Another Successful First Amendment Challenge to the Prohibition of Off-Label Promotion for FDA-Approved Drugs

by Jackson Walker
Contact

The Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment prevailed in the latest challenge to the FDA's prohibition against marketing FDA-approved drugs for off-label (or non-FDA-approved) uses. Applying the Second Circuit’s precedent-setting decision in U.S. v. Caronia, 703 F.3d 149 (2d Cir. 2012), Judge Engelmayer of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted a preliminary injunction in favor of Amarin Pharma, Inc., and held that "[w]here the speech at issue consists of truthful and non-misleading speech promoting the off-label use of an FDA-approved drug, such speech… cannot be the act upon which an action for misbranding is based." Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. U.S. Food & Drug Admin., No. 1:15-cv-03588-PAE, *49 (S.D.N.Y. August 7, 2015) (emphasis in original).

A. The Amarin Decision

Amarin manufactures Vascepa, a drug derived from an omega-3 fatty acid obtained from fish oil. Vascepa is FDA-approved to treat patients with high levels (>500 mg/dL) of triglycerides. Amarin sought approval to publish information1 regarding Vascepa's off-label use for patients with lower levels (200-499 mg/dL) of triglycerides—a use for which physicians were already regularly prescribing Vascepa. In spite of the fact that the safety and efficacy of this off-label use was supported by FDA-approved studies, the FDA warned that Vascepa "may be considered to be misbranded" under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ("FDCA") if Amarin marketed it for off-label use.

Amarin preemptively filed suit against the FDA in order to prevent the FDA's prohibition against off-label promotion of Vascepa from chilling its constitutionally protected speech. Amarin argued that the FDA violated the First Amendment by prohibiting Amarin from making "completely truthful and non-misleading statements about its product to sophisticated healthcare professionals." Amarin, at *26 (quoting the Complaint filed by Amarin). The FDA responded with the argument that it could use speech as evidence of the intent (mens rea) and the act (actus rea) of misbranding. Id. at *44. It likened off-label advertising to activities such as jury tampering, insider trading, and blackmail in which speech alone, consistent with the First Amendment, is illegal. Id. at *45. The FDA further argued, among other things, that granting First Amendment protection to off-label promotion allows a manufacturer to sidestep the FDA drug approval process. Id. at *35, 49-50.

Relying heavily on, if not extending, the Second Circuit's Caronia decision, 2 the Court rejected the FDA’s arguments and ultimately held that Amarin can publish information regarding off-label use so long as it is "truthful and non-misleading." Id. at *71.3 As to the FDA's argument that off-label promotion is evidence both of the intent and the act of misbranding a drug, the court held that, as established in Caronia, the prohibition against dissemination of information about off-label use does, in fact, impermissibly prosecute the act of constitutionally protected speech. Id. at *46.4 Second, the court rejected the FDA's argument that permitting off-label promotion might eviscerate the FDA drug approval process. In this regard, the court followed Caronia's conclusion that the FDCA's ban on off-label advertising was not narrowly tailored to further the asserted government interest and, therefore, failed to satisfy the Supreme Court's commercial speech analysis in Central Hudson Gas & Elec. Corp. v. Public Service Comm'n of New York, 447 U.S. 557, 562-63 (1980). Based on these conclusions, the court ultimately decided that Amarin could engage in truthful and non-misleading speech promoting the off-label use of Vascepa. Amarin, at *69

B. Impact and Takeaways from Amarin

While the Amarin decision is another significant victory for pharmaceutical companies in the conflict between the First Amendment and the FDCA, its import (as well as Caronia's) is not as simple as "the First Amendment allows off-label advertising." First, neither Amarin nor Caronia give drug manufacturers carte blanche to publish any off-label information about their products. Certainly "snake oil salesman" pitches that are untrue or misleading or that may promote unsafe usage might still be prosecuted in misbranding actions. Second, both Amarin and Caronia concern communications with healthcare professionals, who have the discretion to prescribe drugs for off-label uses, as well as the training to appreciate the risks and benefits of off-label usage. Thus, we are unlikely to see direct-to-consumer advertising for particular off-label uses because—though the claims in the advertisements might be true—they might still be considered misleading to particular audiences.

The Amarin opinion includes ample warnings reiterating the importance of taking precautions to avoid the implication of the FDA's misbranding regulations even in light of protections that may be afforded by the First Amendment. Many of the precautionary measures involve pre-screening promotional materials with the FDA prior to circulation. The Court reccomended that drug manufactuerers:

  1. Consult with the FDA regarding any off-label uses and how promotional materials can properly promote such use. The FDA's Office of Prescription Drug Promotion can provide advisory commentary and practical guidance as to the content and scope of such communications.
  2. Ensure that the appropriate disclosures are included prior to dissemination of articles from scientific or medical journals related to unapproved uses of the FDA-approved drugs, and that such disclosures adequately address the FDA's concerns.
  3. Avoid false or misleading statements regarding off-label use on marketing materials; such statements may still be prosecuted as misbranding. Inadequate directions for intended uses may also be prosecuted as misbranding by the FDA.
  4. Closely monitor data concerning the safety and efficacy of off-label uses for particular drugs. Drug manufacturers are charged with ensuring that all statements regarding off-label use are truthful and non-misleading, and this status can change rapidly due to the dynamic nature of science and medicine. As Amarin warns, "A statement that is fair and balanced today may become incomplete or otherwise misleading in the future as new studies are done and new data is acquired." Id. at *66.

While the Amarin and Caronia decisions have provided First Amendment protections for pharmaceutical companies and their employees, it is crucial that all materials advertising off-label use for FDA-approved drugs be thoroughly scrutinized before publication and distribution.

1The information Amarin sought to publish included reprints of peer-reviewed scientific publications, summaries of clinical studies concerning the promoted off-label use, and various statements and disclosures about the promoted off-label use of Vascepa. Amarin, at *53-54.

2The Second Circuit's Caronia decision also addressed the conflict between the First Amendment and the FDA's prohibition on off-label advertising. In Caronia, a drug manufacturer's sales representative successfully appealed his conviction of conspiracy to introduce a misbranded drug into interstate commerce. Applying the principle of constitutional avoidance—since off-label promotion is not an explicit violation of the FDCA—the Second Circuit found that the FDCA could not be interpreted to prohibit truthful off-label promotion of a drug without violating the First Amendment. Id. at 162. The Caronia decision, in turn, held that "the government cannot prosecute pharmaceutical manufacturers and their representatives under the FDCA for speech promoting the lawful, off-label use of an FDA-approved drug." Id. at 169.

3Notably, the Amarin decision applies "across-the-board to all truthful and non-misleading promotional speech." Id. at *51 (referencing Caronia, at 149). Even before Amarin, drug manufacturers could disseminate off-label information in limited circumstances such as providing limited responses to unsolicited requests for off-label information on prescription drugs. Under the Amarin decision those limited exceptions seem to no longer be of consequence.

4The court recognized, however, that truthful speech might be evidence of the intent to commit misbranding where the act at issue is promotional activities other than truthful speech; e.g., payments to doctors as a reward for prescribing a drug for an off-label use. Id. at *52.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Jackson Walker | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Jackson Walker
Contact
more
less

Jackson Walker on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.