CFTC seeks public input on risks of direct clearing for retail derivatives clearing organizations

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

On December 18, the CFTC announced it had issued a request for comment to inform its understanding of the risks and regulatory issues related to derivatives clearing organizations (DCOs) that offer direct clearing services to retail traders, referred to as retail DCOs. The CFTC highlighted a “rapid[]” increase in direct clearing for retail participants, especially in fully collateralized event-based markets, where traditional intermediaries such as futures commission merchants (FCMs) are not involved. The CFTC contended this shift raises important questions about the allocation of key responsibilities — including know-your-customer and anti-money laundering compliance, customer fund protections, and default management — which are typically performed by FCMs in intermediated clearing models.

The CFTC requested input on whether retail DCOs should be required to fulfill all duties usually performed by intermediaries, whether they should be required to have affiliated intermediaries, and what additional regulations may be necessary to address conflicts of interest and risk management. The agency also questioned whether hybrid models that combine direct and intermediated clearing should be permitted and, if so, what protections are needed to prevent “unexpected or undue ‘risk transfer’” between participant groups. Additionally, the CFTC requested comments on whether to establish a separate DCO registration sub-category specifically for retail DCOs with tailored requirements for retail protection and risk management.  The CFTC’s announcement noted comments will be accepted until January 19, while the request for comment provides a February 2 deadline for receipt of comments.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Written by:

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact
more
less

What do you want from legal thought leadership?

Please take our short survey – your perspective helps to shape how firms create relevant, useful content that addresses your needs:

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide