Zubulake

News & Analysis as of

Top 5 Ediscovery Case Summaries – July 2013: California - No Relevance of the Evidence? No Sanctions

Cottle-Banks v. Cox Commc’ns, Inc., 2013 WL 2244333 (S.D. Cal. May 21, 2013). In this spoliation case, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant charged a rental fee to customers for use of “set-top-boxes”, even though...more

Top 5 Ediscovery Case Summaries – June 2013: Puerto Rico - Court Denies Taxation and Cost-Shifting of Ediscovery Costs

W Holding Co., Inc. v. Chartis Ins. Co. of Puerto Rico, 2013 WL 1352426 (D.P.R. Apr., 3, 2013). In this discovery dispute, the plaintiffs sought cost taxation of ediscovery costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920 or cost-shifting...more

Top 5 Ediscovery Case Summaries – April 2013: New Jersey - Court Denies Motion for Protective Order, Cost-Shifting

Juster Acquisition Co., LLC v. N. Hudson Sewerage Auth., 2013 WL 541972 (D.N.J. Feb. 11, 2013). In this case, the defendant motioned for a protective order with regard to sixty-seven allegedly overboard search terms...more

Electronic Discovery: Avoiding Disaster: 2013 Zubulake Updates

It is always a good idea to Shepardize or Keycite important cases, especially when the case involves the ever evolving area of e-discovery. We find ourselves always checking the cases in our CLE entitled “Electronic...more

NY Courts Adopt Federal E-Discovery Cost Allocation Standard

On February 28, 2012, Justice Acosta of the First Department, Appellate Division, adopted the federal Zubulake standard to determine which party is responsible for the cost of searching for, retrieving, and producing...more

E-Discovery Developments From The Land Of Zubulake

Shortly after the turn of the century, a series of decisions emanated from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on the topic of “e-discovery.” Many would argue that Judge Shira Scheindlin’s opinions...more

6 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1