A Key Difference Between the DTSA and UTSA: “Continued Misappropriation” Continues to be a Viable Claim

by Fisher Phillips

The Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”), unapologetically, was modeled after the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“UTSA”) in many respects. For background, the DTSA is the federal statute, enacted in 2016, that creates a federal private right of action for misappropriation of trade secrets. The UTSA is a model statute that has been adopted, in various forms with many variations, in 48 states and the District of Columbia.

One of the key distinctions between the two is the DTSA’s ex parte seizure remedy. Another less well known difference, and one that is being newly addressed in federal courts, is the treatment of continued misappropriation that begins prior to the enactment of the statute. The UTSA expressly addresses this situation and does not permit it. Section 11 states that the UTSA does not apply to “continuing misappropriation that occurs after the effective date.” The DTSA, by contrast, is silent on this issue. This has led to disputes in recent DTSA cases.

In Brand Energy v. Irex Contracting Group, the court was presented with this exact issue. In that case, certain employees of the plaintiff allegedly conspired to steal the plaintiff’s trade secrets in a coordinated effort over the course of years to drive the plaintiff out of business. In pertinent part, the employees/defendants allegedly misappropriated trade secrets in 2014 and 2015, prior to the DTSA’s May 11, 2016 enactment. Even more importantly, the employees allegedly misappropriated and continued to use plaintiff’s trade secrets after the enactment of the DTSA and to the present day.

The defendants moved to dismiss the DTSA claim because the allegedly wrongful conduct occurred before the DTSA was enacted. They also moved to dismiss on constitutional grounds, claiming that the application of the DTSA amounted to an ex post facto law. The court found neither argument convincing.

First, the court held that the plaintiff had stated a claim for misappropriation under the “use” prong of the DTSA. The DTSA permits misappropriation claims based on improperly “acquired” trade secrets or trade secrets that are “use[d]” or “disclose[d]” by improper means. Here, the court held that the plaintiff had alleged “multiple instances” where the defendants allegedly “used” plaintiff’s trade secrets after the enactment of the DTSA, which was sufficient.

Next, the court addressed the constitutional argument. It needed to determine that (1) Congress did not expressly prescribe the DTSA’s reach and (2) Congress intended the temporal reach using normal rules of statutory construction. The court first determined that Congress did not expressly prescribe the reach of the DTSA. Section 2(e) of the DTSA states that it applies to “misappropriation of a trade secret … for which any act occurs on or after [May 11, 2016].” The provision includes important qualifying language. It does not simply state that claims must be for misappropriation after the May 11, 2016; rather, it allows misappropriations claims “for which any act” occurs after May 11, 2016. By permitting claims based on any act occurring after May 11, 2016, the DTSA opens the door to claims based on a pattern or misappropriation or continuing misappropriation where at least one act occurred after the enactment of the DTSA.

The court also found that Congress intended this temporal reach based on its statutory construction of the statute. As stated previously, the UTSA has a provision expressly prohibiting continuing misappropriation claims that begins with an act of misappropriation prior to the enactment of the statute, whereas the DTSA is silent on this issue. This was not a mistake. The court reasoned that Congress was well aware of the UTSA and its provisions and “borrowed heavily” from the UTSA in multiple respects. Its exclusion of this provision from the DTSA was “revealing” and “clearly expressed” Congressional intent to permit continuing misappropriation claims that began prior to and continued after the DTSA’s enactment.

The court was not alone in its holding and joined the two other district courts that have addressed this issue and come to the same conclusion: Syntel Sterling v. Trizetto and Adams Arms v. Unified Weapon.

In sum, Brand Energy serves a number of important lessons for businesses and litigators. One, continued misappropriation claims appear to be viable under the DTSA so long as they are well pleaded and include allegations of continued use of trade secrets after the enactment of the DTSA. It is possible that such claims will still be subject to a motion to dismiss, but based on growing case law, it appears that such a challenge to a properly drafted complaint will be unsuccessful. Two, it serves as a reminder that the DTSA is not the UTSA and that there are key differences that should be analyzed and considered when bringing a trade secrets claim. Finally, as the DTSA gets older, the impact of this case law is expected to decrease since claims will not include pre-enactment misappropriation. Nevertheless, in the nascent stages of the DTSA, it remains a very real possibility and should be top of mind for any new case.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Fisher Phillips | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Fisher Phillips

Fisher Phillips on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.