2014 Legislative & Regulatory Outlook

by K&L Gates LLP

The K&L Gates Public Policy and Law Group (“Policy Group”) has prepared a legislative and regulatory outlook for 2014 with the purpose of identifying potential risks and opportunities for stakeholders. Conventional wisdom would seem to say that an election year is not likely to produce much legislative or regulatory action. However, we believe that 2014 may actually defy conventional wisdom and produce a good deal of activity.

We base our assessment on the recent budget deal brokered by Senate Budget Committee Chairwoman Patty Murray (D-WA) and House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI), the recent Senate rules changes for executive branch nominees, and the recent appointment of John Podesta as counselor to President Barack Obama. In essence, we believe that these developments will make it easier for Congress to complete the FY 15 appropriations process through regular order, the Senate rules changes will make it easier to confirm executive branch nominees who will subsequently go on to promulgate regulations at the federal agency level, and the appointment of John Podesta will lead to increased executive action by President Obama-- specifically in the areas of energy, environment, and climate change.

FY 14, FY 15, and the Debt Limit
As has been widely reported, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 was signed into law by  President Obama shortly before the end of 2013, which puts the Congressional appropriations process on a more stable and predictable path. The bill restructures some of the scheduled spending cuts under the process known as sequestration and establishes top-line budget numbers for both the FY 14 and FY 15 appropriations bills.

FY 14 Omnibus
House and Senate Appropriations Committee members completed negotiations on an FY 14 omnibus appropriations measure (H.R. 3547) on January 13, which provides $1.012 trillion in total funding for the federal government through the remainder of the fiscal year. The measure, unlike omnibus packages of recent years, provides new funding for all twelve appropriations bills. More specifically, it provides $492 billion in non-defense discretionary spending and $520 billion for defense discretionary spending. The House passed the measure on January 15 by a vote of 359-67 and the Senate is expected to pass it by the end of this week.

FY 15 Appropriations
It is obviously too late to influence the FY 14 appropriations process. However, with the establishment of a top-line budget number for FY 15 appropriations through the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013, stakeholders should anticipate that Congress will move very quickly to begin the FY 15 appropriations process.

President Obama is expected to release his FY 15 budget request in February after he delivers his State of the Union address on January 28. However, recent reports indicate that the date for its release may slip into March, since the White House Office of Management & Budget (OMB) is behind schedule in crafting the request, due to the recent focus on the Bipartisan Budget Act deal. Regardless, Congress will likely begin holding FY 15 appropriations hearings in February and March. If recent history is any indication, then the House may begin marking up their FY 15 appropriations bills by mid-April. It is, therefore, very important to engage Congressional staff early in 2014 to influence the FY 15 process.

Debt Limit
Additionally, the Treasury Department has recently indicated that it may need Congress to raise the federal debt limit as early as mid-February. On the other hand, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has indicated that Congress may not need to raise the debt limit until later in the spring. Either way, however, it is important to remain mindful of how Congress may use the debt limit to further cut or restructure federal spending.

Water Resources Development Act and Farm Bill
Congress may also act early this year on either the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) (H.R. 3080, S. 601) or the Farm Bill (H.R. 2642, S. 954) depending on how the respective conference negotiations proceed.

Water Resources Development Act
Conference negotiators for WRDA originally intended to finish their measure and pass it out of Congress before the end of 2013. However, negotiations have reportedly dragged on due to disagreements over certain projects for the Army Corps of Engineers. It’s possible that Congress may vote on a conference report for the bill sometime in late January.

Farm Bill
Conference negotiations for the Farm Bill also continue, due to disagreements mainly concerning the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the dairy title in the bill. According to some reports, Congress may need to pass some extension of the current Farm Bill by mid-January, in order to provide more time for conference negotiations. This notion has gained traction as conference negotiations continue over the aforementioned issues.

Immigration Reform
There are conflicting reports on the prospects for immigration reform in 2014. Some House Republican members and their staff say that the issue is all but dead, due to its controversial nature among House Republicans. On the other hand, some House Republican members and their staff express greater optimism for potential action in 2014, especially later in the year.  Indeed, Speaker Boehner convened a closed-door meeting with his caucus on January 7, where he reportedly told them that he plans to release a caucus position paper on immigration reform in the coming weeks.

House Action
The Senate passed a comprehensive immigration reform bill, The Border Security, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Modernization Act (S. 744), on June 27, 2013. House Republican leadership, however, have said that they have no intention of bringing the Senate-passed bill to the House floor for a vote, since the issue of immigration reform is very contentious within their caucus and a piecemeal legislative approach to reform is the only method likely to yield any progress. To that end, both the House Judiciary Committee and the House Homeland Security Committee have reported out five different bills dealing with issues of border security, high-skilled worker visa issues, agricultural guest worker issues, employment verification, and state and local immigration enforcement. It’s not clear which, if any, of these bills House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) will bring to the House floor for a vote.

Citizenship Issue is Key
In addition to the aforementioned bills, reports indicate that House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) continue to work on legislation that would provide a pathway to citizenship for some children of illegal immigrants. Other members of the Republican caucus, such as Rep. Joe Heck (R-NV), are reportedly also working on legislation to address the citizenship issue for illegal immigrants. The focus on citizenship is a tacit recognition that House Republicans will need to address the issue of citizenship for at least some illegal immigrants in some form, if they are ever to reach a final immigration deal with Senate Democrats.

Boehner Immigration Director
It is also important to note that Speaker Boehner recently hired Rebecca Tallent as his new director of immigration policy. Some Republican staffers have interpreted this as a sign that Boehner still intends to push the issue of immigration reform in 2014, since Tallent once worked for Senator John McCain (R-AZ), who was extensively involved in his efforts to pass comprehensive immigration reform in 2007.

As certain House Republican members continue to craft immigration reform legislation, there are opportunities for stakeholders to engage on the issue.

Defense Authorization and the Highway Bill

Defense Authorization
In modern history, one bill always passes each year – the Defense Authorization bill. It is a must pass bill and 2014 will be no different.  The House and Senate Armed Service Committees are expected to begin hearings on the FY 15 budget for the Defense Authorization bill as early as mid-to-late March. The House Armed Service Committee may begin its markups by early May, while the Senate Armed Service Committee may begin its markups by late May to early June. Early engagement with House and Senate Armed Service Committee members and staff will be critical to getting issues on the committees’ priority lists for the bills.

Highway Bill
The current surface transportation reauthorization expires on September 30, 2014. The House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee and the Senate Environment & Public Works Committee, which have jurisdiction, have already begun the legislative process with the House committee holding its first hearing on January 14.

The solvency of the Highway Trust Fund, and the ability to find acceptable revenue streams to fund the bill, will have a significant impact on Congressional negotiations over the bill, with potential tax implications. The issue of raising truck size and weight limits on interstate highways also may resurface. Large trucking companies and their customers have supported raising the limits, but freight railroads and consumer safety groups have opposed it. The bill could also serve as a vehicle to delay implementation of Positive Train Control, which the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008 mandated for implementation by the end of 2015, and for other new rail safety and economic regulatory requirements. Some House staffers say that, depending on how negotiations and markups for the surface transportation reauthorization bill develop, the House may bring a bill to the House floor for a vote sometime during the late spring.

Tax Reform
Over the past several years, the congressional tax-writing committees have been working on comprehensive tax reform legislation that would simplify and streamline the tax code in an effort to improve the fiscal health of the country and provide a solid foundation for economic growth. As part of this effort, the House Ways and Means Committee and Senate Finance Committee have been developing proposals that address all aspects of the tax system, including marginal tax rates, taxation of income, tax expenditures, deductions, credits, as well as its overall structure. Consequently, the tax reform debate could have a significant impact on individuals, as well as businesses of all types and sizes.

Opinions still differ on many of the substantive issues associated with tax reform. Despite these differences, the committees continue to move forward. Both the House Ways and Means Committee and Senate Finance Committee have released international tax reform proposals that would fundamentally change the taxation of foreign income. The Ways and Means Committee has also released proposals on the taxation of financial products, as well as a draft on the taxation of small businesses and pass-through entities. In addition, the Finance Committee has released a proposal that would completely revamp the depreciation system, changing how taxpayers capitalize and recover the cost of their assets, as well as a proposal to restructure energy tax incentives.

What the committees have not yet released could be even more significant. House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-MI) has said that in 2014 he plans to release and mark up a comprehensive tax reform bill that substantially lowers marginal tax rates and repeals dozens of tax credits, deductions, and other provisions to pay for it. The Senate Finance Committee may also release more drafts, and likely incoming Chairman Ron Wyden (D-OR) has shown a deep commitment to comprehensive tax reform during his time in office. Chairman Wyden may also revisit some issues on which the Committee released drafts under Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT).
Although comprehensive tax reform legislation may not be enacted into law in 2014, the tax reform effort is expected to continue into 2015 and beyond. Proposals released in the 113th Congress will influence tax reform going forward. Moreover, lawmakers will also look to the tax reform proposals in search of federal revenue to pay for other priorities. In addition, there is a good possibility that Congress will act this year on legislation to extend various tax provisions that expired at the end of 2013, providing another opportunity to include proposals - including revenue pay-fors - that have arisen as part of tax reform.

Trade Promotion
The next year should feature a very busy trade agenda, including the possibility of major agreements that would open up markets for U.S. goods in Europe and Asia, as well as renewed “fast-track” authority for trade agreements in Congress.

Trade Promotion Authority
The Obama Administration and Congress are currently working on Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) legislation that would make it significantly easier for the U.S. to form trade deals with other nations. TPA legislation would allow for “fast-track” consideration of trade agreements by preventing lawmakers from amending or filibustering these deals. Instead, Congress would hold simple up-or-down votes on trade agreements. This legislative mechanism has existed previously but expired in 2007. The Administration has stressed the importance of TPA legislation in order to complete trade agreements such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) (both discussed below).

In Congress, action in both the House and Senate could come in early 2014. On January 9, 2014, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT), Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Orrin Hatch (R-UT), and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-MI) released a TPA bill with the intent of moving the legislation early this year. Chairman Baucus has stated his desire to move the TPA bill before his potential confirmation as the next U.S. Ambassador to China.

Trans-Pacific Partnership
The trade deal most likely to reach its conclusion this year is the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement, which may be finalized as early as the spring of 2014. The U.S.-led negotiations, which feature a dozen countries spanning North America, South America, and Asia, would cover an area comprising about 40 percent of the global economy. The major remaining topics in the talks include intellectual property, agricultural tariffs, and competitive issues associated with state-owned enterprises. The negotiations were initially scheduled to wrap up last year but have spilled into 2014. Despite this setback, the Obama Administration is confident that negotiators will be able to reach a deal that would increase market access across the Pacific.

Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
In addition, the U.S. and European Union (EU) may complete their Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations by the end of this year. The proposed TTIP is aimed at making it easier to buy and sell goods and services between the U.S. and EU in a variety of economic sectors by removing trade barriers, including tariffs as well as non-tariff barriers such as regulations and restrictions on investment. Studies have shown that a TTIP deal could result in hundreds of billions of dollars in economic benefits to the U.S. and EU.

In 2014, the TTIP negotiations will likely focus on financial services, agriculture (with an emphasis on the treatment of genetically modified organisms), and cultural sectors of the EU economy. Five rounds of talks are planned this year, and both sides hope to wrap up the talks by the end of 2014. Stakeholders should be aware that the talks present significant risks and opportunities -- particularly in highly-regulated sectors of the economy like financial services.

Trade in Services Agreement
The Trade in Services Agreement (TISA) negotiations will also continue throughout the year. The talks, which are aimed at improving and expanding trade in services, were initiated by the U.S. and Australia and feature dozens of parties representing about 70 percent of the world’s trade in services. The talks seek to update and revise the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), which the World Trade Organization established in 1995, to account for major changes in the global economy and technological advancements in the last two decades. In particular, the parties hope to improve international data across, address competitive issues associated with state-owned enterprises, increase transparency and due process across the globe, and cut down on discriminatory rules in obtaining business licenses and permits.

Negotiators concluded the latest round of TISA talks late last year in Geneva, Switzerland, and the parties are optimistic that an agreement will be reached. With the growing importance of services sector to the U.S. economy, businesses should keep close watch on how the talks progress.

Congress is not likely to pass major energy legislation in 2014; however, energy issues will still attract substantial interest from the Congress and the Obama Administration.

Energy Exports
Pervasive deployment of hydraulic fracturing has revolutionized the energy market, resulting in record US oil and gas production and new public policy priorities. For instance, exports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and crude oil are now salient policy issues. For LNG exports, most of the focus will center on regulatory approvals required to develop LNG export terminals and authorizations to export LNG to non-free trade agreement nations. Key members of Congress, such as Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), the ranking member of the Energy & Natural Resources Committee, will actively explore lifting the crude oil export ban. Oil export legislation, however, is not likely to pass this year, given lingering concerns over security and higher prices; but the debate will be joined, perhaps allowing for its passage in the next Congress.

Climate Change
Concerns about climate change will also drive energy policy. Since legislative mandates on reducing greenhouse gases are not expected to pass both Houses of Congress anytime soon, the focus has shifted to regulatory action. The President’s Climate Action Plan will serve as the catalyst for Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rulemakings to limit greenhouse gas emissions from power plants, especially those fired by coal. Congressional Republicans and some Democrats from coal producing areas will aggressively contest EPA’s proposed rules; but they will likely be unable to stop them -- probably only delay them. Another regulatory decision driven by climate change politics is whether to proceed with the Keystone XL pipeline to ship oil from the Canadian tar sands to gulf refineries.

Renewable Energy
Renewable energy will continue to generate interest from Congress. House Republicans will probably launch new investigations of ill-fated green energy projects. Market-based conservatives and the oil industry will also likely step up efforts to repeal or modify the Renewable Fuel Standard. Production tax credits to promote wind and other renewable energy resources have expired, and pressure will build during 2014 for another extension made retroactive to the end of 2013. The Obama Administration will likely also accelerate efforts to require federal agencies to lead by example by obtaining larger percentages of energy from renewable sources.

Nuclear Energy
Nuclear energy legislation will center on nuclear waste. A bipartisan Senate bill to move forward with the recommendations of a Blue Ribbon Commission on interim storage and a consent-based process may be approved by the Senate Energy & Natural Resources Committee, but is not likely to progress much further.  The House will insist that any nuclear waste legislation continue with the licensing of the Yucca Mountain repository, especially now that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has started to revive the Yucca license review as directed by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. Much of the additional interest in nuclear energy will focus on federal funding and support for small modular reactor technologies.

New Senate Committee Chair
Finally, all of these energy policy issues will be impacted by a significant change in congressional leadership.  With Senator Max Baucus (D-MT) being nominated to serve as ambassador to China, Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) is expected to move up as the new chair of the Senate Finance Committee, creating a vacancy in the chairmanship of the Senate Energy & Naturel Resources Committee.  All indications are that Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA) will likely assume this chairmanship. Given the strong oil and gas constituency in her home state (and that she faces a difficult re-election this year), she is expected to focus the committee’s agenda more on LNG and crude oil exports, as well as offshore drilling and higher state royalties.

Almost without exception, over the last two years, Congressional Republicans ignored most health care issues with the exception of repealing the Affordable Care Act (ACA). As a result, the normal congressional checks and balances on regulatory action have been virtually non-existent. The Administration was quick to fill this gap through a number of significant regulatory changes related to both the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, as well as changes in Medicare payment policies.

Congressional Action
However, by the end of 2013, a change in Republican internal politics brought the Congress back into the debate about regulatory policy changes. For example, a large bipartisan group moved to include a provision delaying the implementation of the two (2) midnight rule until October 1, 2014—the two midnight rule would have dramatically altered the definition of an inpatient and an outpatient. This issue will continue to receive congressional attention over the next year. In addition, Congress will turn to a host of other administrative problems plaguing the Medicare program, such as Medicare Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) reform.

Although Republicans continue to give lip-service to repealing the Affordable Care Act, House Republicans will emphasize smaller bills aimed at making the implementation of the Act more difficult. Several Republican Senators have publicly acknowledged that repealing the ACA is not possible, but amendments to the Act are possible. Several key Republican Senators have been working with Democrats to draft substantive amendments to the Act. Some of the issues this bi-partisan group hopes to address are the medical device tax, taxation of health plans, medical loss ratios, continuation of existing “non-conforming” health policies beyond 2015, and the establishment of non-governmental exchanges.

Regulatory Action
After the disastrous rollout of the Affordable Care Act and continued problems with the implementation of the Act, such as matching online enrollment with health plans and subscribers, the Administration will continue to use its regulatory authority to delay or soften many of the provisions of the Act. This may include continuing to allow individuals to keep existing policies beyond 2014, delaying the employer mandate for at least one more year, and flexibility in enforcing benefits, reporting, and other requirements.

The Administration will not show similar flexibility with regard to provider payments. In all likelihood, through regulation and policy guidance, the Administration will continue to “ratchet down” provider payments. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will continue to instruct the RACS to “rigidly” judge the appropriateness of payments, such as the need for rehabilitation or long term care hospital services, payments for observation days, and payments for short-term stays. In addition, CMS will continue to expand the use of site-neutral payments.

Financial Services
Although regulators have done a significant amount of rulemaking to implement the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank), the effort is far from complete. In fact, of the 315 rulemaking and 145 study and reporting provisions required under Dodd-Frank, only forty percent have been finalized. Consequently, we expect 2014 to be a significant year for regulatory activity. Congress will continue its oversight of these efforts, while also considering new financial services legislation.

Regulatory Action
The Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) is expected to designate additional entities as systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs) in 2014. Based on a recent report from Treasury’s Office of Financial Research on the perceived structural weaknesses of the asset management industry, the FSOC may soon consider whether to apply the SIFI label to individual asset managers. However, the industry has strongly contested the report’s findings, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) asked for public comment on the matter in October 2013.

The SEC is moving forward with Dodd-Frank implementation but is also juggling other rulemaking priorities. For example, the SEC has proposed rules to reform money market mutual funds (MMMFs). The proposed rule would require that prime MMMFs either adopt a floating net asset value or adopt liquidity fees and redemption gates in order to reduce perceived vulnerabilities to heavy redemptions during times of market stress. MMMF reform will remain an area of strong disagreement in 2014.

Meanwhile, federal banking regulators continue to focus on ensuring the high quality and quantity of capital for insured depository institutions. The liquidity coverage ratio is expected to be finalized and a net stable funding ratio may be proposed in 2014. The two ratios will require large banks and their holding companies to maintain a minimum amount of liquid assets to withstand a 30-day and one year liquidity stress scenarios. This work is being conducted while the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision is in the midst of negotiating additional changes to bank capital ratios with a focus on the asset component of capital. In addition, the federal banking regulators and the SEC are expected to finalize the credit risk retention rule, which was reproposed late last year in response to concerns about the rule’s potential effect on the securitization markets.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has finalized the controversial qualified mortgage rule, released simplified mortgage disclosure forms, and significantly increased enforcement actions against nonbank market participants, such as student loan servicers and payday lenders. We expect the CFPB to continue its aggressive enforcement agenda in fields such as debt collection and prepaid cards.

Additionally, the Department of Labor (DOL) is expected to release its fiduciary definition reproposal in the second half of 2014, after much delay. The initial 2010 proposal, which would have dramatically changed the regulatory definition that has been in place since 1975, was retracted after intense criticism.

Finally, 2014 will be a significant year marked by a number of high-level agency personnel changes now that confirmations have been unlocked.  Congressman Mel Watt (D-NC) will be sworn in as the next director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) in January and early indications suggest that his tenure will be markedly different from his predecessor. In addition, new leadership at the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the Federal Reserve, and recent changes at the SEC and Treasury mean that new perspectives on financial reform may soon emerge.  New leadership presents opportunities for stakeholder engagement.

Congressional Action
Congress will also continue its traditional oversight over the federal financial regulators in 2014, presenting opportunities for engagement on all of these issues. Oversight committees will focus  their efforts on reviewing the implementation of final rules, such as the Volcker Rule and the qualified mortgage rule, and will also heavily scrutinize controversial entities such as the CFPB and FSOC. With the 2014 elections looming, oversight hearings and Congressional inquiries may also lay the groundwork for the future direction of financial regulatory reform.

Momentum on housing reform will continue in 2014. First, significant changes are expected to the bipartisan GSE reform bill, S. 1217 (Corker-Warner), which would wind down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and replace those entities with a new government guarantor, modeled after the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). After significant vetting last year, Chairman Tim Johnson (D-SD) and Ranking Member Mike Crapo (R-ID) are expected to introduce a revised version for mark up in late January. A lively mark-up is expected. In the House, the Protecting American Taxpayers and Homeowners Act (the PATH Act), which was reported out of Committee in 2013, has an uncertain future unless significant changes are introduced to include some form of a government guarantee on mortgage-backed securities. In the meantime, we are closely watching Ranking Member Maxine Waters’ office for a competing proposal that will use the Corker-Warner bill as an approximate roadmap.

As work continues on tax reform, Congress could consider proposals narrowing or eliminating retirement security preferences, such as capping tax-preferred contributions to such accounts to the lower of $20,000 or 20% of income or limiting the total that can be amassed in tax-favored retirement plans. House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Camp (R-MI) has also released a discussion draft on the taxation of financial products that has been endorsed by various Democrats, calling for mark-to-market tax treatment of derivatives and changing the cost basis of securities.

Patent Reform
The prospect for legislation to help curb abusive patent troll litigation looks promising in 2014.

House Legislation
On December 5th, the House passed H.R. 3309, the “Innovation Act of 2013” by an impressive bipartisan vote of 325 to 91. The bill was introduced by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) and would, among other things, require plaintiffs to provide more information in their pleadings about the infringed patents and ownership of the patents; limit discovery costs; allow manufacturers to intervene in suits against their customers and stay the suits against the customers; and clarify the current patent law allowing prevailing parties to recover their legal costs.

Senate Legislation
On the Senate side, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) have introduced S. 1720, the “Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013”. The bill is not as far-reaching as the Goodlatte bill, but includes a number of similar provisions, including ones to increase transparency in patent ownership and allow stays of suits against customers. Senators John Cornyn (R-TX) and Orrin Hatch (R-UT) have introduced separate bills that deal with fee-shifting and other issues.  Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) also has introduced a bill that would expand the current “covered business method” program to include all CBM patents.

On December 17th, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on patent troll litigation abuses.  During the hearing, Chairman Leahy said that he believes legislation is necessary and touted his bill as one that provides for a “balanced and targeted” approach that addresses abuses while preserving the rights of legitimate patent holders, and urged his fellow committee members “to stay focused on that balance, so that we achieve meaningful, but targeted reform.” A large majority of the Committee members made it clear that they too agreed that abusive patent troll litigation is a problem that Congress needs to address. A majority also appeared to support S. 1730.

However, several Democrats expressed concerns that it went too far, while Senator Schumer and Republicans said it did not go far enough. These Senators called for changes in the bill.  In response, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), who is a co-sponsor of S. 1730, observed that the House passed a strong bill, but legislation still needs to get through the Senate, and so urged both Committee members and witnesses “to be as flexible as you can be to get a bill through the Senate” and to conference with the House. Assuming his colleagues heed his advice, the chances of a bill passing the Senate and House and Senate conferees resolving the differences between their respective bills looks good. The Administration also supports legislation.

Regulatory and Executive Action
The recent Senate rules changes and the recent hiring of John Podesta as counselor to President Obama will likely result in increased regulatory activity by the executive branch.

Senate Rule Changes
As a point of background, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) recently changed the Senate rules to lower the threshold for confirming executive branch nominees from 60 votes to a simple majority. The change will make it far easier to confirm nominees and subsequently should allow the Obama Administration to implement federal regulations at a faster pace.

John Podesta
Additionally, the hiring of John Podesta is reportedly intended to help Obama expand his policy agenda through executive action. More specifically, Podesta is expected to focus his attention on environmental and climate change issues through regulatory coordination with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The expectation is that Podesta will push hard to further Obama’s goals of curbing U.S. carbon emissions, especially since Congress appears unwilling to act on climate change legislation. 

Podesta’s approach is illustrated in the opening letter of a 2010 report from the Center for American Progress, where he served as President and CEO. His letter in the report, which is titled, “The Power of the President: Recommendations to Advance Progressive Change,” lists executive orders, rulemaking, agency management, and public-private partnerships (P3) as some of the means by which a President can exercise his authority and pursue his agenda. Podesta further illustrates his perspective on executive action when he writes, “Congressional gridlock does not mean the federal government stands still. This [Obama] administration has [an] opportunity to use available executive authorities while also working with Congress where possible.”

The report provides an indication of where the Administration might direct their focus in the energy and environmental areas. For example, it calls for potential fees on imported oil, an executive order to require the General Services Administration (GSA) to increase the percentage of federal vehicles using non-oil based fuel, an EPA ruling to require metropolitan bus fleets to increase their use of low-polluting fuel, continued EPA emphasis on retiring coal-fired power plants and cutting toxic mercury emissions, and an increased focus on the incorporation of alternative fuels and clean energy within U.S. military operations.

While the report provides an indication of where the Administration may focus their efforts, we know that some major regulatory rulings are already scheduled for this year. For example, the Interior Department is scheduled to issue a ruling on hydraulic fracturing in May, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is scheduled to issue a ruling on the use of civilian aircraft drones in May, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is scheduled to issue a ruling on power plant emissions this June.

As federal agencies and regulators address these issues, there are opportunities for stakeholders to engage.

As this memo makes clear, the combined factors of the 2013 budget deal, the recent Senate rules changes, and the appointment of John Podesta would seem to increase the likelihood for both legislative and regulatory action even during an election year. While it’s certainly reasonable to expect that legislative and regulatory action may begin to slow as Congress gets closer to the election in November, it’s important to engage lawmakers and regulators early in 2014 to ensure that you are influencing the policymaking process when it matters most and before it is too far developed. And remember, there is always the possibility – if not an almost certainty – that a lame duck session will occur to complete Congressional work in 2014.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© K&L Gates LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

K&L Gates LLP

K&L Gates LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.