Latest Posts › Patent Litigation

Share:

When Does A Work-at-Home Employee’s Residence Become The Employer’s Place Of Business For Patent Suits?

Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue, BillingNetwork Patent, Inc. v. Modernizing Medicine, Inc., N.D. Ill. (November 6, 2017) (Judge Ruben Castillo) - We previously reported here about...more

New Flavors Of The Alice Analysis On Display In Federal Circuit Ineligibility Ruling

Two-Way Media Ltd v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC et al., Fed. Cir. (November 1, 2017) - The Federal Circuit’s decision last week to invalidate all of the claims of two audio and video streaming patents as claiming no...more

Invalidation Of A Claim In A Closely-Related Patent Dooms Preliminary Injunction

In Sebela Int’l Ltd. v. Actavis Labs., FL, Inc., Civil Action Nos. 17-4789-CCC-MF & 17-4964-CCC-MF (D.N.J. Sep. 14, 2017), plaintiffs Sebela International Limited, Sebela Ireland Limited, and Sebela Pharmaceuticals Inc....more

District of Delaware “Clips”- Off Venue-Discovery for Medical Device Company but Allows It for Pharmaceutical Company

Boston Sci. Corp. v. Cook Grp., Inc., No. 15-980-LPS-CJB, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146126, at *2 (D. Del. Sep. 11, 2017); Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Mylan Pharm., Inc., No. 17-379-LPS, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146372, at *3 (D....more

A Defendant’s Understanding of Infringement Contentions Is Not Enough To Comply With The Patent Local Rules

Order Granting Motion to Strike, Staying Discovery, and Granting Leave to Amend, GeoVector Corporation v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd, Case No. 16-cv02463-WHO (Judge William H. Orrick) - Albert Einstein once noted: “Any...more

Trying to Erase the Past: Judge Won’t Vacate Section 101 Ruling After Settlement

Order Denying Motion to Vacate Judgment, Protegrity USA, Inc. v. Netskope, Inc., Case No. 15-cv-02515-YGR (Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers) - When parties settle a case, they usually want to put it all behind them and move...more

Separated at the District Court, Possibly Reunited on Appeal

Defendants Are Reunited Notwithstanding Plaintiff’s Attempts To Keep Them Apart:  Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay and Granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Emmanuel Gonzalez v. Tagged, Inc., Case No....more

The “Pot, Kettle, Black” Doctrine

The adage “the pot calling the kettle black”—referring to someone who is guilty of the very thing that he accuses another of—is a bit of equitable common sense that practitioners ought not to forget. In a recent patent...more

Bench Trial Findings Come Back to Bite Finjan

Collateral Estoppel Results In Summary Judgment On Priority Date, Finjan, Inc. v. Proofpoint, Inc., et al., Case No. 13-cv-05808 (Judge Haywood Stirling Gilliam, Jr.) - How does an accused infringer use a patentee’s...more

District Courts Won’t Wait Forever: Stay Lifted Pending Rehearing of IPR Denial

Order Lifting Stay, MLC Intellectual Property, LLC v. Micron Technology, Inc., Case No. 14-cv-03657-SI (Judge Susan Illston) As we have reported in the past, judges in the Northern District are generally willing to stay a...more

Synthesizing More Lessons From the Silicon v. Cresta Frequency Synthesizer Case

Order Re: Motions For Summary Judgement And Defendant’s Motion To Strike, Silicon Laboratories, Inc. v. Cresta Technology Corporation. Case No. 14-cv-03227-PSG (Judge Paul S. Grewal) - As we previously reported, the...more

It’s All “Relative”, But No Different Here Under the New Nautilus Indefiniteness Standard

Order Denying Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgement As To Indefiniteness, Silicon Laboratories, Inc. v. Cresta Technology Corporation. Case No. 14-cv-03227-PSG (Judge Paul S. Grewal) - In one of his most famous...more

Costly Consequences to Limiting Discovery Scope

Order Re: “Other Enplas Lenses”, Enplas Display Device Corp., et al. v. Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Case No. 13-cv-05038 (U.S. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins) - Sometimes, it works to a patent owner’s advantage...more

Fruitful Harvest of Attorneys’ Fees and Sanctions for Farmville Creator Zynga

Order Granting Motion for Attorneys’ Fees: Granting Motion in Part for Sanctions, Segan LLC v. Zynga Inc., Case No. 14-cv-01315-VC (Judge Vince Chhabria) - We previously reported on the Segan v. Zynga case when Judge...more

En Banc Federal Circuit Upholds ITC’s Broad Definition of Induced Infringement

Earlier this week, an en banc Federal Circuit interpreted the scope of Section 337 of the Tariff Act (19 U.S.C. § 1337), which proscribes importation of "articles that … infringe" a U.S. patent. (Suprema, Inc. v....more

Third Time’s A Charm? Court Denies Motion to Dismiss and Anti-SLAPP Motion

Order Denying Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Anti-SLAPP Motion to Strike, Sonus Networks, Inc. v. Inventegry, Inc., C-15-0322 EMC (Judge Edward Chen) - Patent licensing company Inventegry, Inc. recently suffered some...more

When a Picture is Not Enough: Specificity of Infringement Contentions

Order Requiring Parties to Meet and Confer Regarding Infringement Contentions, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. Silergy Corporation, et al., 14-cv-01745 (Magistrate Judge Westmore) - The cliché that “a picture is...more

“And One”: Stricken Infringement Contentions Warrant Dismissal And Judgment of Non-Infringement

Order Entering Judgment, Blue Spike LLC v. Adobe Systems, Inc., 14-cv-01647 (Judge Yvonne Gonzales-Rogers) - Bay Area fans of the red-hot Golden State Warriors are familiar with basketball’s “and one” rule: if a player...more

Cooling Off Defendant’s Obviousness Case

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; Order Entering Judgment for Plaintiff, Asetek Danmark A/S v. CMI USA, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-00457-JST (Judge Jon S. Tigar) - Questions of obviousness can present some of the most...more

Federal Circuit Provides Important Guidance in RAND Disputes

On Dec. 4, 2014, the Federal Circuit issued a much-anticipated opinion in Ericsson, Inc. v. D-Link Sys., Inc., Nos. 2013-1625, -1631, -1632, -1633 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 4, 2014). The panel—consisting of Judges Kathleen O'Malley,...more

Ultramercial Inc. v. Hulu, LLC: Federal Circuit Invites Early Challenges to Subject Matter Eligibility of Software Patents

Earlier this year, in Alice v. CLS Bank, the Supreme Court set out guidelines for determining whether patents claiming software and hardware features are statutorily eligible for patentability under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Following...more

Alice v. CLS Bank: A Unanimous Supreme Court Rules On When Computer Claims are Patent-Eligible Under 35 U.S.C. § 101

On June 19, 2014, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International, No. 13-298, addressing the question of when patents claiming aspects of computer software satisfy the...more

Supreme Court Liberalizes Award of Attorney Fees in Patent Cases

Yesterday, describing the Federal Circuit's two-part test as "unduly rigid" and "impermissibly encumber[ing] the statutory grant of discretion to district courts," Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered a pair of unanimous U.S....more

U.S. Supreme Court Holds That Patentees Bear the Burden of Proof of Infringement in DJ Actions Brought by Licensee

A patentee bears the burden of proving infringement when a licensee seeks a declaratory judgment of non-infringement, the U.S. Supreme Court has held. The ruling reversed the Federal Circuit and clarified declaratory...more

24 Results
/
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.