Class Action Decisions Published November 2025

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.
Contact

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

Highlights from this issue include:

  • Class Action Fairness Act Jurisdiction. The Ninth Circuit held that a plaintiff’s decision to remove class allegations after a case is removed from state court to federal court deprives the federal court of jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act.
  • Ascertainability. The Tenth Circuit held that for a class to be ascertainable, the class definition must (1) be defined clearly and cannot be defined too vaguely and (2) be defined objectively and cannot be based on subjective criteria. The Tenth Circuit refused to impose a separate “administrative feasibility” requirement.
  • American Pipe Tolling. The Fifth Circuit held the Texas Supreme Court would likely not toll the statute of limitations for a state law claim during a pending federal class action.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

Written by:

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA

  • Increased readership
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing writing guidance

Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra

Start Publishing »

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide