News & Analysis as of

Daubert Ruling Expert Testimony

Another One Bites the Dust: Plaintiff’s Causation Expert Excluded in Hernia Mesh Litigation

by Reed Smith on

We spent Sunday evening in the familiar confines of a top-notch local professional theatre. The production was a short (80-minute), two-character play. It was entirely dialogue-driven, so everything the audience learned came...more

Plaintiffs’ Causation Expert Renounces His Own Conclusions – and Withdraws – in Mirena IIH Litigation

by Reed Smith on

We have blogged before about the Mirena IUD litigation. Cases alleging injuries from device migration and uterine perforation were centralized in an MDL in the Southern District of New York but summary judgment was granted...more

Update – Which Decisions Have Excluded Dr. Parisian, And About What?

by Reed Smith on

Back in 2013, we published a comprehensive post on the checkered Daubert history of the notorious and prolific (in equal amounts) plaintiff-side “FDA expert” (although she routinely attempts to opine way beyond FDA matters) –...more

Summary Judgment for All Pending Cases in The Mirena MDL

by Reed Smith on

We often lament, in our curmudgeonly way, that plaintiffs in obviously lacking cases get chance after chance to keep going, all the while imposing costs and risks on the defendants and a burdens on court dockets. Plaintiffs...more

Expert’s Failure to Test Theory No “Silver Bullet” for Defense

by Wilson Elser on

The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit recently held that an expert offering opinions on a proposed safer alternative design in a product liability matter does not need to perform any testing of the...more

Good Things Sometimes Come in Big Packages: Mirena Daubert Rulings Favor the Defense -- Big Time

by Reed Smith on

We spend a large portion of our professional life preparing motions to exclude the testimony of plaintiffs’ experts in mass tort litigation. Our pleasure in reading today’s decision is no doubt a function of the frequent...more

The Use of Expert Opinions in ‘Reverse-Payment’ Settlement Cases Under Actavis - King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., et al. v....

by McDermott Will & Emery on

Applying its previous rulings in related litigation and interpreting FTC v. Actavis, 570 U.S. 756 (2013), the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania was tasked with determining whether to preclude expert...more

In Daubert Ruling Excluding Both Parties’ Damages Experts, Judge Andrews Rejects FRAND Portfolio Rate as Ceiling on Reasonable...

On February 25, 2016, Judge Richard Andrews granted the parties’ cross-motions to exclude both sides’ damages experts in M2M Solutions LLC v. Motorola Solutions, Inc., C.A. No. 12-33-RGA, Dkt. Nos. 295 and 296 (D. Del. Feb....more

NC Court of Appeals’ first Daubert decision in a civil case: expert allowed to testify as to cause of fatal accident

As I previously posted, in 2011 North Carolina became a Daubert state which raised the bar for the admissibility of expert testimony in NC state courts.  In April of 2015, the NC Court of Appeals issued its first decision...more

Guest Post - Game of Unknowns: A Daubert Ruling From the Middle District of Florida

by Reed Smith on

Here at the DDL Blog, there are few things we enjoy more than a defense-friendly Daubert ruling – one of those things being, of course, our regular Sunday night HBO date with Game of Thrones. The “Hardhome” episode two...more

December 2014: Life Sciences Litigation Update: MDL Court Strikes Plaintiffs’ Experts’ Testimony on Human Causation in Zoloft®...

MDL Court Strikes Plaintiffs’ Experts’ Testimony on Human Causation in Zoloft® Products Liability Litigation. This summer, the U.S. District Court presiding over a multi-district products liability litigation issued a pair of...more

Legislature Amends Evidence Code Provisions Governing Admission Of Expert Testimony

by Carlton Fields on

The Florida Legislature passed House Bill 7015, dealing with expert testimony, which has been signed into law by Governor Scott. Chapter 2013-107, Laws of Florida, amends Florida’s evidence code to conform to Rule 702 of the...more

Cables Sliced on Class Action in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend

by Dechert LLP on

Key Points - - Comcast Corp. v. Behrend clarifies that the Court's 2011 decision in Wal-Mart v. Dukes, which requires an inquiry into the merits to the extent necessary to resolve Rule 23 issues, extends to antitrust...more

Seagulls on the Water?¹ Has California Supreme Court Indicated A Major Change in Direction for the Admissibility of Expert Opinion...

by Low, Ball & Lynch on

California courts have generally granted qualified experts wide latitude in permitting their opinion testimony to be heard by a jury. In the recent case of Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v University of Southern California (2012)...more

14 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1
Cybersecurity

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!