US V. Lawrence DiCristina


by Ian Imrich

SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT in Poker Player's Alliance (PPA) Amicus Curiae Brief:

Poker is an American tradition and a game of skill. Invented in the United States approximately two centuries ago, the game has always been popular. Tens of millions of Americans from all walks of life—including presidents, legislators, jurists, scientists, investors, police officers, physicians, performers, and teachers, to name just a few—regularly play poker.

Poker’s popularity is attributable, in significant part, to the fact that it has low barriers to entry, but is an incredibly rich game—indeed, leading academics have posited that poker’s complexity exceeds that of chess. Poker also taps into our competitive instincts, appealing to the same part of our collective psyche that loves sports. Moreover, poker is a social activity. It brings strangers together and cements bonds among friends; it bridges cultural, political, and socioeconomic gaps; and it provides tremendous entertainment and enrichment to the millions of Americans who play.

Poker’s popularity also stems from the fact that it is a game of skill. Millions of American poker players recognize what the evidence in this case established: that players succeed or fail based on how well they exercise a diverse array of skills. Unlike gambling, where stilted odds and systemic information asymmetries ensure that the players lose and the house wins, poker players have an opportunity, in every single hand, to outplay their opponents in a fair contest of skill.

When Congress enacted the IGBA, it did not target poker. The statute applies only to “gambling businesses,” and its definition of “gambling” does not mention poker games. A close reading of the definition reveals that it is confined to games of chance that do not share poker’s core traits. The IGBA thus includes three categories of activities: (1) organized sports betting, including bookmaking and pool-selling; (2) “pit” games, i.e., slot machines, roulette, and dice games in which the players play against the house; and (3) lotteries, including policy, bolita, and numbers. Each category falls cleanly within the traditional definition of “gambling”: playing games of chance for money. Each category generated substantial revenues for organized crime. And most importantly, for at least two reasons, each category excludes poker.

First, while the gambling activities in the IGBA are games of chance, poker is a contest of skill. As the evidence shows—and as the Government vigorously disputed below but now concedes, Gov’t Br. 14—skill predominates over chance in poker. Crucially, because poker is a peer-to-peer game, even an average poker player can win consistently. That is because a poker player competes only against the other players at his table, and it is the relative skill of these players that determines their results. This fact distinguishes poker from all of the games identified in the IGBA. It distinguishes poker from roulette, where the player competes against the house and the odds are rigged in the house’s favor. It also distinguishes poker from the types of organized sports betting (bookmaking and pool-selling) identified in the IGBA. Every sports bettor who hopes to consistently make money with a bookmaker must make better predictions than a professional oddsmaker—a feat that the typical better can accomplish only by luck, and therefore not consistently. But in poker, the players compete in a fair contest—typically, as in games like Appellee’s—against opponents of comparable skill.

Second, none of the gambling activities identified in the IGBA share poker’s distinct place in American history and culture. That matters because Congress would not have targeted poker without even mentioning it. Moreover, Congress was not interested in every activity that might conceivably be regarded as gambling, but only those activities that provided significant revenues to organized crime. The Government concedes that poker was not such a game. And indeed, poker was and is incapable of being such a game. Poker operators generate revenues through the “rake,” a small fee collected from each pot as compensation for hosting the game. Compared to pit games, where the house takes a losing player’s entire wager, poker rakes generate miniscule revenues. Similarly, organized sports betting and lotteries can generate massive sums by instantaneously collecting wagers from thousands of players without any physical footprint—they are perfect cash cows for organized crime, in a way that poker, which requires that players be physically present for extended periods of time, could not be.

When viewed in light of these distinctions, any superficial similarities between poker and gambling are insufficient to make hosting a poker game a federal felony under the IGBA. The legality of poker is instead a question of state law, and as the Government itself explains, states are actively regulating the game.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info: Legal Memoranda: Motion Addressed to Pleadings | Federal, 2nd Circuit, New York | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ian Imrich, Law Offices of Ian J. Imrich, APC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Ian Imrich

Law Offices of Ian J. Imrich, APC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.