Proportionality

News & Analysis as of

Proportionate liability now dead for financial planners?

On May 13th, The High Court significantly diminished (and arguably removed) the benefit of proportionate liability provisions in the Corporations Act and the ASIC Act in its judgment of Selig v Wealthsure Pty Ltd [2015] HCA...more

High Court to clarify proportionate liability – judgment imminent

Those of you following our coverage regarding the proceedings of Selig & Anor v Wealthsure Pty Ltd & Ors, presently before the High Court of Australia, will be pleased to hear that judgment is set to be delivered at 10am on...more

ESI Case Law Update 2015

In this Issue: - Introduction - Preservation - Proposed Amendments to Rule 37 - Search Methodology/Technology-Assisted Review - Proportionality - Cost-shifting - Form...more

Non-Settling CERCLA Defendants Beware: Ninth Circuit Provides Lower Courts with Discretion to Allocate Liability Using Equitable...

There is a split of authority on how credits for settlements under the Comprehensive Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) are allocated to non-settlors. Some courts have applied the proportionate share...more

Ninth Circuit Addresses Several CERCLA Issues of First Impression in the Circuit

In AmeriPride Services Inc. v. Texas Eastern Overseas Inc., the Ninth Circuit examined several issues under CERCLA, some of which were issues of first impression in the Circuit, including: - Whether a district court...more

High Court to clarify proportionate liability – an update

As previously reported, special leave has been granted in the appeal of Selig & Anor v Wealthsure Pty Ltd & Ors, which presents an opportunity for the High Court to clarify the law in relation to proportionate liability.  The...more

Proportionality Depends on Parties Cooperating (Washington)

Johnson v. Allstate Property and Cas. Ins. Co., 2014 WL 7377198 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 29, 2014). In this insurance case, the plaintiffs made a motion to compel the search of 34 employee computers under the control of the...more

Wearable Technology: A Perfect Fit For Litigation [Video]

It has been said that technology made large populations possible and that large populations now make technology indispensable. The words of Joseph Wood Krutch, written in 1959, could not be more relevant today. ...more

High Court to clarify proportionate liability – an update

As previously reported,special leave has been granted in the appeal of Selig & Anor v Wealthsure Pty Ltd & Ors, which presents an opportunity for the High Court to clarify the law in relation to proportionate liability. The...more

2014 E-Discovery Year in Review

2014 was another eventful year for e-discovery and information management in Canada. Set out below are some of the major trends and developments that emerged over the last year....more

High Court to clarify proportionate liability

Many readers will be aware of the Full Federal Court decisions of Wealthsure Pty Ltd v Selig [2014] FCAFC 64 and ABN AMRO Bank NV v Bathurst Regional Council [2014] FCAFC 65, which are in conflict as to how proportionate...more

Proposed FRCP Changes: Effect on eDiscovery, RIM & IG (CLE) [Video]

The Supreme Court is expected to approve a proposed set of revisions to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), which would go into effect by December of 2015. Are you ready for those changes? In this program, Rimon...more

Court Denies Motion for Proportionality, Suggests Other Methods to Save Time and Money (Nebraska)

United States v. Univ. of Nebraska at Kearney, 2014 WL 4215381 (D. Neb. Aug. 25, 2014). In this housing discrimination case, the plaintiff sought an expanded scope of discovery through a motion to compel. The plaintiff...more

Latest Trends in E-Discovery: The Focus on Proportionality and Cooperation

When asked what has been the most significant development in federal litigation during his time on the bench, United States Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola of the D.C. District responded, simply: “the impact upon the...more

What Is the Appropriate Scope of Discovery?

On February 18, 2014, the public comment period closed on the proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. To date, almost 3,000 comments have been published, many of which addressed the appropriate scope of...more

Reed Smith Lawyers Support Proposed Federal Rules Reforms

A number of Reed Smith attorneys have been active in supporting the proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, particularly those aimed at narrowing the discovery process through consideration of...more

Proportionality, Nexus Don't Matter If It's Not A Taking

Landowners routinely have to give up something in return for a government agency's granting a discretionary permit. Developers are quite familiar with these requirements, as they are consistently compelled to dedicate...more

Government Need Not Satisfy Nexus and Proportionality Tests if Dedication Requirement Does Not Otherwise Constitute a Taking

Landowners routinely have to give up something in return for a government agency’s granting a discretionary permit. However, there are limits, as the government agency cannot typically demand conditions that are not...more

California Supreme Court Set to Hear First Post-Koontz Takings Case

As reported by our colleague Robert Thomas on inversecondemnation.com, the California Supreme Court granted the California Building Industry Association's (CBIA) petition for review in California Building Industry Association...more

There’s No Place Like Home: Kansas Courts Issue New Ediscovery Guidelines

Cooperation, proportionality and efficiency. Oh my! One of the first lessons we are taught as a child is how to share. Unfortunately, for decades, the opposite has been drilled into litigation professionals. Judicial...more

Committee Proposes “Specificity Requirement” To Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 34 (b)

What kind of impact can be expected from the “Proportionality Discovery Proposals?” These Proportionality Discovery Proposals refer to the proposed amendments to the Federal Rules designed to balance the benefits of...more

Proposed Proportionality Amendment To Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1)

On May 8, 2013, the Civil Rules Advocacy Committee (“Committee”) proposed several changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The proposal includes amendments to the following rules: 1, 4, 16, 26, 30, 31, 33, 34, 36, and...more

Top 5 Ediscovery Case Summaries – August 2013: Pennsylvania - Proportionality Must Be Considered for Spoliation Sanctions

PTSI, Inc. v. Haley, 2013 WL 2285109 (Pa. Super. Ct. May 24, 2013). In this employment law case, the plaintiff appealed a trial court’s denial of motion for sanctions against the defendants who allegedly erased...more

Rulemaking Efforts Move Forward

Efforts to amend the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure took another step forward last week. On June 3, 2013, the Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure (“the Standing Committee”) approved a package of proposals...more

Perils Of Proportionate Reduction, And A Detour Through D-Day

First, an admission and a regret: My June 6 post missed the 69th anniversary of an episode as significant as any in our country’s history: D-Day. ...more

28 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 2

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.
×