Expert Testimony

News & Analysis as of

Considerations for Submission of Experimental Evidence to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Experimental evidence can be a powerful tool in succeeding in an inter partes review proceeding, particularly in the case where inherent properties of prior art are at issue. As indicated by the requirements of 37 C.F.R. §...more

Southern District of Illinois Court Denies Motion to Exclude “Every Exposure” Opinion

On September 21, 2015, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois denied a defendant’s motion in limine to exclude expert testimony in an asbestos case. Judge Staci M. Yandle denied General...more

Belden Inc. v. Berk-Tek LLC (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Do you want the good news or the bad news first? Well, the good news is that the Federal Circuit has begun reversing PTAB decisions on the merits for IPR proceedings. To be fair, in the Microsoft case, the Federal Circuit...more

U.S. v. AseraCare and the Standard of Falsity Under the False Claims Act

Prosecutors, defense attorneys and health care providers alike have been closely watching the U.S. v. AseraCare (No. 2:12-cv-00245) matter pending in the Northern District of Alabama. The AseraCare case relates to hospice...more

The Florida Legislature’s Need to Control – the Daubert Rule

This is in response to the article in the Daily Business Review, Opponents of New Expert Witness Rule Rely on Outdated Authority [COMMENTARY] by Christopher Johnson, Daily Business Review. This recent article claims that...more

Evening Things Out Some With Trial Evidence Rulings In A Bellwether Case

We have no personal anecdote to share, no movie to discuss, no holiday theme to weave in, and no (self-described) clever theme for our post. It is a beautiful fall day where we have a relative lull in our slate of...more

PTAB May Allow a Petitioner to Correct An Improper IPR Reply Brief

Last week, the Federal Circuit explained that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board did not err when it allowed a petitioner to revise its Inter Partes Review Reply brief after first cautioning the petitioner that the PTAB may...more

Can’t Run Away from Your Expert’s Testimony: Board Says Testimony from Another Proceeding Admissible - Edmund Optics, Inc. v....

Addressing the admissibility of testimony from prior proceedings, the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) denied the petitioner’s motion to exclude the prior testimony of its own...more

Fact-Intensive Reasonable Royalty Analysis Need Not Be Peer Reviewed or Published to Be Admissible - Summit 6, LLC v. Samsung...

Addressing the admissibility of expert testimony on damages issues, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the district court’s admission of expert testimony based on a fact-intensive analysis that was not...more

Accused Infringer Rides Antitrust Roller Coaster - Magnetar Technologies Corp. v. Intamin Ltd.

Addressing antitrust issues in connection with a dismissed patent infringement lawsuit, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed a grant of summary judgment dismissing antitrust and malicious prosecution...more

“Mechanism” Claim Term Found to Be an Indefinite Means-Plus-Function Element - Media Rights Techs. v. Capital One Financial Corp.

Addressing whether a claim term was a means-plus-function term under the pre-America Invents Act (AIA) 35 U.S.C. § 112 ¶ 6, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit construed the disputed term as a...more

Plaintiffs’ Antitrust Experts Are Dauberted More Often

According to a new study by the Law & Economics Center at George Mason University (as reported in MLex), 59% of the time, antitrust defendants succeeded on some aspect of their Daubert motions in class action cases, while...more

Big Pimpin' gets big win in copyright case

Greenberg Glusker partner Glen Rothstein was quoted in “Big Pimpin' gets big win in copyright case” (Daily Journal, October 22, 2015). In the closely watched Fahmy v. Jay Z., complex issues of international copyright,...more

T.J. Simers Discrimination Trial: At Last, The “Ethical Breach”!

Last week, I mentioned that I still didn’t really understand what “ethical breach” Mr. Simers had allegedly committed, and I threw out a request for help from someone (anyone?) with a media background....more

Big Pimpin’ Trial: Musicologist Can Make or Break a Case

Greenberg Glusker Partner Glen Rothstein was quoted in an article that ran in The Daily Journal on October 19th regarding notes and expert testimony in the “Big Pimpin’ trial.”...more

A Frye Opinion By Any Other Name: Zoloft Plaintiffs' Experts Excluded in Philadelphia

We spent the weekend in the Boston area, visiting the Drug and Device Law Rock Climber for “parents’ weekend.” Saturday’s schedule was replete with activities: a keynote speech by the university president, lectures on topics...more

Failing to Respond in Good Faith to Request for Admissions Can Have Costly Consequences

Timothy Grace, et al. v. Levik Mansourian, et al. - Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District (September 15, 2015) - The main purpose of a request for admissions is to eliminate issues by compelling admissions of...more

Recent Florida Decision on the Admissibility of Treating Physician Testimony Based on Hypothetical Facts Which Differ from Those...

Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal recently considered when a treating physician may offer testimony based on hypothetical facts different than those presented in a medical malpractice case. In Cantore v. West Boca...more

Texas Appellate Court Sides with Energy Industry by Requiring Personal Injury Plaintiffs to Submit Expert Testimony in Nuisance...

In a significant victory for the energy industry, on October 7, 2015, the San Antonio Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment in favor of Marathon Oil Corporation, Marathon Oil EF, LLC (together “Marathon”) and Plains...more

Even though Defendant filed Disguised Daubert Motion that Court Called "Untimely" and "Lame," the District Court Granted the...

In this patent infringement action, Defendant R/X Automation Solutions filed a motion in limine to exclude one of plaintiff's experts. The district court concluded that the motion was an untimely Daubert motion because the...more

Three Strikes and Out of Court for Breast Implant Opt-Out

Over the weekend, we watched one of our favorite “chick flicks,” a holiday-themed montage entitled “Love, Actually.” One of our favorite characters, played by the ever-brilliant Bill Nighy, is an over-the-hill former pop...more

Making Sense of the Daubert and Summary Judgment Orders in A Metal-on-Metal Hip Implant Bellwether Case

We have not posted for a while—that day job can really get in the way sometimes—so we agreed to tackle the ridiculously long decision in Christiansen v. Wright Med. Tech. Inc., MDL No. 2329, 1:13-cv-297-WSD, 2015 U.S. Dist....more

Appellate Court Notes

Supreme Court Advance Release Opinions: SC19359 - Persels & Associates, LLC v. Banking Commissioner - Noting that it has generally been the policy of the Courts to defer to the Legislature, especially as to the...more

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Reinforces the Standard for Detailed and Complete Expert Disclosures and Clarifies the...

Massachusetts has made much ado about expert disclosures in recent years, even going so far as to implement the still “newish” Superior Court Rule 30B, which requires experts to sign party disclosures of the facts, opinions...more

CAUTION: Unreasonable Denials of Requests for Admission Can Prove Costly

In Grace v. Mansourian, (filed 8/17/2015, order published 9/15/2015, No. G049590) the Fourth District Court of Appeal held a defendant’s denials of plaintiff’s requests for admission were unjustified given the substantial...more

265 Results
View per page
Page: of 11

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.