News & Analysis as of

Court Strikes Expert Opinions, No Punishment Intended

Order Granting Takeda’s Motion to Strike, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. LTD., et al., v. TWi Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-02420-LHK (Judge Lucy H. Koh) - The Northern District Patent Local Rules are specifically...more

The Tyranny of the Judiciary

There has always been a tension between the need for a final arbiter of the law and the inherent power associated with such a role placed in the judicial branch. Jefferson himself was wary of this tendency, writing in a...more

Judge Finds Biosimilar Patent Procedures Optional

Judge Seeborg of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued an order in Amgen, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., ruling that the patent dispute resolution procedures of the Biologics Price Competition and...more

Court Report - March 2015 #4

About Court Report: Each week we will report briefly on recently filed biotech and pharma cases. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1:15-cv-00049; filed March 19, 2015 in the Northern District of...more

Dancing Not Required: District Court Denies Amgen’s Bid for Preliminary Injunction, Finds BPCIA “Patent Dance” Optional

The biologics industry has been closely monitoring Amgen Inc.’s (“Amgen’s”) lawsuit against Sandoz Inc. (“Sandoz”) for refusing to engage in the BPCIA’s “patent dance” with respect to Sandoz’s application for Zarxio®, a...more

District Court Rules Against Amgen’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction to Prevent Marketing of Sandoz’s Biosimilar Zarxio

In an order released on March 19, 2015, U.S. District Court Judge Richard Seeborg of the Northern District of California denied Amgen’s motion for judgment on the pleadings as well as its request for a preliminary injunction...more

Court Report - March 2015 #3

About Court Report: Each week we will report briefly on recently filed biotech and pharma cases. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. Sandoz Inc. et al. 1:15-cv-01716; filed March 9, 2015 in the District Court of New...more

Supreme Court: Patent Claim Construction – Two Standards Of Review

The Supreme Court recently decided a patent case involving a significant procedural issue. In Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 135 S.Ct. 831 (1/20/15), the question before the Court was whether the Federal...more

The First Biosimilar Application Has Been Approved -- But What About the Patent Issues?

As we reported earlier this week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") approved the first biosimilar application -- an application by Sandoz to market a biosimilar version of Amgen's NEUPOGEN® (filgrastrim) biologic...more

Business Litigation Report - February 2015

- Firm News: - Main Article: ..Traversing the Breach: Why You Need to Prepare for Data Breaches and How to Do It - Noted With Interest: ..Direct Purchasers and End Payors Accuse Brand Pharma of...more

The Remicade Biosimilar Patent Dispute

While Sandoz has grabbed the biosimilar headlines for being the first company to have a product approved under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (its product Zarxio™ (filgrastim-sndz) is a biosimilar of...more

Court Report - March 2015 #2

About Court Report: Each week we will report briefly on recently filed biotech and pharma cases. Janssen Biotech, Inc. et al. v. Celltrion Healthcare Co., Ltd. et al. 1:15-cv-10698; filed March 6, 2015 in the District...more

POSITA Motivated to Pursue Clinical Development of Therapy Disclosed in Prior Art Despite Potential Safety and Efficacy Hurdles

The PTAB recently held that the challenged claims in two patents assigned to Genzyme and one patent assigned to Duke University on methods for treating Pompe disease are invalid. ...more

PTAB Rejects Attempts to Expand the Scope of CBM Review - Par Pharm., Inc. v. Jazz Pharm., Inc.

Addressing for the first time a request for covered business method (CBM) review by a generic drug maker facing an infringement suit under the Hatch-Waxman Act, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (PTO’s) Patent Trial and...more

Federal Circuit Review - February 2015

More Deference to District Courts in Claim Construction - In TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. v. SANDOZ, INC., No. 13-854, the Supreme Court held that factual findings underpinning claim construction rulings are reviewed...more

PTAB Update -- Biopharmaceutical Edition

Earlier this week, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB" or "Board") handed down what is thought to be the first set of inter partes review ("IPR") Final Written Decisions ("FWDs") in the biopharmaceutical industry. And...more

The Iron Law of Unintended Consequences - (with apologies to Robert Michels)

It is a certainty that no matter what action is taken (by an individual, a group, or especially a legislative body) that there will be unintended consequences. It is also true that those unintended consequences, like the...more

Pharmaceutical Patent Score a Win - Amneal Pharms., LLC v. Supernus Pharms., Inc.

In three separate but related final written decisions in the first successful defense of a pharmaceutical patent in an inter partes review (IPR), the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (PTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board...more

Petitioners Denied Second Bite at IPR Petition - Biodelivery Sciences Int’l, Inc. v. RB Pharms. Ltd.; Standard Innovation Corp. v....

In two separate but similar written decisions involving challenged patents that were already the subject of instituted proceedings, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) denied...more

Court Report - February 2015 #4

About Court Report: Each week we will report briefly on recently filed biotech and pharma cases. Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc. et al. v. Pfizer, Inc. 2:15-cv-01283; filed February 18, 2015 in the District...more

Warner Chilcott Co, LLC v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc

Case Name: Warner Chilcott Co, LLC v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., Nos. 2014-1439, 2014-1441, 2014-1444, 2014-1445, 2014-1446, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 21946 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 18, 2014) (Circuit Judges Lourie, Reyna and Taranto...more

Court Report - February 2015 #3

About Court Report: Each week we will report briefly on recently filed biotech and pharma cases. Novartis AG et al. v. Ezra Ventures LLC. 1:15-cv-00150; filed February 11, 2015 in the District Court of Delaware. •...more

Teva receives license to three patents covering oxycodone dosage forms

Purdue Pharma L.P. et al. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.; Purdue Pharma L.P. et al. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. Case Number: 1:13-cv-04606-SHS; 1:14-cv-02357-SHS - Teva settled with plaintiffs in two...more

Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc.,

Case Name: Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc., No. 2014-1693, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 22903 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 5, 2014) (Circuit Judges Dyk, Taranto, and Chen presiding; Opinion by Taranto, J.) (appeal from N.D. Cal, Chesney, J.) (A...more

Mylan Pharms., Inc. v. FDA

Case Name: Mylan Pharms., Inc. v. FDA, Civ. Nos. 14-1522, 14-1529, 14-1593, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 24022 (4th Cir. Dec. 16, 2014) (Circuit Judges Wilkinson, Shedd, and Wynn presiding; Opinion by Wynn, J.) (Appeal from N.D....more

418 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 17