CFPB Facilitates CARES Act Payments to Individuals

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact

Morrison & Foerster LLP

On April 13, 2020, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued an interpretive rule to provide guidance to government agencies, including the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”), to make COVID-19-related relief payments to individuals, including the payments authorized in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act).  Among other things, the CARES Act, Pub. L. No. 116-136, provides for one-time direct payments to individuals, so-called “recovery rebates” or economic impact payments (EIPs), of up to $1,200 per adult and $500 per child, subject to certain income thresholds and eligibility restrictions.

According to a press release, the CFPB is loosening its existing rules to make it easier to provide EIPs and other government pandemic-relief payments via prepaid account to individuals without access to direct deposit.  Currently, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA) and its implementing Regulation E prohibit government agencies from requiring a consumer to establish an account with a financial institution to receive electronic fund transfers in order to collect a government benefit (the “compulsory use prohibition”).

The interpretive rule provides that, under particular circumstances, certain pandemic-relief payments will not be considered government benefits for purposes of Regulation E, and, thus, the payments will not be subject to the compulsory use prohibition.  Specifically, under the interpretive rule, the term “government benefit” in Regulation E § 1005.10(e)(2) will exclude payments from federal, state, or local governments if the payments are made:  (1) to provide assistance to consumers in response to the COVID-19 pandemic or its economic impacts; (2) apart from an already-established government benefit program; (3) on a one-time or limited basis; and (4) with no requirement that consumers apply to the agency to receive funds.

The CFPB also notes in its interpretive rule that Regulation E excludes from the definition of “prepaid account,” and, therefore, coverage under Regulation E, an account that is directly or indirectly established through a third party and loaded only with qualified disaster-relief payments.

The interpretive rule will be effective as of the date it is published in the Federal Register, which is anticipated shortly.  To date, Treasury has not made any official statements regarding operationalizing this flexibility provided by the CFPB.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact
more
less

Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide