In Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes, the EAT decided that a partnership's mandatory retirement age (MRA) of 65 for partners was a proportionate means of achieving the partnership's legitimate aims of workforce planning and...more
Mandatory retirement is generally unlawful under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. So when an employer urges an employee to retire, isn't this evidence of age discrimination that an employer should avoid?
The transition of many companies from using traditional "final average pay" plans to "cash balance" pension plans in the last two decades has created significant employee discontent, and therefore substantial litigation. ...more
Mandatory retirement ages have been largely eliminated for most employees, but still continue in a handful of areas. For many years, the Federal Aviation Administration prohibited pilots over the age of 60 from flying for...more
U.S. Territory Will Provide Anti-Discrimination Training & Relief, Settling the Federal Agency's First Lawsuit in American Samoa -
PAGO PAGO, American Samoa - The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) today...more
The answer to this question is, surprisingly, not clear. For Ontario, Quebec, Manitoba and the Yukon, the provincial human rights legislation treats mandatory retirement as age discrimination regardless of what age it is...more
Back to Top