Checklist for Strengthening Your Defenses to 401k Plan Class Actions

by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

The last ten years have seen a proliferation of high-profile class actions alleging breach of ERISA fiduciary duties of prudence and loyalty against plan fiduciaries.  The claims are usually based upon alleged excessive investment management fees, excessive plan recordkeeping and other administrative expenses, and poor performance of investment options selected by and retained in the plan's investment menu by the plan's fiduciaries.  Many of these cases also include claims based on alleged prohibited transactions between a plan and its fiduciaries or parties in interest under ERISA section 406.

Application of the governing legal standards (adapted from the law of trusts) to these claims – performance of fiduciary duties solely in the interest of the plan's participants and beneficiaries and with the care and diligence "under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent man acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with like aims (29 U.S.C. § 1104(a) – is flexible, imprecise and fact-intensive.

These cases usually settle after protracted and expensive litigation, with substantial awards of attorneys' fees to plaintiffs' counsel.  "Plaintiffs Ramp Up 401(k) Lawsuits."  The Wall Street Journal, July 14, 2017.  For example, surviving aspects of both the Tibble and Tussey cases, referenced below, are still being litigated after ten years of motion and appellate practice.  Accordingly, it is in the interest of plan sponsors and plan fiduciaries to take all reasonable steps to head off claims quickly if they are asserted.  The following checklist is offered as a non-exclusive guide for those purposes. 

  • Strengthen Defenses to a Class Action
    • Have legal counsel evaluate the complaint in light of the prevailing case law in your jurisdiction. The following is a summary of seminal cases:                     
      • Tibble v. Edison International, 135 S. Ct. 1823 (2015).
      • The only Supreme Court case in the area held that plan sponsors have a continuing duty to review investments in 401(k) plans, even if the investment was initially selected outside ERISA's six-year statute of limitations period for fiduciary claims.
      • Tatum v. RJR Pension Inv. Comm., 761 F.3d 346 (4th Cir. 2014).
        • The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's holding that an employer breached its fiduciary duty under ERISA when it liquidated two employer stock funds held by a 401(k) plan, which resulted in substantial loss to the participants, without conducting a thorough investigation.
      • Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer, 134 S. Ct. 2459 (2014)
        • "Because the content of the duty of prudence turns on 'the circumstances prevailing at the time the fiduciary acts [under 29 U.S.C. §1104(a(1)(B)] the appropriate inquiry will necessarily be content specific." 
      • Pension Benefit Guar. Corp. ex rel. St. Vincent v. Morgan Stanley Inv. Mgmt. (St. Vincent"), 712 F.3d 705, 716 (2d Cir. 2012)

        • A fiduciary's actions are judged based upon information available to the fiduciary at the time of each investment decision and not from the vantage point of hindsight.  A court is required "to consider the extent to which plan fiduciaries at a given point in time reasonably could have predicted the outcome that followed."
      • Tussey v. ABB, Inc., 746 F.3d 327 (8th Cir. 2014).

        • The court found that the fiduciaries breached their duty of loyalty and prudence by failing to:
          • Adequately monitor recordkeeping costs;
          • Determine whether the record keeping costs were competitive; and
          • Adequately leverage the plan's size to reduce fees 
      • Significant facts were that plan fiduciaries were allowing revenue sharing as a kickback for including the record keeper's proprietary funds as plan investment options, had allowed the plan to subsidize non-plan operations of the plan sponsor and record keeper, and had disregarded a consultant's warning that the plan expenses were excessive.
    • Alert the fiduciary insurance carrier to get defense coverage in place.
    • Hire a damage expert to evaluate potential exposure from both plaintiffs' and defendants' best case perspective and help craft a settlement offer.
    • Be attentive to safeguarding the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine protection in discovery and if the case goes to trial.  Consider obtaining advice and analysis from consultant(s) who will not be a testifying as expert witnesses on summary judgment or at trial.  Keep written consultant reports to the necessary minimum.
    • Hire a law firm with a good track record in winning ERISA fiduciary duty class actions or obtaining reasonable early settlements.
    • Early stage litigation strategy.
      • Attempt to knock out the case on a motion to dismiss, (as successfully done by Chevron in the recent case of White v. Chevron Corp., No. 16-cv-0793-PJH, 2016 U.S. Distr. LEXIS 115875 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2016).  In the Chevron case, the District Court ruled that a fiduciary's decision should not be reviewed with hindsight but in light of the circumstances when the decision was made. The Court also said that while investment fees are important, they are only one factor to consider when selecting investments.
      • Likewise, in Meiners v. Wells Fargo & Co., No. 0:16-cv-03981-DSD-FLN (D. Minn. May 25, 2017), the court granted a motion to dismiss with prejudice against claims that Wells Fargo's Target Date Funds underperformed comparable Vanguard funds and were more expensive than comparable Vanguard and Fidelity funds. The court held that comparison of performance for different funds was insufficient to imply that the plan's decision making process was flawed, when the comparator funds had a different investment strategy. The mere fact that the plan's funds were more expensive than other funds did not support a breach of fiduciary duty absent facts that the claimed cheaper comparators were reliable, of similar size and offered similar services. In order to show that the fiduciary breached its duties by promoting its own proprietary funds, the court held that the plaintiff must provide additional facts showing that the fiduciary's decision was based on financial interest rather than a legitimate consideration. The Meiners dismissal has been appealed to the Eighth Circuit.
      • By stipulated agreement or, if necessary, motion, obtain a protective order to safeguard confidential information against improper use and disclosure of confidential information and a Federal Rules of Evidence 502(d) order to preserve rights to protect against inadvertent disclosure of confidential electronically stored information.
      • Take advantage of circuit law to the extent available to invoke the three-year statute of limitations of 29 U.S.C. § 1113(2) by demonstrating that the named plaintiffs had timely "actual knowledge" of facts necessary to support their claims.  See, e.g., In re Northrup Grumman Corp. ERISA Litig., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176822, **74-100 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2015) ("Under the standard adopted by the Ninth Circuit, the 'statute of limitations is triggered by knowledge of the transaction that constituted the alleged violation, not by plaintiffs' knowledge of the law, "citing Blanton v. Anzalone, 760 F.2d 989, 992 (9th Cir. 1985).  Also see Sulyma v. Intel Corp. Inv. Policy Comm., No. 15-cv-04977-NC, 2017WL 1217185 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2017) where the Court ruled that the plaintiffs' claims were time barred under ERISA's three year statute of limitations because Intel sent financial disclosures which conferred "actual knowledge" of the transaction (not necessarily knowledge of the law) more than three years prior to the lawsuit.  The Sulyma case is on appeal to the Ninth Circuit.
      • See also Brotherston v. Putnam Investments, LLC., No. 1:15-cv-13825-WGY (D. Mass. March 30, 2017), where the court, similarly to Sulyma, granted summary judgment for Putnam on certain claims based on the "actual knowledge" standard..  (On June 19, 2017, after the plaintiffs rested, the court entered judgment for Putnam on the remaining claims in Brotherston because the plaintiffs failed to prove loss causation necessary to support damages for breach of fiduciary duty). Brotherston has been appealed to the First Circuit. 
      • Narrow the class with standing arguments (Fuller v. Sun Trust Banks, Inc., 2012 WL 1432306 (N.D. Ga. Mar. 20, 2012) (named plaintiff lacked standing to raise her claims with respect to a fund in which she did not invest) and the time period with statute of limitations arguments (In re Northrop Grumman Corp. ERISA Litig., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176822 (C.D.Cal. Nov. 24, 2015)).
      • If possible, try to settle cases before disposition of motions.  Such a strategy will usually require class discovery, certification of a class for settlement purposes, notice to putative class members, a fairness hearing by the court, and a consent t order approving the class settlement and barring further litigation of class claims by class members.
    • Summary judgment strategies,/class action strategies
      • Develop arguments under FRCP Rule 23 to limit class scope and require division into subclasses as appropriate.
      •  Ensure that notice(s) to putative class members are accurate, informative and unbiased.
      •  Prepare for fairness hearing and any opt-out attempts by putative class members.
      • Identify, engage and prepare an expert on plan expense and investment performance who will support the defense by testimony for summary judgment or at trial.
      • Consider Daubert motion(s) challenging qualifications of Plaintiff's expert(s).
      • Preparation of pre-trial order and trial memorandum outlining the defense factual presentation and analyzing and arguing the applicable law.  
      • Identification and preparation of trial exhibits.
      •  Consider of motions for judgment as a matter of law at the appropriate trial points.
  • Conclusion
  • The foregoing checklist will help your company and the plan fiduciaries minimize class action exposure if one is filed.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.