August 2016: Securities & Structured Finance Litigation Update: Relation Back in RMBS Putback Cases.

by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP

In a recent RMBS putback case in the Southern District of New York, Quinn Emanuel won a ruling that the plaintiff trustee’s expert reports, served nearly three years after the litigation commenced, satisfied the contractual requirement of loan-level breach notice and “related back” to the original complaint such that the statute of limitations did not bar any of the trustee’s claims. MASTR Adjustable Rate Mortgages Trust 2006-OA2 v. UBS Real Estate Securities (“MARM”), 2016 WL 1449751 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 12, 2016). This ruling almost doubled the number of loans at issue in the action under a notice theory, and thus substantially increased the potential recovery. If followed, this ruling should vitiate defendants’ attempts to bar putback claims relating to loans that were not the subject of pre-suit breach notices, as long as timely claims were brought as to some portion of the loans in the relevant trust.

The trustee sought recovery from the sponsor of three RMBS securitizations for the sponsor’s breaches of representations and warranties concerning the characteristics of securitized loans that it made in Pooling and Servicing Agreements (“PSAs”) governing the securitizations. The PSAs provided that the sponsor had to cure or repurchase materially defective loans within 90 days after receiving written notice of or discovering such breaches. The courts have held that no suit can be brought to enforce a repurchase obligation as to any loan until the cure or repurchase period for that loan has ended, and that, under the statute of limitations, any such suit must be commenced within six years of the closing of the securitization. See ACE Securities Corp. v. DB Structured Products, Inc., 25 N.Y.3d 581 (2015) (“ACE”). RMBS sponsors have repeatedly argued that, under ACE, no repurchase claims can be made with respect to any loans that were not specifically noticed prior to suit unless the defendant independently discovered the breaches, and that any attempt to notice claims after the commencement of suit is barred by the statute of limitations.

This argument was rejected in Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc., Series 2006-FM2 v. Nomura Credit & Capital, Inc., 133 A.D.3d 96 (1st Dep’t 2015) (“Nomura”). There, the First Department affirmed the lower court’s refusal to dismiss “claims relating to PRACTICE AREA NOTES (cont.) 8 loans that plaintiffs failed to mention in their breach notices or that were mentioned in breach notices sent less than 90 days before plaintiffs commenced their actions.” Id. at 108. The court distinguished ACE on the basis that no timely claims as to any loans were ever filed in ACE. By contrast, the plaintiffs in Nomura brought timely claims as to a portion of the loans at issue and any amendment to the complaint adding claims as to later-noticed loans would relate back to the timely claims and thus be timely. The court held that the allegations in the pre-suit letters put the defendant on notice that the plaintiffs may discover more defective loans. This, coupled with the complaint’s allegations that defendants discovered defective loans through their own due diligence, was sufficient to meet New York’s relation back standard.

In MARM, only 4,460 of the 17,082 loans in the trusts at issue were identified as materially defective in pre-suit breach notices. However, the trustee’s re-underwriting expert ultimately determined that 10,000 loans were materially defective. In August 2015, nearly three years after the complaint was filed, the trustee served its expert’s written report as to these 10,000 loans on UBS. UBS argued that because these loans were not identified in pre-suit breach notices, the trustee’s claims as to these loans based on a notice theory were untimely. The court disagreed, holding that the expert report provided written notice of all materially defective loans, and that because the trustee had brought timely claims as to at least some of these loans which had been the subject of pre-suit breach notices that warned that investigation of the loans was ongoing, under Nomura, the trustee’s claims as to later-noticed loans in the same trusts related back to these timely claims, and were themselves timely. MARM, 2016 WL 1449751, *4 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 12, 2016). The court further held that UBS suffered no prejudice from an amendment adding claims for these additional loans, because, contrary to UBS’s assertion, the complaint did allege that UBS independently discovered all materially defective loans, and thus “UBS was on notice that all loans were potentially in play.” Id. Quinn Emanuel’s successful application of Nomura more than doubled the number of loans for which the MARM trustee could pursue a notice-based theory, significantly easing its burden of proof.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.