BitMEX Faces Civil and Criminal Charges over Alleged CEA and AML Violations

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

BitMEX, a Seychelles-based centralized exchange for trading derivatives on bitcoin, ether and litecoin, and certain of its executives have been charged with a number of violations under the U.S. Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), including allegedly operating an unregistered trading platform and violating anti-money laundering regulations. The Department of Justice filed a parallel criminal indictment.

TAKEAWAYS

  • The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) charged the three BitMEX company founders and five affiliated legal entities with violating the Commodity Exchange Act, CFTC regulations, and anti-money laundering rules.
  • The Department of Justice (DOJ) commenced a parallel criminal enforcement against the three founders and a non-founder employee for “willfully failing” to implement adequate anti-money laundering policies and programs.
  • The CFTC and DOJ intend to closely monitor the digital asset market for compliance with U.S. regulations for financial institutions in the future.

On October 1, 2020, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filed a civil enforcement action against BitMEX, the second-largest cryptocurrency-derivatives exchange, and its three co-founders for operating an unregistered trading platform and failing to comply with anti-money laundering (AML) regulations. Simultaneously, DOJ criminally individually charged BitMEX’s owners and the head of business development with criminally conspiring to violate the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) by operating an exchange without complying with U.S. AML requirements, including the requirement to conduct KYC (know your customer) due diligence.

According to the U.S. charges, beginning in November 2014, BitMEX profited while illegally offering leveraged retail commodity transactions, futures, options and swaps on digital assets—including bitcoin, ether and litecoin—to persons in the United States without being registered with the CFTC as required by law. Specifically, BitMEX violated the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations by—

  • offering, entering into, confirming the execution of, or otherwise dealing in, off-exchange commodity futures transactions;
  • offering, entering into, confirming the execution of, or transacting in off-exchange transactions in commodity options;
  • acting as an unregistered futures commission merchant (FCM);
  • operating a facility for the trading or processing of swaps without being registered as a swap exchange facility (SEF) or as a designated contract market;
  • failing to supervise the handling of commodity interest accounts; and
  • failing to comply with applicable provisions of the Bank Secrecy Act.

The CFTC alleges that the defendants violated AML regulations by failing to implement any know-your-customer procedures, or a customer information program to verify the identity of its customers. BitMEX also allegedly failed to implement AML policies or procedures to prevent or detect terrorist financing and other criminal activity. The CFTC claims that the defendants were aware of U.S. regulations for financial institutions, but made conscious decisions to avoid and evade them despite serving U.S. customers.

On the same day as the filing of the CFTC complaint, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York initiated a criminal proceeding against BitMEX’s founders, as well as its head of business development, charging the four individuals with violating the Bank Secrecy Act and conspiracy to violate the Bank Secrecy Act. The Department of Justice alleges that the defendants “willfully fail[ed] to establish, implement, and maintain” adequate AML program and policies. The charges state that BitMEX permitted customers to conduct financial transactions anonymously, thereby causing BitMEX to be used to launder the proceeds of crimes and permitting trading by customers located in sanctioned countries. Indeed, the complaint alleges that two founders personally communicated with customers from Iran.

These actions signal that the CFTC and the Department of Justice will be closely monitoring the digital asset market for any activities that undermine the market’s integrity. They also make clear the risk to international financial intermediaries that do business with U.S. persons. Acting Manhattan U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss said: “With the opportunities and advantages of operating a financial institution in the United States comes the obligation for those businesses to do their part to help in driving out crime and corruption. As alleged, these defendants flouted that obligation and undertook to operate a purportedly ‘off-shore’ crypto exchange while willfully failing to implement and maintain even basic anti-money laundering policies.”

Also at issue in these enforcement actions is the adequacy of “geo-blocking” mechanisms often employed by offshore crypto exchanges. According to the CFTC complaint and the indictment, BitMEX’s sole geo-blocking method was an IP address check and BitMEX did nothing to prevent U.S. persons from circumventing this geo-block. Allegedly, the use by BitMEX’s U.S. customers of VPN services to mask the customer’s IP address, making online actions virtually untraceable, was an “open secret” and the defendants are accused of knowing that U.S. customers opened and were continuing to use BitMEX accounts.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Contact
more
less

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.