Readers will recall our surprise that so much of the rule-making under ACA § 1557 addressed transgender issues. We now have decisions from two federal district courts taking polar opposite positions on whether § 1557 prohibits such discrimination. Franciscan Alliance, Inc. v. Burwell, 227 F.Supp.3d 660 (N.D. Tex. 2016) said that it does not; Prescott v. Rady Children’s Hospital – San Diego, S.D. Cal. No. 16-cv-02408 (Doc. 22, Sept. 27, 2017) affirmed that it does. Both can’t be correct.
The California decision reasoned from the premise that Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits transgender discrimination, citing decisions to that effect from the Sixth, Seventh, Ninth and Eleventh Circuit Courts of Appeal. Because other Circuits take the opposing view, the dispute may be resolved by the U.S. Supreme Court soon. Notably, the Department of Justice on October 4, 2017 switched sides in this fight, taking the view expressed by the Texas court.
IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE
Thank you for your interest in our information on the current status of Affordable Care Act and its implementation. While we are happy to provide you our best information and analysis of the regulations promulgated by the Internal Revenue Service, please be advised that the contents and conclusions contained in this article and any email communication are introductory and educational in nature and do not express a formal, enforceable opinion. Nothing contained in this article and any email communication is intended to be used, or relied upon by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding taxation and penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code. Any statement contained in this article and any email communication relating to any federal tax issue may not be used by any person to support the promotion, marketing of, or used to recommend any transaction for the purpose of avoiding taxation or penalties.
