Amendments to the Federal Rules Outlined by Proposed Effective Dates

Locke Lord LLP

Locke Lord LLP

Amending the Federal Rules, including the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Federal Rules ‎of ‎Civil Procedure, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Federal Rules of Evidence, and ‎Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, generally takes about three years. The initial rendition ‎of a proposed change to the Federal Rules, known eponymously as the Preliminary Draft, is ‎published by the Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure (the “Standing Committee”) of ‎the Judicial Conference, and from there, proposed amendments make their way up to the United ‎States Supreme Court and finally to the United States Congress for final approval.‎1

Currently there are three different cycles of amendments to the Federal Rules, which will ‎become effective over the next couple of years. With a nod to an orderly “business as usual,” ‎amidst the chaos plaguing many of our actual businesses this year, the latest Preliminary Draft of ‎amendments to the Federal Rules was published in late August, and those amended rules are not ‎expected to become effective until December of 2022. First published in a Preliminary Draft ‎during late 2018, when Covid-19 wasn’t even a twinkle in the eyes of our over-burdened public ‎health system, the earliest amendments to the Federal Rules in the present cycle become effective ‎in December of this year. Outlined below are the pending amendments, organized broadly by ‎the year they will become effective, including summaries of the particular changes incorporated ‎into each amended rule.  ‎

December 1, 2020‎2

  • Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 35 and 40. ‎
    • Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(e) amendments clarify that the ‎length limits applicable to petitions for hearing or rehearing en banc also apply ‎to responses if requested by the court. ‎
    • Amendments to Rule 40(a) clarify that the provisions of ‎Rule 40(b) ‎regarding a petition for panel rehearing also ‎apply to a response to such a ‎petition, if the court orders a ‎response, and stylistically the amendment ‎changes the language to ‎refer to a “response,” rather than an “answer,” ‎consistent with Rule 35.‎
  • Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 2002, 2004, 8012‎
    • Federal Rule of Bankruptcy  Procedure 2002 amendments add cases filed ‎under chapters 12 and 13 to certain sub-sections, conform respective time ‎periods to the ‎deadlines for filing proofs of claim, and confirm that ‎transmittal of ‎notice of relevant deadlines to the U.S. trustee is still ‎required.‎
    • Amended Rule 2004 refers expressly to the production of electronically ‎stored ‎information, in addition to the general production of documents,‎ ‎and provides that subpoenas are now properly ‎issued from the court where ‎the bankruptcy case is pending ‎and by an attorney authorized to practice in ‎that court, regardless of where the Rule 2004 examination is to occur.‎
    • BR 8012 amendments conform to recent FRAP amendments, ‎‎encompassing nongovernmental corporations that seek to ‎intervene on ‎appeal, and expand corporate and other disclosure requirements on appeal. ‎
  • Federal Rule of Civil Rule 30‎
    • Amended Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) requires the serving ‎party and the named ‎organization to confer before, or promptly after, the ‎deposition is noticed and continue conferring as ‎necessary, regarding the ‎number and description of matters ‎for examination and the identity of ‎persons who will ‎testify.‎
  • Federal Rule of Evidence 404‎
    • Amendments to Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) impose additional notice ‎requirements on the prosecution ‎in a criminal case and incorporate ‎clarifications to the text and headings of the rule.‎

December 1, 2021‎3

  • Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 3 and 42 ‎
    • Rules 3 and 4, concomitantly with corresponding forms, are amended to ‎incorporate merger principles by including this language: “The notice of ‎appeal encompasses all orders that merge for ‎purposes of appeal into the ‎designated judgment or appealable order. It is not ‎necessary to designate ‎those orders in the notice of appeal.”‎ But the amended rule enables ‎deliberate limitations of the notice of appeal according to this language in ‎the amendment: “An appellant may designate only part of a judgment or ‎‎appealable order by expressly stating that the notice of appeal is so limited. ‎‎Without such an express statement, specific designations do not limit the ‎‎scope of the notice of appeal.”‎
    • Rule 42 is amended to require the circuit clerk to dismiss an appeal ‎if all ‎parties agree and to clarify that the requisite fees are court fees, not ‎attorney’s fees.‎
  • Bankruptcy Rules 2005, 3007, and 9036‎
    • Rule 2005 amendment clarifies intent to address attendance or ‎appearance ‎conditions at the relevant proceedings, not to impose penalties for failure ‎to appear.‎
    • Rule 3007 is amended to clarify that the special service method ‎required ‎by Rule 7004(h) may be used for service on insured depository ‎institutions, not on credit unions.‎
    • Amended Rule 9036 is “going green” by requiring certain high-volume ‎notice recipients currently being served with paper copies to switch to ‎electronic service. ‎

December 1, 2022‎4

  • Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 25‎
    • Amended Rule 25 would afford the same privacy protections in Railroad ‎Retirement cases as in Social Security cases by limiting access to ‎electronically stored filings. ‎
  • Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, Restyled Parts I and II; Rules 1007, 1020, 2009, ‎‎2012, 2015, 3002, 3010, 3011, 3014, 3016, 3017.1, 3017.2 (new), 3018, 3019, 5005, ‎‎7004, and 8023 ‎
    • Stylistic and conforming amendments included at length throughout Parts ‎I and II of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedures.‎
    • Amendments to Rules ‎1007, 1020, 2009, 2012, 2015, 3010-11, 3014, ‎‎3016, 3017.1 and 3017.2‎, 3018, and 3019 would create modified and new ‎procedures to govern cases consistent with enactment of the Small ‎Business Reorganization Act of 2019, which gives a small business debtor ‎the option of electing to be a ‎debtor under subchapter V of chapter 11.‎
    • Amended Rule 3002(c)(6) would allow an extension of time to file proofs ‎of claim for both domestic ‎and foreign creditors if “the notice was ‎insufficient under the circumstances to give the creditor ‎a reasonable time ‎to file a proof of claim.”‎
    • Proposed changes to Rule 5005 would ‎allow papers to be sent to the U.S. ‎trustee by electronic means, and would eliminate the ‎requirement that the ‎filed statement evidencing transmittal be verified.‎
    • ‎Proposed amendments to Rule 7004 clarify that when serving an agent of a corporation, ‎partnership or other unincorporated association, the agent's position or title may be used ‎instead of the  specific name, and if the recipient’s name is used, the name need not be ‎correct if service is made to the proper address and position or title.‎
    • Amended Rule 8023 clarifies that dismissal is mandatory upon agreement ‎by the parties.  ‎
  • Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 and Supplemental Rules for Social Security Review ‎Actions  
    • Rule 12 amendment allows 60 days to serve a responsive pleading for a ‎U.S. ‎officer or employee sued in an individual capacity for an ‎act or ‎omission in connection with duties ‎performed on behalf of the U.S., after ‎the court denies a Rule 12 motion or postpones its disposition until trial, in ‎order to afford adequate time for a potential collateral-order appeal when ‎the Rule 12 motion raises an official ‎immunity defense.‎‎
    • The Supplemental Rules establish a simplified ‎procedure for review of an ‎‎individual’s claims on a single administrative record. ‎These new rules ‎apply only to final decisions by ‎the Commissioner of Social Security.‎
  • Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16‎
    • Amendments to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16 specify the ‎required timing and content of expert witness disclosures, preserving the ‎reciprocal structure of the current rule.‎

As these anticipated amendments begin to go live at the end of this ‎year,‎5‎ Locke Lord is ‎available to answer questions about the changes to the Federal Rules and how those changes may ‎impact pending litigation in federal courts across the country.‎

1 See, e.g., infra note 2.‎
2 Congressional Package – April 2020; Supreme Court Package  – ‎October 2019; Standing Committee Report to the Judicial ‎Conference – September 2019; and Preliminary Draft of Proposed ‎Amendments to the Federal Rules –  August 2018
5 While these Federal Rule amendments are expected to go into effect as planned, they can be delayed for various ‎reasons or withdrawn entirely. Up-to-date federal rule and form changes are found in advisory committees' ‎most recent books and records. ‎

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Locke Lord LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Locke Lord LLP

Locke Lord LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.