violations

by Philip Ahrens, John M. Formella, Kenneth Gray, Dixon P. Pike | Pierce Atwood LLP on 4/17/2013

A packaging company in Dudley, MA has agreed to pay $484,900 in penalties to settle EPA claims that the company violated numerous federal and state regulations. The violations occurred at the company’s liquid and aerosol...more

EPA Permitting Regulations Vacated—Project Delays Expected

by Darlene Marsh | Burr & Forman on 3/29/2013

The recent decision in Sierra Club v. EPA, 705 F.3d 458 (D.C. Cir. 2013) vacated all of EPA’s rules on Significant Monitoring Concentrations (“SMCs”), as well as some (the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (“PSD”)...more

EPA Tightens Air Regulations for Emissions During Shutdown, Startup and Malfunction

by William Cleveland, IV, Perrin Dargan, III, Cliff Rothenstein, John Spinello | K&L Gates LLP on 3/14/2013

Introduction - Of particular concern to electric utilities and other major sources operating under Title V permits, on February 12, 2013, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) initiated steps under the Clean...more

The Fifth Circuit Rejects EPA’s Disapproval of Alabama’s Opacity Regulation: Do We Blame EPA, DOJ, or Two Judges?

by Seth Jaffe | Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law on 3/11/2013

On Wednesday, in Alabama Environmental Council v. EPA, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected EPA’s 2011 disapproval of Alabama’s opacity regulation. The case involves relatively obscure provisions of the Clean Air Act,...more

EPA’s New Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials Rule

by Richard Stoll | Foley & Lardner LLP on 3/8/2013

In its massive new industrial boiler rules (issued January 31, 2013), EPA singled out “manufacturers of motor vehicle parts and accessories” as one of the most affected industry types. On February 7, 2013, EPA issued a new...more

"D.C. Circuit Decision May Significantly Impact the Process for Obtaining Clean Air Act Permits"

by Henry Eisenberg, Don Frost, Jr. | Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on 2/28/2013

In Sierra Club v. Environmental Protection Agency, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 1408 (D.C. Cir. Jan. 22, 2013), the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision that is likely to have a significant impact on...more

EPA Finalizes Revisions To Clean Air Standards For Stationary Engines

by Scott Hitch | Burr & Forman on 2/8/2013

On January 15, 2013, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized revisions to standards to reduce air pollution from stationary engines that generate electricity and power equipment at industrial, agricultural,...more

The "State" of the Shale Play in the United States: A Look Back on 2012 and What to Expect in 2013

by Martin Booher, Cassie J. Dallas, Jason Yearout | BakerHostetler on 2/5/2013

During 2012, several states adopted new statutory and regulation programs addressing the exploitation of shale resources within their boundaries. Continuing a common election year theme, Congress took no significant formal...more

Boiler Or Incinerator And Secondary Materials That Are Solid (Not Hazardous) Wastes

by Ronald Farley | Burr & Forman on 2/1/2013

It’s almost never easy to fathom federal environmental regulations and this held true when a set of regulations was recently issued by the U.S. EPA. On December 20, 2012, the Agency issued a series of rules, primarily under...more

EPA Will Continue to Apply the "Functional Interdependence" Test for Air Quality Source Determinations Outside of the Sixth...

by Tad Macfarlan, David Overstreet, Bryan Rohm, Craig Wilson | K&L Gates LLP on 1/24/2013

Introduction - On December 21, 2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) issued a new guidance memorandum (the “Page Memorandum”) on single source determinations for the oil and gas industry under the Clean...more

DC Circuit Remands PM2.5 Implementation Rules to EPA

by Cozen O'Connor on 1/24/2013

On January 4, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held in Natural Resources Defense Council v. EPA, No. 08-1250, that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had improperly promulgated...more

EPA Loses Another PSD Case: The Clean Air Act is “Extraordinarily Rigid”

by Seth Jaffe | Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law on 1/23/2013

In Sierra Club v. EPA, issued today, The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia rejected EPA’s rules governing “significant impact levels” and “significant monitoring concentrations” for determining PSD permitting...more

Approval of $1.375 million in EPA Fines Highlights Importance of Commercial Property Owners Complying with Environmental Reporting...

by Jarrett Bingemann, Robyn Neely | Akerman Senterfitt on 1/23/2013

On January 3, 2013, the Environmental Appeals Board approved an administrative settlement that requires New Cingular Wireless PCS to pay a total of $1.375 million in fines and environmental projects for alleged violations of...more

Skadden's 2013 Insights: Regulatory

by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on 1/21/2013

Communications Law: The Relentless Pursuit of Broadband Competition - As the Obama administration enters its second term, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) is one of many federal agencies likely...more

DISPUTE RESOLUTION: Oil & Gas Litigation: Seven States Threaten to Sue to Force EPA to Address Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas...

by King & Spalding on 1/18/2013

New York, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont recently sent EPA Administrator Jackson a Clean Air Act Notice of Intent to Sue based on the Agency’s failure to take certain actions...more

Home

Legal News

Find a Lawyer

Browse Subjects

Subscribe

Pro Services

For Reporters

Clean Air Act › EPA

Massachusetts Packaging Plant Pays Nearly $485K Penalty For Environmental Violations

EPA Permitting Regulations Vacated—Project Delays Expected

EPA Tightens Air Regulations for Emissions During Shutdown, Startup and Malfunction

The Fifth Circuit Rejects EPA’s Disapproval of Alabama’s Opacity Regulation: Do We Blame EPA, DOJ, or Two Judges?

EPA’s New Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials Rule

"D.C. Circuit Decision May Significantly Impact the Process for Obtaining Clean Air Act Permits"

EPA Finalizes Revisions To Clean Air Standards For Stationary Engines

The "State" of the Shale Play in the United States: A Look Back on 2012 and What to Expect in 2013

Boiler Or Incinerator And Secondary Materials That Are Solid (Not Hazardous) Wastes

EPA Will Continue to Apply the "Functional Interdependence" Test for Air Quality Source Determinations Outside of the Sixth...

DC Circuit Remands PM2.5 Implementation Rules to EPA

EPA Loses Another PSD Case: The Clean Air Act is “Extraordinarily Rigid”

Approval of $1.375 million in EPA Fines Highlights Importance of Commercial Property Owners Complying with Environmental Reporting...

Skadden's 2013 Insights: Regulatory

DISPUTE RESOLUTION: Oil & Gas Litigation: Seven States Threaten to Sue to Force EPA to Address Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas...

Patton Boggs Insights - December 2012: Litigation/Courts: Three Sentenced To Prison For Asbestos Violations

California Environmental Law and Policy Update - January 16, 2013

California Environmental Law and Policy Update - January 10, 2013

Energy And Environmental Law Alert: Feds Continue Aggressive Enforcement Of Emissions Limits For Power Plants

Seven States File Notice of Intent To Sue USEPA Over Methane Emission Standards

EPA Tightens Air Quality Standards for Fine Particles

California Environmental Law and Policy Update - December 20, 2012

The Natural Gas Industry: 2012 Year in Review and Look Ahead

Environmental Update - Michigan Environmental News November/December 2012

Fracking Continues to be Target of Regulators and Environmental Groups

Expand Your Reach