CJEU Reaffirms Independence of EU and Member States Leniency Programs

by K&L Gates LLP

The Court of Justice of the EU (“CJEU”) recently issued a seminal preliminary ruling on the relationship between EU leniency programs and the leniency programs of Member States. The CJEU reaffirms that EU and Member State leniency programs function independently. This means that entities which obtain leniency or immunity in an EU cartel investigation are not entitled to leniency/immunity in related national investigations (the “Judgment”).

The Judgment further reinforces the need for companies to exercise great care in preparing leniency applications to the European Commission (the “Commission”) and national competition authorities. It also highlights the material risks created by minor inconsistencies between the leniency applications.

The Judgment is likely to be given significant weight by the Commission in connection with the ongoing public consultation aimed at empowering the national competition authorities to be more effective enforcers [1] and could result in legislative action at the EU level.

The Judgment originated from a request by Italy’s Council of State for a preliminary ruling. The national proceedings involved the Italian Competition Authority (the “ICA”)’s decision to impose fines on a freight forwarding company for participating in a cartel forwarding road freight, to and from Italy.

On 5 June 2007, the freight-forwarding company submitted an application for leniency with the Commission and obtained conditional immunity for the entire international forwarding sector (which included maritime, air and road transit). However, the Commission ultimately decided to pursue only the part of the cartel concerning international air freight forwarding services leaving the ICA free to pursue infringements in relation to sea and road freight forwarding services.

On 12 July 2007, this freight-forwarding company submitted to the ICA a summary application for immunity. The national leniency application did not specifically cover the road transport sector. Subsequently, on 23 June 2008, this company submitted an additional summary application for immunity covering the road transport sector. However, in the meantime, another freight forwarding company had submitted leniency applications to the Commission and a summary application to the ICA covering road freight-forwarding in Italy.

As a result, the ICA recognized this second freight forwarding company as the first company to have applied for immunity in Italy for road freight forwarding since the other freight-forwarding company had requested immunity from fines only for air and sea freight-forwarding.

The ICA decision was challenged before the administrative tribunal of Lazio on the grounds that the ICA should have granted immunity in Italy to the first freight forwarding company for all three freight-forwarding sectors, including road transport, and that the ICA was required to assess its summary application for immunity in Italy in light of the application for immunity filed at the EU level. The tribunal’s ruling upholding the ICA’s decision was appealed to Italy’s Council of State which sought the CJEU’s preliminary ruling on a number of issues stemming from the interplay between EU and Member State leniency programs.

The impact of the Judgment
In the Judgment, the CJEU held that the European Competition Network (“ECN”) [2] does not have the power to adopt legally binding rules. As a result, the treatment of leniency applications sent to a national competition authority is determined by that authority under its national law.

According to the CJEU, national competition authorities are free to adopt leniency programs and each of those programs is autonomous as regards both other Member State’s programs and the EU leniency program.

As a consequence, no provision of EU cartel law requires national competition authorities to interpret a summary application in the light of an application for immunity submitted to the Commission, irrespective of whether or not that summary application accurately reflects the content of the application submitted to the Commission.

Moreover, in case of a discrepancy between the EU leniency application and the summary application, there is no obligation for the national competition authority to contact the Commission or the applicant.

Finally, as far as the ECN Model Leniency Program is concerned, Member States are not precluded from adopting rules not provided in such model program or which diverge from it, so long as that competence is exercised in compliance with EU law. However, Member States may not render the implementation of EU competition law impossible or excessively difficult and must ensure that the national rules which they establish or apply do not jeopardise the effective application of Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of European Union. 

Implications for companies
Although the Judgment does not create new law, it does reaffirm the independence of the EU and national leniency regimes.

The Judgment also reaffirms that, in the event of inconsistencies (even if apparently modest), an applicant cannot rely on a broader scope in its EU leniency application to protect itself from fines by national competition authorities.

As a result, applicants must take great care to ensure that they file leniency applications in all relevant jurisdictions and that these applications are consistent as regards the scope of conduct covered. Applicants must file summary applications in all potentially relevant EU jurisdictions and provide sufficient information to the national competition authorities to keep those summary applications updated so as to ensure that they are covered in the event that the Commission decides to limit its investigation to only certain aspects of a cartel, leaving the national competition authorities free to pursue other aspects of the cartel at the national level.

The pitfalls created by the current system of parallel competences introduced by Regulation 1/2003, and the absence of a centralized EU leniency program, has long been recognized. However, these issues are likely to be carefully considered by the Commission in the context of its ongoing public consultation and may fall within legislative proposal reforms to address these shortcomings in the near future.



[1] It is available at http://ec.europa.eu/competition/consultations/2015_effective_enforcers/index_en.html.

[2] The ECN comprises the Commission and the national competition authorities with the objective of ensuring the effective and consistent application of competition rules and the development of best practices, including the adoption of the ECN Model Leniency Program.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© K&L Gates LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

K&L Gates LLP

K&L Gates LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.