News & Analysis as of

Important Changes to the Federal Rules

Be prepared to adapt your litigation and cost management strategies to the new amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) which will take effect on December 1, 2015. The amendments follow a four-year effort...more

2015 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Provide Opportunities for More Aggressive Case Management

On December 1, 2015, substantial changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP or Rules) will take effect. The Rule changes affect many aspects of federal court practice, most significantly with respect to the scope...more

Them’s the Rules: Preparing for the December 1st FRCP Amendments

With the 2015 FRCP amendments going into effect on December 1st, those of us working in e-discovery have to decide which camp we’ll fall in when it comes to our approach. The rule that was the most debated is 37(e). This was...more

CLIENT ALERT: Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Amendments to Take Effect December 1, 2015

On December 1, 2015, amendments to Rules 1, 4, 16, 26, 30, 31, 33, 34, 37, 55 and 84 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will become effective. These amendments were originally approved by the Judicial Conference in...more

A Trick-or-Treater’s Guide to the Federal Rule Amendments

Unless Congress takes action within the next month, important amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will take effect on December 1, 2015. Several of these changes will shape how we approach e-discovery, but will...more

Never Be a Beast of Burden: Amended Rule 26(b) and Best Practices for Employment Litigators

The Dec. 1, 2015 amendment to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b) offers employers and their counsel a powerful new weapon to attack overreaching written discovery by demonstrating that the burden of the discovery request...more

Judiciary & In-House Legal Discuss the Necessary Skills to Stay Successful in Today's Competitive Legal Market

The train has left the station. The boat has left the dock. E-Discovery is not today’s new legal buzzword. E-Discovery should be as commonplace in the legal profession as the phrase ‘early case assessment’ or ‘due...more

Data Subject Access Requests – Stick to What’s Reasonable, Proportionate, and Has the Proper Motive, Says UK Court

In August, the High Court, in Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing [2015] EWHC 2366 (Ch), refused an application to compel a UK law firm (“TW”) to comply with a data subject access request (“DSAR”) under the Data Protection...more

Privacy in financial markets, not to be ignored

The Article 29 Working Party published a letter it sent to the European Commission urging it to consider the data protection and privacy issues when adopting the secondary regulations (‘Regulations’) necessary to implement...more

Get to Know the E-Discovery Changes to the FRCP

Five years ago, a group of judges and legal professionals comprising the Federal Civil Rules Advisory Committee met at Duke University to begin the discussion of potential e-discovery rule changes to the Federal Rules of...more

California Supreme Court Denies Requests to Depublish San Juan Capistrano Case

Action Means the Closely Watched Tiered Water Rate Case Is Final - The California Supreme Court on Wednesday denied requests to depublish the appellate court opinion in Capistrano Taxpayers Association v. City of San...more

Proportionate liability now dead for financial planners?

On May 13th, The High Court significantly diminished (and arguably removed) the benefit of proportionate liability provisions in the Corporations Act and the ASIC Act in its judgment of Selig v Wealthsure Pty Ltd [2015] HCA...more

High Court to clarify proportionate liability – judgment imminent

Those of you following our coverage regarding the proceedings of Selig & Anor v Wealthsure Pty Ltd & Ors, presently before the High Court of Australia, will be pleased to hear that judgment is set to be delivered at 10am on...more

ESI Case Law Update 2015

In this Issue: - Introduction - Preservation - Proposed Amendments to Rule 37 - Search Methodology/Technology-Assisted Review - Proportionality - Cost-shifting - Form...more

Non-Settling CERCLA Defendants Beware: Ninth Circuit Provides Lower Courts with Discretion to Allocate Liability Using Equitable...

There is a split of authority on how credits for settlements under the Comprehensive Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) are allocated to non-settlors. Some courts have applied the proportionate share...more

Ninth Circuit Addresses Several CERCLA Issues of First Impression in the Circuit

In AmeriPride Services Inc. v. Texas Eastern Overseas Inc., the Ninth Circuit examined several issues under CERCLA, some of which were issues of first impression in the Circuit, including: - Whether a district court...more

High Court to clarify proportionate liability – an update

As previously reported, special leave has been granted in the appeal of Selig & Anor v Wealthsure Pty Ltd & Ors, which presents an opportunity for the High Court to clarify the law in relation to proportionate liability.  The...more

Proportionality Depends on Parties Cooperating (Washington)

Johnson v. Allstate Property and Cas. Ins. Co., 2014 WL 7377198 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 29, 2014). In this insurance case, the plaintiffs made a motion to compel the search of 34 employee computers under the control of the...more

Wearable Technology: A Perfect Fit For Litigation [Video]

It has been said that technology made large populations possible and that large populations now make technology indispensable. The words of Joseph Wood Krutch, written in 1959, could not be more relevant today. ...more

High Court to clarify proportionate liability – an update

As previously reported,special leave has been granted in the appeal of Selig & Anor v Wealthsure Pty Ltd & Ors, which presents an opportunity for the High Court to clarify the law in relation to proportionate liability. The...more

2014 E-Discovery Year in Review

2014 was another eventful year for e-discovery and information management in Canada. Set out below are some of the major trends and developments that emerged over the last year....more

High Court to clarify proportionate liability

Many readers will be aware of the Full Federal Court decisions of Wealthsure Pty Ltd v Selig [2014] FCAFC 64 and ABN AMRO Bank NV v Bathurst Regional Council [2014] FCAFC 65, which are in conflict as to how proportionate...more

Court Denies Motion for Proportionality, Suggests Other Methods to Save Time and Money (Nebraska)

United States v. Univ. of Nebraska at Kearney, 2014 WL 4215381 (D. Neb. Aug. 25, 2014). In this housing discrimination case, the plaintiff sought an expanded scope of discovery through a motion to compel. The plaintiff...more

Latest Trends in E-Discovery: The Focus on Proportionality and Cooperation

When asked what has been the most significant development in federal litigation during his time on the bench, United States Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola of the D.C. District responded, simply: “the impact upon the...more

What Is the Appropriate Scope of Discovery?

On February 18, 2014, the public comment period closed on the proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. To date, almost 3,000 comments have been published, many of which addressed the appropriate scope of...more

38 Results
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.