Business Owner Ordered to Pay $1.3 Million for Leaking UST

by Snell & Wilmer

The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) obtained a judgment against William Arnett for $1.3 million for underground storage tank (UST) law violations that stem back to the late 1980s. A Maricopa County Superior Court held that Arnett, the owner of property in Tucson that contained a UST, was liable to ADEQ for remediation costs associated with cleaning up the property, a civil penalty for his failure to comply with UST laws, and ADEQ’s litigation costs associated with bringing the enforcement action. State of Ariz. v. Arnett, No. CV2010-027249 (Sup. Ct., Maricopa County, orders issued on Apr. 24, 2013, Oct. 14, 2015, Dec. 18, 2015).

ADEQ issued a press release following the judgment in favor of ADEQ and touted the case as being significant because:

  • It is the first leaking UST case to result in a judicial judgment since the state’s UST laws were overhauled in 1997;
  • It establishes that defendants in civil actions brought by ADEQ for violations of state environmental laws are not entitled to a trial by jury; and
  • It establishes that defendants cannot misrepresent the true owner of a use to block ADEQ from seeking sanctions against that owner at a later date.

While this case could be viewed as indicative of a new approach or a change in the UST laws, the case is very fact intensive so the precedential impact of this case remains uncertain.


Arnett and his wife owned a piece of property in Tucson, which happened to have a UST.  Arnett leased the property to Yellow Cab Company of Tucson (“Yellow Cab”), which was wholly owned by Arnett and his wife.  Despite a series of test failures on the UST in the late 1980s, Arnett failed to report these to ADEQ.  Finally, in 1990, Arnett reported a failed tank tightness test to ADEQ and identified Yellow Cab as the “Responsible Party.”  The UST was removed from the property shortly thereafter, and in May 1993, ADEQ and Yellow Cab entered into a Consent Order for remediation of the property.  Following a lawsuit filed by ADEQ against Yellow Cab alleging violations of the Consent Order, ADEQ and Yellow Cab resolved the lawsuit by a Consent Decree in July 1995.  Despite signing the Consent Decree as President of Yellow Cab, Arnett was not a named party.

Yellow Cab filed for bankruptcy in 2003 and was administratively dissolved in 2004.  Around this time, ADEQ became aware that Arnett, and not Yellow Cab, might own the property and UST.  In 2010, ADEQ filed an action against Arnett, personally, for liability associated with violations of UST laws.  Arnett claimed that the 2010 action by ADEQ was barred by res judicata (claim preclusion).

Trial Court’s Holding and Court of Appeals Affirmation

The trial court held that because Arnett was a privy of Yellow Cab, the doctrine of res judicata would bar ADEQ from bringing the subsequent action asserting the same claim against Arnett as it had previously brought against Yellow Cab, unless an exception applied.  One such exception involves a defendant’s own misrepresentation that prevented the plaintiff from suing him in the first place.  The court held that Arnett misrepresented Yellow Cab as the owner of the UST, that ADEQ relied on this misrepresentation in bringing suit against Yellow Cab and that ADEQ’s reliance was reasonable. Arnett argued that ADEQ’s reliance was not reasonable because it could have discovered the ownership information in the public record.  The court, however, rejected this argument on the grounds that the statute Arnett cited did not apply outside the real estate transaction context, and that the court, as the finder of fact, determined that ADEQ’s reliance was reasonable and consistent with Title 49’s self-reporting scheme. Therefore, the court held that this exception applied and denied Arnett’s claim that the lawsuit was barred by res judicata.  The Court of Appeals affirmed this decision.

The Court of Appeals also affirmed the trial court’s denial of a right to a jury trial.  The right to a jury trial is only available if that right existed prior to statehood or if a statute expressly provides so.   Here, these statutory claims did not exist prior to statehood and they do not provide for a right to a jury trial.  Therefore, there is no right to a jury trial for violations of UST laws.

Remediation Costs, Penalties and Litigation Costs Assessed Against Arnett

Following the Court of Appeals’ affirmation on the issue of liability, the trial court addressed the issue of the amount Arnett’s liability.  The trial court found that Arnett would be liable for the following costs, which total just over $1.3 million:

  • Remediation costs: $534,440
  • Penalties: $595,642
  • Litigation costs: $204,007


While this case serves as a warning to UST owners regarding the importance of self-reporting and ADEQ’s ability to judicially-enforce violations of UST laws, any precedential impact beyond this is uncertain.  ADEQ’s press release indicates that it may use this case as precedent to claim that defendants in civil actions brought by ADEQ for violations of state environmental laws (not just UST laws) are not entitled to a jury trial.  Also, ADEQ may try to utilize the exception to the application of the res judicata doctrine regarding misrepresentation outside the UST context as well.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Snell & Wilmer | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Snell & Wilmer

Snell & Wilmer on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.