Latest Publications

Share:

Connecticut Appellate Court Affirms Commissioned Agents Are Not Retailers Under the Connecticut Petroleum Franchise Act

The Connecticut Appellate Court held that convenience store operators who dispensed fuel as commissioned agents were not “retailers” under the Connecticut Petroleum Franchise Act (CPFA). Branford Quick Mart, LLC v. Aldin...more

Florida District Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Franchisee and Franchisor Entities on TVPRA Claims.

A Florida federal district court recently granted summary judgment, holding that claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA) were time-barred. Doe K.R. v. Choice Hotels, 2025 WL 3469855 (M.D....more

Tenth Circuit Affirms Stay of Petition to Compel Arbitration Pending Washington State Court Proceedings

The Tenth Circuit recently affirmed a federal district court decision staying a supplier’s action to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) while related litigation proceeded in Washington state court. Nu...more

Pennsylvania Federal Court Confirms Arbitration Award for Choice Hotels Over Franchisee Objections

A federal court in Pennsylvania recently confirmed a final arbitration award in favor of Choice Hotels, denying the franchisee’s motion to vacate the award. Choice Hotels Int’l, Inc. v. Jai Sai Baba LLC, 2025 WL 2636596 (E.D....more

FTC Voluntarily Dismisses Recently Filed Suit Against PepsiCo for Illegal Price Discrimination

On May 22, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) voluntarily dismissed its case against PepsiCo alleging price discrimination in violation of the Robinson-Patman Act. Federal Trade Commission v. PepsiCo, Inc.,...more

DOJ Antitrust Division Secures First Win in Criminal Wage-Fixing Case

On April 14, 2025, a federal jury in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada convicted the operator of a home healthcare staffing agency of a criminal violation of the federal antitrust laws. ...more

Citing California Franchise Relations Act, California Federal Court Rejects Franchisor’s Attempt to Dismiss Case

A federal court in California recently denied a franchisor’s motion to dismiss litigation, holding that a franchise agreement provision requiring the parties to mediate in Texas prior to instituting litigation or arbitration...more

FTC Sues PepsiCo for Illegal Price Discrimination Under Robinson-Patman Act

The Federal Trade Commission recently sued PepsiCo, Inc. alleging that the company engaged in illegal price discrimination by providing a large retailer with unfair pricing advantages in violation of the Robinson-Patman Act....more

Franchisor Not Liable for Alleged Customer Injuries at Franchised Water Park

A federal court in Mississippi granted summary judgment in favor of a franchisor on negligence claims that arose after eleven children allegedly contracted E. coli in a franchised water park’s pool. Neely v. Great Escapes...more

California Federal Court Grants Hotel Franchisor’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Sex Trafficking Claims

A federal court in California recently granted summary judgment in favor of a hotel franchisor on sex trafficking claims brought under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA). J.M. v. Red Roof Inns,...more

Michigan Federal Court Grants Motion to Dismiss Claims Against One Owner of Franchisor, Denies Motion to Dismiss Claims Against...

A federal court in Michigan recently granted a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction against one owner of a franchisor, while denying the motion to dismiss against the other owner and granting the franchisor’s...more

Michigan Precedent on Michigan Franchise Investment Law Held to Trump Inconsistent Sixth Circuit Precedent on Private Right of...

A federal court in Michigan recently granted several related franchisors’ motions to dismiss a franchisee’s claims for violations of the Michigan Franchise Investment law. Benjamin Franklin Franchising SPE LLC v. David...more

Wisconsin Federal Court Grants Manufacturer’s Motion to Dismiss Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and Antitrust Claims

A federal court in Wisconsin recently dismissed a multi-district class action suit in which owners of Harley-Davidson motorcycles asserted that Harley-Davidson violated the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (MMWA), as well as state...more

Ohio Federal Court Grants Hotel Franchisors’ Motions for Summary Judgment on Sex Trafficking Claims

A federal court in Ohio recently granted summary judgment in favor of multiple hotel franchisors on sex trafficking claims brought under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA). S.C. v. Wyndham Hotels &...more

North Carolina Federal Court Stays Litigation of Non-arbitrable Claims Pending Resolution of Related Arbitration

A federal court in North Carolina has held that considerations of judicial economy required that litigation of nonarbitrable claims should be stayed pending completion of a related arbitration. Medical Search Consultants, LLC...more

Kentucky Federal Court Questions Proposed $5 Million Settlement in Anti-poaching Class Action

Refusing to rubber-stamp a proposed $5 million anti-poaching class action settlement, a federal court in Kentucky has directed the plaintiff to provide additional information to allow proper consideration of the factors...more

Seventh Circuit Reverses Dismissal of Anti-Poaching Class Action Against McDonald’s

In an important case of first impression that drew amicus participation from the Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, and the International Franchise Association, the Seventh Circuit reversed a judgment in...more

Fifth Circuit Affirms Dismissal and Summary Judgment on Distributor’s Claims for Fraud and Breach of Contract Against Manufacturer

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a Texas federal court’s (i) dismissal of a distributor’s fraud claims against an automobile-product manufacturer and (ii) grant of summary judgment in favor of the manufacturer on...more

Maryland Federal Court Denies Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens but Grant’s Franchisee’s Motion to Dismiss for Personal...

A federal court in Maryland granted a foreign hotel franchisee’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction but denied a forum non conveniens motion in a personal injury case naming both franchisor and franchisee as...more

Nevada Federal Court Transfers Venue to Illinois Notwithstanding Forum-Selection Clause

A federal court in Nevada recently transferred a franchisor’s trademark infringement lawsuit to Illinois, the location of the franchise, declining to rule on the franchisor’s motion for preliminary injunction. Hofbräuhaus of...more

20 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide