Motion to Compel Discovery

News & Analysis as of

Plaintiff Must Cooperate on Search Terms, Says Court: eDiscovery Case Law

In Pyle v. Selective Insurance Company of America, No. 2:16-cv-335 (W.D. Pa. Sept. 30, 2016), Pennsylvania Senior District Judge Terrence F. McVerry granted the defendant’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Provide ESI Search...more

Court Orders Party to Attempt On-Site Data Collection (New York)

Sky Med. Supply Inc. v. SCS Support Claim Servs., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121215 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2016) - In this RICO case, the defendants filed a motion to compel, arguing that the plaintiff responded to an ESI request...more

A Self-Inflicted High Discovery Cost Does Not Render Information “Inaccessible”

Wagoner v. Lewis Gale Med. Ctr., LLC, No. 7:15cv570 (W.D. Va. July 13, 2016). In Wagoner v. Lewis Gale Med. Ctr., LLC, court held that the plaintiff’s “limited request” for discovery, “restricted by custodian, search...more

Tennessee Business Court Decides “who goes first” in Discovery in Trade Secrets Case

In a Tennessee Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“TUTSA”) case, the Tennessee Business Court set some discovery guidelines for business competitors in litigation over alleged misappropriation of trade secrets. Cryosurgery, Inc. v....more

Court Will Not Force Responding Party to Use TAR; Judge Peck Authors another Key Predictive Coding Opinion (New York)

Hyles v. New York City, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100390 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 1, 2016) - In this employment discrimination case, the plaintiff moved to compel the defendants to utilize Technology Assisted Review (TAR) when...more

Appeals Court Upholds Default Judgment for Discovery Violations, Including Wiping Files from Laptop: eDiscovery Case Law

In Trude et. al. v. Glenwood State Bank, et. al., Nos. A15-0378, A15-1863, A15-1864 (Minn. App., Aug. 15, 2016), a Minnesota Appeals Court affirmed the trial court’s entry of default judgment for repeated discovery...more

Proportionality Factors Persuade Court to Grant Motion to Compel (Pennsylvania)

First Niagara Risk Mgmt. v. Folino, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106094 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 11, 2016) - In this dispute over the violation of a non-compete agreement, the plaintiff moved the court to compel a discovery request....more

“Rather Broad” Discovery Request Is Nonetheless Proportional to Case

First Niagara Risk Mgmt., Inc. v. Folino, No. 16-1779 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 11, 2016). The court concluded that the plaintiff’s requested scope of discovery from the defendant’s electronic devices, while “rather broad,” was...more

Court Refuses to Compel Disclosure of Archived E-Mails Due to “Undue Burden and Cost”

Elkharwily v. Franciscan Health Sys., No. 3:15-cv-05579-RJB (W.D. Wash. July 29, 2016). After a previous order granting the plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery of “live” e-mails, the court denied the plaintiff’s...more

Court Holds that Predictive Coding Does Not Change Discovery Standard (Federal Circuit)

Dynamo Holdings Ltd. P’ship v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, No. 2685-11, 8393-12, 2016 WL 4204067 (T.C. July 13, 2016) - In this tax case, the respondent sought a motion to compel the petitioners to provide documents...more

If Plaintiff Wants Discovery on Defendant’s Backup Tapes, Court Rules He Must Pay for Them: eDiscovery Case Law

In Elkharwily v. Franciscan Health Sys., No. 3:15-cv-05579-RJB (W.D. Wash. July 29, 2016), Washington District Judge Robert J. Bryan, finding that the defendant had met its burden to show that retrieving electronically stored...more

Court Refuses to Compel Production of Archived Emails on Backup Tape (Washington)

Elkharwily v. Franciscan Health Sys., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99795 (W.D. Wash. July 29, 2016) - In this employment discrimination case, the plaintiff moved the court to compel production of discovery from archived email....more

Texas Appeals Court Denies Petition For A Writ Of Mandamus That Trial Court Erred In Denying Motion To Vacate Arbitration Panel’s...

A Texas appeals court denied a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Irving Drobny, on behalf of National Accident Insurance Group (“NAIG”) and National Accident Insurance Underwriters (“NAIU”) (collectively, “NAIU”),...more

Counsel Sanctioned for Misrepresentations and Citations to “Badly Out of Date” Federal Rules

Fulton v. Livingston Fin., LLC, No. C15-0574JLR, 2016 WL 3976558 (W.D. Wash. July 25, 2016). After a motion to compel in which the defendant sought to obtain all “relevant and non-privileged” information, the court...more

“Caveat Emptor” Applies to ESI Requests (Puerto Rico)

P.R. Med. Emergency Grp., Inc. v. Iglesia Episcopal Puertorriqueña, Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99391 (D.P.R. July 26, 2016) - In this Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) case, the plaintiff...more

Court Clarifies the Obligation to Utilize Rule 26(b)(1) Proportionality Factors (Kansas)

Rowan v. Sunflower, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72254 (D. Kan. June 2, 2016) - In this personal injury case, the plaintiff motioned the court to compel discovery from one of the defendants. Before this motion, the defendant...more

2016 Updates to Ediscovery for Defendants Cheat Sheet

We’ve been remiss in updating our cheat sheet devoted to ediscovery for defendants. Because of the broad nature of the topic – these cases can and do arise in a wide variety of non-drug/device contexts – we have to research...more

District Court Orders Production of Bills from Expert Witnesses But Permits Redaction of Narrative Statements in Bills

In this patent infringement action, the defendant, Ericsson moved to compel the plaintiff, TCL, to produce bills and invoices for worked performed by TCL's expert witnesses. TCL sought to redact the bills and invoices to...more

Court Says Prolonged Discovery Periods Are Not “Marvelous” (Rhode Island)

Wai Feng Trading Co. v. Quick Fitting, Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77672 (D.R.I. June 14, 2016) - In this intellectual property and collection action, the defendant moved the court to compel discovery of ESI in its...more

Court Holds Rule 26(b)(1) Cannot be Used for Unpled Claims or Defenses (New York)

Lifeguard Licensing Corp. v. Kozak, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68724 (S.D.N.Y. May 23, 2016) - In this intellectual property case, the defendants motioned the court to compel production of various discovery. The plaintiffs...more

Ignorance Is No Grounds to Avoid Production (Ohio)

FDIC v. Ark-La-Tex Fin. Servs., LLC, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82444 (N.D. Ohio June 24, 2016) - In this contract dispute, the defendant motioned the court to compel discovery of loan policies and procedures maintained...more

Looking Back on 2015: The 6 Most Important eDiscovery Cases in Delaware - Part 1

In re: ISN Software Corporation Appraisal Litigation, C.A. No. 8388–VCG, Oral Argument on Petitioners Motion to Compel and Partial Rulings of the Court, April 27, 2015. In this fifth motion to compel before Vice...more

Court Holds Personal Data Discoverable for a Work Related Claim (New York)

Sunderland v. Suffolk Cty., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77212 (E.D.N.Y. June 14, 2016) - In this civil rights case, the plaintiff motioned the court to compel the defendants “to search for and produce certain documents from...more

The Failure to Issue a Legal Hold Can Cause a Case to Crash and Burn

Bruner v. Am. Honda Motor Co., No. 1:15-00499-N, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62810 (S.D. Ala. May 12, 2016). Where a defendant had never initiated a legal hold and had been continuously deleting e-mails since litigation began,...more

Defendant's "Piecemeal" Approach to Discovery and Review of Only Select Files of Corporate Employees Results in Sanctions

In this patent infringement action, the defendants conducted a "piecemeal approach to discovery, reviewing only the files of select corporate employees." The district court found that this approach was contrary to the Federal...more

101 Results
View per page
Page: of 5
JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.