California Employers Will Need to Change How They Calculate Meal and Rest Period Premiums Following California Supreme Court Decision

Epstein Becker & Green
Contact

Epstein Becker & Green

California law generally requires employers to pay non-exempt employees a premium of one hour of pay for non-compliant meal and rest periods. Employers have typically paid such premiums by using the employees’ standard hourly rates. A new California Supreme Court decision requires employers to pay premiums at a higher rate when employees receive nondiscretionary compensation. This change in the law not only will require employers to adjust how they calculate meal and rest period premiums going forward, but it also exposes some of them to litigation for their past practices if they did not previously pay at the higher rates – despite the fact that, before this new decision, they had no reason to believe that premiums should be paid at those higher rates.

On July 15, 2021, in Ferra v. Loews Hollywood Hotel, LLC, the California Supreme Court held that, when an employer is obligated to pay a meal or rest period premium for failing to provide a compliant meal or rest period, that premium must be paid at the “regular rate of pay,” as that term of art is generally used for overtime purposes, rather than the employee’s base rate of pay. The “regular rate of pay” generally takes into account all nondiscretionary forms of wages, including hourly pay, shift differentials, piece-rate, commissions and incentive/production bonuses, among other forms.

In reliance on a number of federal decisions, many employers in California have understandably paid these meal or rest period premiums based on employees’ base rates of pay. The California Supreme Court has now made clear that such a practice does not comply with the Labor Code.

Equally significant, the Ferra decision appears to apply retroactively, meaning that many California employers are likely to face a new wave of class actions and Private Attorneys General Act lawsuits alleging that their past practices did not comply with the Ferra standard.

For employers that do not provide any form of compensation beyond an employee’s hourly wages, the Ferra decision should not affect their operations.  In those circumstances, the “regular rate of pay” would always be equal to the base rate of pay.

Following Ferra, however, entities doing business in California that provide some form of compensation beyond hourly wages will want to review their payroll practices and make necessary adjustments to ensure that that meal and rest period premiums are calculated at the correct amounts.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Epstein Becker & Green | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Epstein Becker & Green
Contact
more
less

Epstein Becker & Green on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.