Another Court Finds the CFPB Constitutional

by Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Contact

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Ruling that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is constitutional and has the authority to act against companies without first adopting specific rules defining whether any specific practice is unfair, deceptive or abusive, a Pennsylvania federal court judge denied a student loan servicer’s motion to dismiss an enforcement action.

What happened

In January 2017, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) sued a major student loan servicer, alleging that the company created obstacles to repayment in a multitude of ways that amounted to unfair, abusive and deceptive practices in violation of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

Specifically, the Pennsylvania federal court complaint claimed that the servicer failed to follow the directions of borrowers with regard to repayments, repeatedly misapplied or misallocated payments, and continued to make the same errors again and again, even after borrowers complained.

In addition, the servicer allegedly guided borrowers into forbearance agreements in lieu of a new repayment plan to save itself time and paperwork, resulting in borrowers paying more than they needed to on their loans and the servicer earning $4 billion in interest on the loans of borrowers enrolled in multiple, consecutive forbearances.

The servicer also failed to adequately inform borrowers in income-driven repayment plans about their obligation to recertify their income and family size on an annual basis, causing borrowers to lose their lower monthly payments as a result, the CFPB said.

In response to the 11-count complaint, the servicer filed a motion to dismiss, contending that (i) the CFPB lacked the authority to bring suit without first engaging in rulemaking to declare specific acts or practices unfair, deceptive or abusive, the conduct alleged having never been the subject of such rulemaking; (ii) the structure of the CFPB is unconstitutional and therefore the director lacked authority to authorize the suit; and (iii) the various counts of the complaint failed to state a cause of action.

U.S. District Court Judge Robert D. Mariani, a 2011 appointee of President Obama, denied the defendant’s motion and rejected all of the defendant’s arguments.

The court first addressed the CFPB’s statutory authority to bring suit prior to engaging in rulemaking, looking to the statute itself, which states: “It shall be unlawful for … any covered person or service provider … to engage in any unfair, deceptive, or abusive act or practice.”

“Thus, there appears to be no reason why the CFPB cannot base an enforcement action on a violation of this provision of federal law,” the court said. The plain language of the statute “provides that the CFPB may, among other things, commence a civil action ‘to prevent a covered person or service provider from committing or engaging in an unfair, deceptive, or abusive act or practice under Federal law,’ and that one such violation of federal law occurs when a ‘covered person … engage[s] in any unfair, deceptive, or abusive act[s] or practice[s].’”

“The plain meaning of the statutory language provides that the CFPB has … the power to engage in rulemaking … and litigation … to address unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices,” Judge Mariani wrote. “The most harmonious construction of these provisions is that the CFPB may proceed either via rulemaking or an enforcement action. This interpretation is supported not only by the plain language of the provisions at issue, but finds support in other places as well.”

In response to the defendant’s argument that this logic is circular, the court pointed to “other places” being (i) the vague definitions of “unfair, deceptive, or abusive” conduct contained in the law itself (12 U.S.C. 5531(c)-(d)) (and which read like they are meant to curtail the scope of rulemaking, not enforcement), and (ii) the common law surrounding these terms. The court also pointed to a decision considering analogous language found in the Federal Trade Commission Act from the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit permitting the FTC to regulate companies’ data security practices via enforcement rather than rulemaking.

“[The servicer’s] argument mistakes the nature of this lawsuit,” the court said. “[T]he relevant legal question is not whether [the servicer] had fair notice of what acts or practices the CFPB has interpreted as unlawful under the Act, but only whether [the servicer] had fair notice of what the Act requires.”

Judge Mariani next determined that the structure of the CFPB passed constitutional scrutiny, citing decisions from federal courts in California (Obama appointee) and Indiana (Reagan appointee) for support, noting that a contrary opinion from the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit (PHH Corp.) is currently under en banc review.

The servicer argued that the combination of a single director who wields executive power, a director removable only for cause, and agency funding from outside the normal budgetary process rendered the CFPB unconstitutional. But the court disagreed.

The court found persuasive that (i) the CFPB’s powers closely parallel the Federal Trade Commission’s powers that have passed review by the Supreme Court; (ii) several other agencies operate completely outside the normal annual appropriations process (including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the National Credit Union Administration); and (iii) at least three other executive agencies—such as the Social Security Administration—are headed by a single individual. The court found unpersuasive the defendant’s argument that it was the unprecedented combination of these factors that renders the CFPB’s structure unconstitutional. Agreeing with the PHH court, however, Judge Mariani held that the only permissible remedy would be to render the CFPB director removable without cause, and a finding of unconstitutionality of structure would not have rendered nugatory the CFPB’s enforcement action.

Finally, Judge Mariani found that the CFPB sufficiently stated claims for which relief could be granted, given that the case remained in the pleading stage and many facts were not yet before the court.

To read the opinion, click here.

Why it matters

The Pennsylvania federal court decision marks the fifth time a court has weighed in on the constitutionality of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the fourth opinion upholding its structure. One interesting new point it contributes to the discussion is an observation that a director who cannot be removed except for cause is perhaps yet more accountable than officials on multidirector panels which have survived constitutional scrutiny. However, all eyes are trained on the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, for its ideologically divided en banc opinion.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Contact
more
less

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.