Expert Testimony

News & Analysis as of

Court Precludes Expert’s Lost Profits Testimony

Andrews, J. Defendants’ motion to preclude plaintiff’s expert’s testimony is granted with respect to lost profits and denied with respect to reasonable royalty. The court took testimony and held oral argument on January 30,...more

Declarant Must Be Made Available for Deposition in the United States - Square, Inc. v. REM Holdings 3, LLC

Addressing the location of a deposition of patent owner’s declarant, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (PTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) concluded that, absent an agreement between the parties to...more

Fourth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment against EEOC in Background Check Suit

Last week, in Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) v. Freeman, No. 13-2365 (4th Cir. Feb. 20, 2105), the Fourth Circuit affirmed the award of summary judgment against the EEOC in its suit alleging that the...more

Louisiana Federal Court Excludes “Every Exposure” Testimony

Adding to the growing body of case law that rejects the so-called “every exposure” theory, a federal court in Louisiana has excluded specific causation opinions of a plaintiffs’ expert who relied on the theory, finding that...more

The Use of Internal Experts in Canadian Litigation

Who better to provide expert evidence on a product than a client’s own engineer or designer who has spent years working with the product? Often, in a product liability case, the individual with the best knowledge about an...more

Expert Testimony in Indemnity Action Not Limited to Opinions Presented in Underlying Matter

In National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh Pa. v. Tokio Marine and Nichido Fire Insurance Co. (filed 2/4/2015, B24899 and B247258), the California Court of Appeal, Second District, held that the insurer of Costco...more

District Court Denies Motion to Exclude Defendants' Experts from Claim Construction But Orders the Defendants to Supplement Their...

In this patent infringement action, the plaintiff filed a motion to exclude the defendants' claim construction experts. The plaintiff's motion was based on the argument that the defendants' disclosures did not comply with...more

Ontario Court of Appeal says Draft Expert Reports are not Producible

The Court of Appeal for Ontario confirmed today that: - counsel can and should discuss draft expert reports with their expert witnesses, and - draft reports and other communications between counsel and...more

Toxic Tort and Environmental Litigation: District Court Finds Expert Proof Insufficient to Prove Causation (1/15)

Causation is often the biggest hurdle a plaintiff must clear in proving a toxic tort case. For that reason, it would be expedient if a plaintiff could get to trial on the issue of causation merely by showing that...more

The Need For Expert Evidence To Make Out An Innocent Landowner Defense Under CERCLA

As every litigator knows, evidence almost always tells a story that is untidy and riddled with loose ends. This was illustrated by a recent innocent landowner case in California — Coppola v. Smith. There, a company had...more

Patent Owner: Preponderance of Evidence Standard Can Never Be Met Without Expert Testimony

In IPR2013-00357, Patent Owner Overland Storage, Inc. filed a request for rehearing of the final written decision holding that claims 1-11 of U.S. Patent No. 6,328,766 are unpatentable. The basis for the patent owner's...more

Chicago Federal Court Bars Expert Testimony Espousing the “Any Exposure” Theory

On December 22, 2014, in a pre-trial ruling, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, in Krik v. Crane Co., et al., No. 1:10-cv-07435 (N.D. Ill. December 22, 2014) barred perennial plaintiff’s expert Dr....more

Complex Litigation Update: Bridging the Gap between Data on Causation of Lost Profits and the Admissibility of Expert Opinions

The Eleventh Circuit recently held in Chapman v. Procter & Gamble Distributing, LLC that when determining the admissibility of medical expert causation testimony, the court, acting as the gatekeeper, must find that the...more

IP Newsletter - January 2015

In This Issue: - Castle Defense: Federal Circuit Reinforces Patent Damages Gate in VirnetX - Standards Patent Licensing: Always Apportionment, Sometimes Stacking - Supreme Court to Consider Good-Faith...more

Daubert Motion Denied Where Defendant Had "Salubrious Fodder" for Cross-Examination If Plaintiff's Expert Used Wrong Source Code

Defendant Adobe Systems ("Adobe") filed a Daubert motion seeking to limit the testimony of plaintiff EveryScapes' expert, Dr. Maja Bystrom ("Dr. Bystrom"), for three reasons. First, Adobe sought to exclude the...more

Daubert Challenge to Damage Expert Denied Where Contested Matters Were for Cross-Examination and Not Proper for Exclusion

In this patent infringement action, Apple challenged the opinions of the plaintiff's damage expert on several bases, including the determination of a royalty rate based on the price of third-party applications....more

Motion to Strike "Errata Sheets" to Deposition Testimony Granted Where Plaintiff's Expert Witnesses Changed Answers from "No" to...

In this patent infringement action, the defendant filed a motion to strike the "errata sheets" to deposition testimony of two of plaintiffs' expert witnesses, Neill Luebke and Robert Sinclair. The plaintiff opposed the motion...more

Motion for Observation Must Follow Guidelines

Medtronic, Inc. v. NuVasive, Inc. - The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) dismissed a patent owner’s improper motions for observation, agreeing with the petitioner that the...more

No Cross-Examination of Expert at the Close of Evidence

A.C. Dispensing Equipment Inc. v. Prince Castle LLC - Addressing the appropriate timing of cross-examination of expert witnesses in an inter partes review (IPR), the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and...more

Appellate Court Notes

- SC19080 - Sanchez v. Commissioner of Correction - SC19013 - State v. Terwilliger - SC19013 Concurrence - State v. Terwilliger - AC35918 - Scandariato v. Borrelli Trial court was held not to have...more

December 2014: Life Sciences Litigation Update: MDL Court Strikes Plaintiffs’ Experts’ Testimony on Human Causation in Zoloft®...

MDL Court Strikes Plaintiffs’ Experts’ Testimony on Human Causation in Zoloft® Products Liability Litigation. This summer, the U.S. District Court presiding over a multi-district products liability litigation issued a pair of...more

One Expert In, One Expert Out in Illinois Asbestos Case

An Illinois federal judge recently approved only one of two well-known asbestos experts to testify in a former pipefitter’s asbestos exposure case. U.S. District Judge John Z. Lee of the Northern District of Illinois held...more

Ask the Experts About Bad Faith; Just Be Careful How You Do It

In bad faith cases, juries must often decide if the way an insurer processed a claim lacked a “reasonable” basis. Courts have consistently held that experts can help—by explaining how a claim is supposed to be handled. The...more

Appellate Court Notes

SC19118 - E & M Custom Homes, LLC v. Negron - New home warranty claim was successfully asserted as a counterclaim to a mechanic lien foreclosure. You will have to read the Appellate Court decision to find out what...more

Did You Know that an Expert can Testify that You were At Fault—Even if You Were Not!

Barry P. Goldberg is careful when advising accident victims that think that their case is a “slam dunk” on liability. In fact, claimants should be aware that if the case goes into active litigation the insurers will hire...more

188 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 8