Mommy’s Bliss Baby Cold Treatment Claims in Time Out

Johnson & Johnson challenges numerous product lines before NAD

Rival Johnson & Johnson (J&J) prevails over Mommy’s Bliss.

In two simultaneous inquiries, J&J took Mommy’s Bliss – a homespun baby medicine company – to task at the National Advertising Division (NAD or the Division). At issue were several claims about two product lines.

Gripes of Wrath

First up, the oxymoronically named Mommy’s Bliss Gripe Water.

For those who don’t know what gripe water is, it’s a nonprescription treatment for fussy babies that has a long and volatile history. Developed in the 19th century by an English pharmacist, gripe water has included many disparate ingredients over the decades – alcohol, sugar, herbs and more – and has been the target of interdiction by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

J&J had problems with a number of ad claims made by Mommy’s Bliss regarding the product, including performance, speed of action and novelty claims.

Mommy’s Bliss cited “overwhelming anecdotal support” for the claims regarding the speed of the water’s effect, evidence that the NAD has declared, with agreement from the Federal Trade Commission, had “insufficient support for product performance claims absent a showing that the experience of the individual consumers is representative of the experience of consumers generally with the product.”

J&J maintained that the novelty claims – that the product was the “Very First in the U.S.” – were given the lie by numerous U.S. patent applications describing similar products.

Cough Syrup

Next up: a bevy of cough syrups and probiotic drops – diet supplements for kids. J&J objected to a number of claims that the products would make babies feel better and relieve cough symptoms. Additionally, several claims, including that the product would “ease baby’s cold symptoms,” was a “sick baby toolkit” and was suitable “for when cold & flu season hits,” conveyed the message that the products were “as effective as FDA-regulated drug products” to treat coughs, cold and flu.

The NAD took exception to Mommy’s Bliss’ general claims about making sick children “feel better” along with the specific cough relief claims, which it argued were unsupported by any evidence and should be discontinued. (Mommy’s Bliss informed the NAD that it had discontinued the claims that triggered comparisons with FDA-regulated products, so they were not considered in the investigation.)

Claims made about the probiotic drops failed, according to the Division, because the studies Mommy’s Bliss provided were conducted on groups that were not the target audience for the products. Claims for the syrups and drops including “pediatrician recommended” and “recommended by pediatricians nationwide” were also put on the chopping block.

Back to the gripe water – all of Mommy’s Bliss’ claims about the product were shot down by the NAD. In the case of the novelty “first in the U.S.” claims, the NAD noted a mismatch between the narrow definition that the company placed its product within (“gripe water products that did not contain sucrose or petroleum by-products and that were distributed by American companies”) and the general claims, which did not follow the narrow definition.

The NAD found that the rest of the claims regarding speed of action, performance and doctor recommendations were unsupported by the available evidence.

The Takeaway

It was a long day for Mommy’s Bliss, but when the dust settled, it agreed to comply with the NAD’s recommendations. The lesson, one we often reiterate here, is to have sound and sufficient substantiation for your advertising claims or risk being challenged by competitors and regulators.

NAD Investigations Keep Getting Meta and Meta

Influencer ad platform accused of false advertising; space-time continuum collapses

Not All Fun and Games

It’s true that most social media influencers are relatively below the radar for above-the-radar types; dependable experts in a particular field or successful practitioners of a certain art or skill, they attract attention that can be parlayed into sales and brand loyalty.

But there are, of course, the influencers who draw followers because of their over-the-top behavior or outrageous lifestyles. We write about this type of influencer all the time – it’s fun, and often allows us to indulge in a little schadenfreude.

Whether it’s expert advice or over-the-top behavior that attracts the marketing dollars, there’s a lot of behind-the-scenes effort that goes into influencer marketing. And we don’t mean just primping or selfie-taking; there’s also the business end, which is complicated.

Enter the influencer marketing platforms (IMPs).

Apples and Kardashians

IMPs purport to help businesses find influencers who are trustworthy and lucrative, monitor the operation of their campaigns, keep the ads aboveboard and otherwise assist with compliance, and measure success and awareness – it’s a mountain of effort that would otherwise cost a company significant time and money in-house.

MLW Squared, which does business as Ahalogy (get it?), is an IMP offering a solution it has dubbed the “tri-verified influencer marketing platform.”

The added value that Ahalogy claims for its platform addresses the often-deceptive or opaque nature of influencer advertising. In a world with fake influencers, how does a company know whether its influencer campaign is effective? How can it tell whether the money it spends on influencers stacks up against traditional ad dollars?

“Partnering with third-party verification solutions will be the first of many steps taken to correct the uncertainty that currently resides in the influencer marketing space,” claims a 2017 press release announcing the arrival of Ahalogy’s platform. The company claims that a tri-verified IMP uses just such third-party analysis to determine whether the ad traffic is high-quality and the metrics are sound.

Ahalogy’s marketing claims for its platform were challenged before the NAD by Collective Bias, an IMP that competes with the company.

At the center of the challenge lies the difference between promoted and native posts. Promoted posts are paid-for content, easily tracked and assessed by third parties. But the efficacy of native posts – content posted by influencers on their personal social media accounts – is much harder to judge. Collective Bias accused Ahalogy of promising the accuracy associated with promoted content when tracking and assessing native posts.

The NAD held that “the advertiser’s broad and unqualified claims that the Tri-Verified platform – and its integrated third-party verification service – allows for influencer marketing campaigns to be ‘100% verified’ and can guarantee that ‘impressions, traffic and other key engagement measures are valid,’ reasonably suggests to consumers that its platform is able to verify 100% of all social media content ….”

Even though the company had used the term “paid media” in its advertising, the NAD maintained that the claims were not narrowed to promoted posts only. In addition, the Division found that Ahalogy had made claims that the platform was able to detect influencer fraud.

The Takeaway

The NAD’s final recommendation split the difference – Ahalogy could either abandon the “100% verified” claims or modify the claims to make it clear that they applied only to promoted posts. Ahalogy agreed to comply with all the Division’s recommendations.

All this summons up a nightmare scenario: Someday soon, influencer marketing will require a platform to provide third-party verification of the claims made by IMPs.

Mind. Blown.

Dealerships Have Quarter-Billion-Dollar False Ad Suit Trimmed

Car sales armada can proceed with disgorgement under Lanham Act

Catalog of (Dealer) Ships

A ginormous horde of car dealerships sued TrueCar Inc. in the Southern District of New York back in March 2015.

How many car dealerships, you ask? More than 100 from across the country; the list of plaintiffs takes up 28 pages of the original 65-page complaint, and if stretched end to end, would threaten to cover the ocean and to blot out the sun from the eyes of man.


What is TrueCar accused of, that would merit the arrival of such an array of enemies on its shores?

Referral Madness?

The defendant is a website that refers consumers (attracted by web, TV and print ads) to car dealerships and lists available cars and pricing information.

However, the dealers allege that TrueCar engaged in underhanded advertising, telling consumers that they could purchase vehicles at TrueCar-listed dealerships without negotiation at “guaranteed” low costs. Among other tactics, the suit claims, consumers were offered a printable “price certificate” to bring with them to dealerships.

Let’s just say this got the dealers a little bent out of shape. By their account, consumers were showing up expecting prices and a process that the dealers could not deliver. The dealers had never promised a no-haggle sales process or any sort of guaranteed price. In many cases, they claimed, consumers would arrive seeking TrueCar-listed vehicles that were out of stock or were being offered at prices or financing terms different from TrueCar’s “locked-in price.”

The dealers charged TrueCar with false advertising under the Lanham Act and unfair competition and deceptive practices under a plethora of state laws. In addition to accusing TrueCar of allegedly making false no-haggle claims, the dealers accused the website of bait-and-switch advertising as well as false factory invoice claims, false financing claims, false transparency claims and false rebate claims.

The dealers sought monetary relief to the tune of $250 million (!) as well as an injunction against the offending advertising.


TrueCar pushed back with a motion for summary judgment in July 2018, claiming, among other things, that the dealers had failed to prove that they had suffered any injury. And in its recent opinion regarding the motion, the Southern District agreed. (State law claims were not challenged in the motion.)

“Plaintiffs’ deposition testimony describes only vague, general perceptions of injury,” the court held. “If credited, plaintiffs’ evidence would not be sufficient for a reasonable trier of fact to find a link between TrueCar’s advertisements and any injury to the plaintiffs.”

This argument was based on the court’s assertion that the dealers competed with other dealers – but not with TrueCar. “A sale made through TrueCar is not necessarily a sale lost by a plaintiff dealership, as opposed to some other competing dealership in the same market,” the court claimed. “At most, the testimony offered by plaintiffs describes witnesses’ perceptions of the ads’ falseness and why the false statements could be material to consumers’ buying choices, but they do not identify discernable injury to the dealerships linked to TrueCar’s advertisements.”

The Takeaway

Before shutting down the case altogether, though, the court left room for the dealers to continue the effort.

Based in part on communications between TrueCar executives and its corporate counsel, the dealers argued that the company willfully violated the Lanham Act – which merited disgorgement of TrueCar’s profits as a remedy.

Here’s one example: An alleged 2013 email from TrueCar’s counsel to the company’s CEO stated that he “strongly [advised] against using the phrase ‘negotiation-free’ in any form in our ads or other self-attributed public communications … In my view it is a much greater risk than we should bear at this point.” The CEO allegedly responded, “I am inclined to take some practical risk here.”

And so, while the bulk of the Lanham Act charges were left in the lot, the case will still be taken out for a spin. “Because plaintiffs have come forward with evidence that TrueCar acted against the advice of counsel and willfully ran false advertisements,” the court held, “the summary judgment motion is denied as to a disgorgement-based remedy.”

Listen to your counsel, folks!

Arkansas State House Contemplates Bill Restricting Riced-Veggie Labels

But does this put the rice industry in a double bind with its own rice milk product?

Carb Fatigue

Low-carb diets, including the “paleo” subgenus, have spawned some strange species of recipe. Parsnip fries, squash hash browns, cloud bread (made from eggs and cream cheese) and zucchini noodles instead of pasta (blasphemy!) all have had their 15 minutes of fame.

But the replacement of an entire staple food with a low-carb alternative is a category shift that’s bound to raise eyebrows and maybe even rile a temper or two.

If you’re a regular reader, you’re familiar with the epic milk controversy that’s raged for more than 20 years now. As a story, it possesses a certain Dickensian sweep, so please, spare us carpal tunnel and read about it here.

For the purposes of this article, we’ll simply note that the folks who produce milk don’t take kindly to the wide variety of vegetable-, seed- and nut-derived dairy substitutes that have crashed the market. But until now, despite some recent rumblings, federal authorities have been unable or unwilling to weigh in.

Verbing Weirds Language

But just when you were getting tired of the endless slosh of the milk wars, a new conflict is opening over another basic kitchen staple: rice.

Adherents of popular low-carb diets can’t consume rice, which is packed with carbohydrates; to compensate, they’ve exercised their considerable culinary inventiveness to create a number of alternatives, cauliflower rice being the most well-known.

And while there’s plenty of information out there on how to create veggie-derived rice from scratch, vegetable companies have introduced prepackaged “riced” veggies to capitalize on the trend. (No matter how much it galls us, “rice” seems to be becoming a legitimate verb.)

Care to guess how the rice industry feels about this development? Let’s just say it is not keen on the trend, and Big Rice – that’s now a thing – has found allies in at least one corner of the country. Arkansas State Rep. David Hillman and Arkansas State Sen. Bruce Maloch recently introduced a bill to cut through rice-related nomenclature debates.

House Bill 1407 would prohibit representing agricultural products “as rice when the agricultural product is not rice” and “affixing a label that uses a variation of rice in the name of the agricultural product when the agricultural product is not rice or derived from rice.”

There are similar prohibitions in the bill regarding meat generally and pork and beef in particular. (As if you needed another link – check out our article on Indiana’s effort to corral synthetic meat labeling. We’re on top of this, folks.)

The Takeaway

All of this effort might be for naught – a recent milk case in the Ninth Circuit found that federal labeling requirements superseded state regulation. We’ll see whether federal guidance on cauliflower rice or any of the other variants is released.

But, Big Rice, beware – rice milk is a product that’s taken its place beside oat milk, almond milk and the other combatants in dairy’s own Twenty Years’ War. Can Big Rice quash the aspirations of cauliflower rice products while championing its own milk substitute?

StarKist Gets a Heart-Check Gut Check

Class action alleges American Heart Association logo is a paid endorsement

Sorry, Charlie

When New York resident Abraham Warner filed suit against tuna giant StarKist Co. for its packaging art, it wasn’t over its beatnik-inspired mascot, Charlie the Tuna.

The offending decoration on the StarKist can – Warner purchased StarKist Low Sodium Solid White Albacore Tuna in Water, in case you’re curious – is the “Heart-Check mark,” an infographic promoted by the American Heart Association (AHA). According to the AHA, the mark is “a simple tool to help you Eat Smart. When you see it, you can be confident that a product aligns with the American Heart Association’s recommendations for an overall healthy eating pattern.”

While there are nutrient-, sodium- and fat-level requirements for products bearing the mark, the complaint asserts that the logo’s popularity is due to more commercial preoccupations.

Smells Fishy?

Warner claims that companies must pay the AHA to use the mark on their packaging and that “the AHA makes a significant profit off the sale of rights to use the Heart-Check Mark.”

Furthermore, the claim alleges, the AHA actively promotes the commercial appeal of the mark. Warner quotes AHA materials describing the Heart-Check mark: “Shoppers want clear, simple purchase guidance from a trusted source. The American Heart Association heart-check mark increases product sales because seeing the mark on a package assures shoppers they are making a smart choice.”

Unfortunately for StarKist, argues Warner, the inclusion of the mark on the product label violates state and federal laws because it fails to disclose that the mark is an endorsement the company paid for – #Sponsored! According to rules published by the FDA, for instance, “a statement should be included in close proximity to the claim, informing consumers that the organization or individual was compensated for the endorsement.”

Warner says that the paid mark, which was used without explanation on at least 13 of StarKist’s products, artificially raised the price of the goods.

The Takeaway

With that argument, Warner filed against StarKist in the Northern District of New York in April 2018, alleging deceptive acts or practices and false advertising under New York General Business Law and false or misleading labeling under the New York Agriculture and Markets Law. He sought injunctive and monetary relief.

StarKist filed to dismiss in May 2018, arguing in part that the mark was not misleading because it accurately conveyed the endorsement, an argument whose ship had sailed. “The complaint adequately alleges that StarKist pays an annual fee to use the Heart-Check Mark but omits this fact from its labels,” the court’s opinion maintained.

But the court sided with StarKist when responding to the request for injunctive relief. “Warner does not expressly allege that he is at risk of future injury. Moreover, Warner is now aware that StarKist pays the AHA to place the Heart-Check Mark on its labels.” The court held that this meant there was no real and immediate threat of future injury to justify injunctive relief.

So this case sails along, for now at least.

Check Out Our Latest Blog Posts

What’s in the Box? FTC Solicits Public Comments Regarding Video Game Loot Boxes Amidst Uncertainty

Imagine you are playing golf, badly, and at the fourth hole a caddy appears out of nowhere with a large box and an offer. In exchange for $20, you can open the box, which may contain high-tech clubs to improve your game, fashionable new gloves or a voucher for a free round. Perhaps you hesitate, uncertain whether paying $20 will be worth the potential reward, but those new golf clubs are tempting. Now imagine a similar offer, but digital and within one of your favorite mobile games, where items are nontangible and there is more uncertainty around reusability. In the gaming world, these offers are referred to as “loot boxes.” Read more and subscribe here.

Fifth Annual Data Security Incident Response Report and Webinar – Managing Enterprise Risks in a Digital World

This year’s report provides metrics from the 750+ potential incidents our team led clients through in 2018, as well as “Take Action” segments that feature insights from our team on key response items. Because it is our Report’s fifth year, we included a special section that provides a five-year trend summary on core incident response metrics. Download the report here and register to attend our webinar here.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© BakerHostetler | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


BakerHostetler on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at:

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.