Advertising Law

by Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

In This Issue:

NAD Decision Offers Reminder About Use of Before and After Pictures

“Before” and “after” photos can provide powerful imagery for advertisers. But a recent decision from the National Advertising Division emphasizes that such photos are product performance claims which must be supported by substantiation.

The issue arose in a challenge brought by Coty Inc. against competitor Ontel Products Corporation, the maker of Pink Armor nail gel. On product packaging as well as in broadcast, print, and Internet advertising, Ontel used “before” and “after” product demonstrations and made express claims such as “Rock Hard Finish” and “Guaranteed to transform cracked, brittle and weak nails into healthy, stronger, brighter nails with just one coat, once a week.”

Coty argued the “before” and “after” photographs—which featured short and visibly damaged or diseased fingernails in the “before” picture, that were transformed in the “after” picture into perfectly manicured, shiny, pink, and noticeably longer nails—deceptively misrepresented the rate at which nails grow and implied Pink Armor was capable of healing diseased fingernails.

Ontel responded that the photographs were not misleading because of a disclaimer that the images were “dramatizations,” which customers are accustomed to seeing in advertising. The other challenged statements were puffery, the advertiser said.

Reviewing the ads, the NAD noted that Ontel provided no substantiation for the “before” and “after” pictures other than customer testimonials. But endorsements and testimonials cannot replace reliable evidence—such as product testing—as support for advertising claims, the NAD said.

“Regardless of how heartfelt the testimonials of the users in the commercial (or those of satisfied customers on are, they are no substitute for reliable product testing demonstrating that customers who use the product as instructed will achieve results similar to the nails depicted in the ‘after’ photos on the product packaging and in the commercial.” And while dramatizations are “an acceptable means of conveying a message, [they] must nonetheless be accurate and substantiated.”

Ontel’s use of the “dramatization” disclaimer “does not insulate it from its responsibility to provide evidence that consumers will typically achieve nails similar to those depicted in the ‘after’ photograph when using the product according to its instructions,” the NAD said. As the advertiser failed to provide any evidence in support of the “after” images, the use of the “before and “after” pictures should be discontinued, the NAD recommended.

Two other product performance claims—“Your nails won’t peel, chip or crack no matter what the attack” and “Guaranteed to transform cracked, brittle and weak nails into healthy, stronger, brighter nails with just one coat, once a week”—met a similar fate.

“Regardless of how often applied or the number of coats, the advertiser has failed to provide any product testing to support the challenged performance claims,” the NAD wrote.

On a positive note for the advertiser, the NAD said the statements “Rock Hard Finish” and “With just one coat, once a week, it’s like getting a professional nail treatment at home!” constituted permissible advertiser puffing because no consumers would expect their nails to be hard as a rock.

To read the NAD’s press release about the decision, click here.

Why it matters: The decision serves as a reminder that “before” and “after” photographs are considered product performance claims. As such, “they must be supported, accurate and representative of the level of product efficacy that a reasonable consumer can expect to achieve,” the NAD wrote. “Further, actual product testing is the most direct and affirmative means by which to assess a product’s performance capability.”

FTC Schedules “Big Data” Workshop

Mark your calendar for September 15. The Federal Trade Commission has scheduled the  “Big Data: A Tool for Inclusion or Exclusion?” workshop that will explore the use of big data and its impact, including the impact on low-income and underserved customers.

“Big Data” is a hot topic for the FTC and Chairwoman Edith Ramirez voiced her concerns regarding the growing use of analytic techniques that companies use to categorize customers and make behavioral predictions.

“As part of the FTC’s ongoing work to shed light on the full scope of big data practices, our workshop will examine the potentially positive and negative effects of big data on low income and underserved populations,” she said in a statement.

Companies ranging from retailers to lead generators to financial institutions may categorize consumers “in ways that may affect them unfairly, or even unlawfully,” the FTC noted, perhaps by offering different prices or discounts to certain consumers or tailoring advertising for specific products.

To explore these issues in greater detail, the workshop will address how big data affects various populations, including specific questions such as:

  • How are organizations using big data to categorize consumers?

  • What benefits do consumers gain from these practices? Do these practices raise consumer protection concerns?

  • What benefits do organizations gain from these practices? What are the social and economic impacts, both positive and negative, from the use of big data to categorize consumers?

  • How do existing laws apply to such practices? Are there gaps in the legal framework?

  • Are companies appropriately assessing the impact of big data practices on low-income and underserved populations? Should additional measures be considered?

In addition to the delineated questions, the FTC invited comments, reports, and original research on the issue. Although pre-workshop comments are due by August 15, the general comment period will last until October 15.

To read the FTC’s press release about the workshop, click here.

Why it matters: In the agency’s press release announcing the workshop, the benefits of big data were also noted.  They include “advances in medicine, education, and transportation” to “more effectively tailored advertisements.” But advertisers should be aware that the agency remains focused on big data and is concerned that such tailored advertisements may be illegal.

Talk to Us About Mobile Security, FTC Says

Have something to say about mobile security? The Federal Trade Commission is listening.

Following up on a June 2013 forum, “Mobile Security: Potential Threats and Solutions,” the agency is now soliciting input from the public. The forum covered a wide range of topics, such as privacy and security threats to consumers—both actual and potential—and the various roles the members in the mobile ecosystem play with regard to security concerns, which include, among others, app developers and telecommunications companies.

The FTC asked for additional feedback on four specific areas:

  • Secure platform design. The agency asked how platforms can balance development with potentially malicious or privacy-infringing third-party applications, and whether any particular design approaches have emerged as more or less effective than others in achieving consumer privacy and security.

  • Secure distribution channels. What application review and testing methods have proven effective in detecting malicious applications, the FTC wondered, and do smaller players in the mobile realm have the resources to use such techniques? The agency is also curious as to whether limiting distribution of an application to a single channel offers security benefits.

  • Secure development practices. From a development perspective, the FTC queried whether consumers have the information they need to evaluate the security of a given application and whether there are ways to make security issues more transparent to end users.

  • Security life cycle and updates. What is the security life cycle of a mobile device, the agency asked, and what factors – such as policy, business, or technical – affect its length? Can a security life cycle be extended with updates? And do consumers have expectations about the security life cycle of their mobile devices?

The FTC will accept comments on the matter until May 30.

To read the FTC’s press release, click here.

Why it matters: Members of the mobile ecosystem are already aware of the agency’s focus after last year’s forum and a seminar earlier this year on mobile device tracking, a practice used by retailers to learn about consumers’ shopping habits – such as the length of time they spend on a given aisle or the frequency of their store visits – by using the unique identifiers from mobile devices. The FTC has indicated that a report on the subject of mobile security will be forthcoming.

Elvis Has Left the Building, but Not Beretta’s Ad Campaign

Hoping to capitalize on Elvis Presley’s fame, fortune, and fondness for guns, Italian firearms manufacturer Beretta launched an advertising campaign around the King’s imagery without consent, according to a new lawsuit filed by Presley’s estate.

Beretta developed a new shotgun for sporting clays, model 692, and created an Elvis-themed campaign to introduce it to the world. Describing the new gun as the “new legend in clay shooting,” Beretta advertised that Elvis would appear at events where the weapon was unveiled, including the largest gun show in the United States. “At every venue, Beretta had Elvis impersonators appear and/or perform and greet the gun enthusiasts attending such events,” according to the complaint, filed in Tennessee federal court. “In some cases, they had the Elvis impersonators pose with the weapons.”

Advertising posters featuring an image of a performer wearing an Elvis-style jumpsuit (and shooting vest and ear protectors) also attempted to associate the Beretta product with the performer, as did postings on the company’s Facebook page and other Internet sites, the estate claimed.

Gun enthusiasts and Elvis fans are aware of his interest in firearms and target shooting and the fact that he owned a Beretta firearm, the suit contended. “Beretta made a deliberate and intentional decision to tie its new product, model 692, to Elvis and trade on his popularity to generate as much publicity as possible when introducing model 692 to the public,” the complaint alleged.

The estate – noting that the Elvis name and image have been licensed for merchandise and advertisements for almost 60 years – sent a cease-and-desist letter to Beretta and filed suit after Beretta refused to pay compensation for its use of Elvis’s name and image.

The complaint alleges violations of the Lanham Act, as well as common law and Tennessee statutory publicity rights, and demands that Beretta remove all Elvis imagery and pay treble damages. 

To read the complaint in ABG EPE IP LLC v. Fabbrica d’Armi Pietro Beretta S.p.A., click here.

Why it matters: The use of celebrity likenesses without permission is a dangerous proposition for advertisers. Like Michael Jordan – who recently won the right to move forward in his publicity rights suit against a grocery store chain that allegedly traded on his rights in an ad commemorating his induction into the Basketball Hall of Fame – and Katherine Heigl – who just filed a $6 million suit against Duane Reade after the store tweeted an image of her carrying store-branded bags – celebrities (even deceased celebrities like Elvis) are quick to protect their publicity rights.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.