Anatomy of a Protectable Slogan: JE SUIS CHARLIE versus THIS SICK BEAT

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Contact

[co-author: Lauriel F. Dalier]

In our 140-character world, slogans and rallying cries have become a popular shorthand to signify support for the emotion of the moment. As such slogans capture our national attention, it is virtually inevitable that the next day's news cycle contains at least one account of a party seeking trademark protection for phrases such as JE SUIS CHARLIE, HANDS UP DON'T SHOOT, BOSTON STRONG, and LET'S ROLL as a trademark. A commonly asked question is: how can someone obtain trademark rights in a slogan that has already become part of the common lexicon? And what is the difference between attempts to register JE SUIS CHARLIE, versus Taylor Swift's recent filing of 16 trademark applications for the mark THIS SICK BEAT (a catchy line from her song "Shake it Off")?

First, when it comes to phrases that are already in common parlance, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("Trademark Office") will typically refuse to register such phrases on the grounds that they do not indicate source. Particularly as typically used on T-shirts, mugs, and other merchandise, such slogans will be perceived as conveying an informational, social, political, religious, or similar kind of message versus indicating the source of the goods. The majority of applications for phrases that have obtained the status of common parlance are refused on these grounds.

In contrast, the Taylor Swift example refers to a phrase coined and popularized by the trademark applicant herself. The public already associates Swift as the source of the THIS SICK BEAT phrase, and merchandise bearing this phrase would similarly be assumed to emanate from or be associated with Swift.

Second, assuming an applicant, such as Swift, is able to circumvent an informational refusal, the Trademark Office will then consider how the mark is used on goods "in commerce." Trademarks must serve as a source indicator for goods. A large, dominant word mark, slogan, or design emblazoned on the front or back of a clothing item would likely be refused as ornamental because the perception would not be that of source indication. In contrast, the Trademark Office would be more likely to consider a mark placed on hang tags, the inside collar, the sleeve, or on the upper left breast or pocket area, as serving as a source identifier, versus dominating the overall appearance of the goods.

In short, it is certainly possible to obtain trademark protection for catchy and marketable phrases, assuming they are selected and used in a way as to indicate source.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Contact
more
less

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide