Administration Withdraws Transgender Guidance While Considering Legal Issues

Franczek P.C.
Contact

Franczek Radelet P.C.

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and Department of Education (DOE) jointly issued a statement rescinding the guidance on transgender students’ rights under Title IX issued to school districts nationwide in May. The prior administration’s guidance had confirmed that the DOJ and DOE interpreted a student’s “sex” to include gender identity, or that person’s subjective or internal gender. The guidance had said that prohibiting transgender students’ use of bathrooms that align with their gender identity violates Title IX. The DOE and DOJ now state they will not rely on the views expressed in the prior guidance.

The guidance withdrawal comes as the Supreme Court is set to hear arguments in the landmark case of G.G. v. Gloucester County School Board on March 28, 2017. In G.G., a high school student whose birth-assigned sex is female but whose gender identity is male sued his Virginia high school to gain unrestricted bathroom access. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals decided the case in favor of the student based on the DOE’s interpretation of Title IX that is now withdrawn. Because the DOE’s interpretation was central to the case, the justices have the option of sending the case back to the lower court for further review.

The letter issued on February 22 states that the withdrawal of the prior transgender guidance does not diminish the protections from bullying and harassment available to all students. According to the letter, “schools must ensure that all students, including LGBT students, are able to learn and thrive in a safe environment.” In addition to federal law, Illinois law protects students from bullying on the basis of gender-related identity or expression.

The DOE and DOJ letter raises as many questions as it answers. Withdrawing the prior guidance does not preclude school districts from allowing bathroom or locker room access to transgender students, but indicates that the DOE and DOJ will not require or enforce access under Title IX. Also, it does not prevent parents or students from pursuing private litigation asserting that Title IX or state law requires schools to allow bathroom or locker room access.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Franczek P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Franczek P.C.
Contact
more
less

Franczek P.C. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.