Next: Factor 6 - Competitor Defensive Positioning
Previous: Factor 4 - Business Delivery Model
This article forms one part of a broader decision framework for evaluating whether patent or trade secret protection is appropriate for AI innovation.
The framework is designed to help decision-makers (e.g., innovators, in house, CTOs) align patent and IP strategy with underlying business realities and moving beyond purely "legal" considerations.
Commercial longevity considers whether the AI innovation is likely to remain commercially relevant long enough to justify patent protection.
Innovations with short life cycles may not justify the time and cost of patenting, whereas durable capabilities that persist across product generations and address stable problem domains are stronger candidates. It is important to note that a patent can take several years to grant, and enforceable rights arise only after issuance.

Applying the Decision Tool: Patents or Trade Secrets
For a further discussion of the decision framework and remaining decision factors in the framework, please see the following:
Framework: Patents or Trade Secrets
Factor 1: Nature of AI Innovation
Factor 2: Enforceable Scope of Patent Protection
Factor 3: Reproducibility of AI Innovation
Factor 4: Business Delivery Model
Factor 6: Competitor Defensive Positioning
Factor 7: Patentability Potential and Layered Strategies