Intellectual Property Litigation

News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court Rules on “Tacking” and District Court Distinguishes Dish Network from Aereo

Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank – What You Need to Know - Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court held that whether two trademarks may be tacked for purposes of determining priority is a question for the jury, because...more

Cloud Computing: Legal Issues on the Horizon

In the May 2014 issue of the Business Litigation Report, we discussed a hot topic in law and technology: cloud computing. That topic did not cool down over the summer. Businesses and courts—including the Supreme Court—have...more

De Novo Review of Claim Construction No Longer the De Facto Standard

On January 20, the U.S. Supreme Court, in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, rejected the de novo review standard applied by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit when reviewing all claim construction...more

Supreme Court Decides Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank

On January 21, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank, No. 13-1211, holding that whether two trademarks are “legal equivalents” creating a single, continuing commercial impression and may be...more

Truth or Consequences: Sanctions Fly in Telenovela Copyright Infringement Case

The case of Latele Television v. Telemundo Communications Group might have been a simple factual dispute over copyright ownership, but instead it has devolved into a series of accusations — including allegations of willful...more

Petitions Filed for December 23, 2014

Petitions Filed (3) - Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC filed IPR 2015-000396, challenging U.S. Patent No. 7,218,313, assigned to APLIX IP HOLDINGS CORPORATION....more

Institution Decisions and Dispositions for December 22, 2014

Institution Decisions (1) - In Jiawei Technology (USA) Ltd. v. Simon Richmond, IPR2014-00935, Paper 11 (December 22, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1–7, 9, 10, 14, 17–20, 23, 28, 43, 45 and...more

Seventh Circuit Cites Petrella to Save Copyright Suit from Dismissal

Chicago Building Design, P.C., et. al. v. Mongolian House, Inc., et. al. - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit applied the Supreme Court of the United States’ May 2014 ruling in Petrella (IP Update, Vol....more

Design Patent Case Digest: Reddy v. Lowe’s Companies, Inc.

Decision Date: November 18, 2014 - Court: District of Massachusetts - Patent: D677,423 - Holding: Plaintiff’s proposed claim construction ADOPTED - Opinion: Plaintiff Maureen Reddy sued...more

A Trap For Santa: The First Santa Claus IP Fight

At this time of year, you may be wondering about the first intellectual property case involving Santa Claus. And even if you are not, we are going to tell you....more

No Fair Use for Digital Excerpts

Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al. - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit vacated the district court’s decision holding that digital excerpts of books from three academic publishers provided to...more

Bo Knows, How To Beat a Trademark Bully

This Bo might not have won the Heisman Trophy, he might not have played in the NFL or MLB, he might not have enjoyed a lucrative Nike endorsement deal, and he might not have been named ESPN’s greatest athlete of all time, but...more

Celltrion Healthcare Co. v. Kennedy Trust for Rhematology Research (S.D.N.Y. 2014); Hospira Inc. v. Janssen Biotech Inc. (S.D.N.Y....

Earlier this month, Judge Paul Crotty, U.S. District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York handed down rulings in two separate cases related to the biosimilars law (the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation...more

IP Newsflash - December 2014: DISTRICT COURT CASES: A Contrary Construction from Reexamination Is No Basis to Reconsider a...

On December 10, 2014, the Southern District of New York denied plaintiff’s motion to reconsider a 2006 claim construction ruling and vacate a related summary judgment order. Plaintiff requested the relief following a contrary...more

Court Denies Duplicative Deposition (New Jersey)

Koninklijke Philips Elecs. N.V. v. Hunt Control Sys., Inc., 2014 WL 5798109 (D. N.J. Nov. 7, 2014). In this trademark case, the parties engaged in discovery disputes over the plaintiff’s “ability to search and produce...more

Institution Decisions and Dispositions for December 11, 2014

Institution Decisions - In Fujitsu Semiconductor Limited v. ZOND, INC., IPR2014-00864, Paper 16, (December 11, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 18–34 (all the challenged claims) of U.S. Patent...more

Institution Decisions for December 9, 2014

In HTC Corporation v. E-WATCH, Inc., IPR2014-00989, Paper 6 (December 9, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1–6, 8, 10, 11, 13–18, 21–29, and 31 (“all of the challenged claims”) of U.S. Patent No....more

Institution Decisions for November 28, 2014

Institution Decisions - In Eastman Kodak Company v. CTP Innovations, LLC, IPR2014-00789, Paper 9 (November 28, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1–9 (all of the challenged claims) of U.S. Patent...more

Institution Decisions and Dispositions for November 26, 2014

Institution Decisions - In CAO Group, Inc. v. The Procter & Gamble Company, IPR2-14-00796, Paper 18 (November 6, 2014), the Board denied inter partes review of claims 1 to 13 of U.S. Patent No. 5,989,569....more

Institution Decisions and Dispositions for November 25, 2015

Institution Decisions - In Excelsior Medical Corporation v. Becton, Dickinson and Company, IPR2014-00880, Paper 12 (November 25, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 10, 12, and 14 of US Patent No....more

China’s new Intellectual Property Courts: the wait is finally over

The PRC Supreme People's Court has issued the Provisions on the Establishment of Intellectual Property Courts in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, announcing the establishment of the long-awaited Intellectual Property Courts...more

The World in US Courts - Orrick's Quarterly Review of Decisions Applying US Law to Global Business and Cross-Border Activities

Fall 2014 - The Global law firm Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP takes great pride in announcing the Summer 2014 edition of The World in US Courts: Orrick’s Quarterly Review of Decisions Applying US Law To Global...more

Banking On Your Executive’s Compliance With the Trade Secrets Law

On behalf of the Commission on the Theft of American Intellectual Property, the National Bureau of Asian Research published its findings in 2013. Members of the Commission included Craig R. Barrett, former Chairman and CEO of...more

Litigation and enforcement in Japan: overview

What are the main dispute resolution methods used in your jurisdiction to settle large commercial disputes? Litigation - Litigation is the most frequently used dispute resolution method to settle large...more

The New China and Your Company's Intellectual Property

The Chinese economy has changed dramatically in the past two, five, and even 20 years, but its intellectual property (IP) laws have only very recently developed to somewhat better deal with the new reality. The new Chinese...more

60 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 3