CARES Act Provider Relief Fund: Connecting HHS's Dots On Whether Your Tranche #1 Payment Is An Overpayment

Husch Blackwell LLP
Contact

After the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) automatically distributed $30 billion to providers as Tranche #1 Relief Fund payments based on 2019 Medicare fee-for-service payment data, HHS subsequently released a new formula that was based on 2018 “program service revenue” and intended to calculate providers’ payments under Relief Fund Tranches #1 and #2 cumulatively. For providers whose Tranche #1 payments alone exceeded their expected payment under the new “program service revenue” formula, there have been ongoing questions about whether such providers were “overpaid” and needed to reject and return their Tranche #1 payments.

While guidance in this area has evolved frequently,[1] there is support that HHS does not consider a Tranche #1 payment that merely exceeds a provider’s expected payment under HHS’s “program service revenue” formula to be an overpayment. The below chart contains examples of HHS guidance and actions that lend support to this position. It is important to note that payments that were received in error or that exceed a provider’s qualifying expenses and losses will need to be returned.[2] While HHS says that unused payment amounts should be returned “at the conclusion of the pandemic,”[3] HHS has not otherwise defined the end date for qualifying expenses and losses or the process for returning unused payment amounts.

HHS Removed “Do Not
Attest” Language

HHS removed language from the Provider Relief Fund payment attestation portal that had instructed providers not to attest if their Tranche #1 payment exceeded their expected payment under the “program service revenue” formula.

HHS Characterizes the “Program Service Revenue” Formula As Calculating a Provider’s Minimum Payment Amount

  • HHS updated its communications to providers and its Relief Fund FAQs[4] to characterize the “program service revenue” formula as calculating the minimum amount of payment a provider can expect to receive under Tranches #1 and #2 cumulatively, as opposed to a maximum amount or “cap.”
  • In its Relief Fund FAQs, HHS says that “[p]roviders do not need to be able to prove, at the time they accept a Provider Relief Fund payment, that prior and/or future lost revenues and increased expenses attributable to COVID-19 (excluding those covered by other sources of reimbursement) meet or exceed their Provider Relief Fund payment.”[5]

HHS Appears to Be Focusing Future Enforcement on Proper Use of
Relief Payments

In its Relief Fund FAQs, HHS says:

  • “Generally, HHS does not intend to recoup
    funds as long as a provider’s lost revenue
    and increased expenses exceed the amount
    of provider relief funding a provider has received.”[6]
  • “HHS expects that providers will only use Provider Relief Fund payments for permissible purposes and if, at the conclusion of the pandemic, providers have leftover Provider Relief Fund money that they cannot expend on permissible expenses or losses, then they will return this money to HHS. HHS will provide directions in the future about how to return unused funds.”[7]
  • “Retention and use of these funds are subject to certain terms and conditions. If these terms and conditions are met, payments do not need to be repaid at a later date.”[8] The referenced terms and conditions do not require rejection of Tranche #1 payments based on application of the “program service revenue” formula.

[1] Note that HHS has updated its Relief Fund FAQs repeatedly, sometimes on a near-daily basis. This article is based on the version of the FAQs that appeared on HHS’s website as of June 9, 2020. It is likely that HHS will continue to update its FAQs subsequent to the publication of this article.

Back to the top

[2] “HHS reserves the right to audit Relief Fund recipients in the future to . . . collect any Relief Fund amounts that were made in error or exceed lost revenue or increased expenses due to COVID-19.” See HHS, Relief Fund FAQs at 10 (last accessed June 9, 2020). Note that HHS has not further defined what receiving a relief payment “in error” means.

[3] See HHS, Relief Fund FAQs at 6 (last accessed June 9, 2020).

[4] “HHS is distributing an additional $20 billion of the General Distribution to providers to augment their initial allocation so that $50 billion is allocated proportional to providers’ share of 2018 gross receipts or sales/program service revenue. The allocation methodology is designed to provide relief to providers, who bill Medicare fee-for-service, with at least 2% of that provider’s gross receipts regardless of the provider’s payer mix” (emphasis added). See HHS, Relief Fund FAQs at 10 (last accessed June 9, 2020).

Back to the top

[5] See HHS, Relief Fund FAQs at 6 (last accessed June 9, 2020).

[6] See HHS, Relief Fund FAQs at 10 (last accessed June 9, 2020).

[7] See HHS, Relief Fund FAQs at 6 (last accessed June 9, 2020). See also HHS, Relief Fund FAQs at 5 (last accessed June 9, 2020) (“HHS has not yet detailed how recoupment or repayment will work.”).

[8] See HHS, Relief Fund FAQs at 2 (last accessed June 9, 2020).

Written by:

Husch Blackwell LLP
Contact
more
less

Husch Blackwell LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.