Colorado Asks the Supreme Court to Overturn Quill

by Alston & Bird

On August 29, the Direct Marketing Association (DMA) submitted a certiorari petition to the U.S. Supreme Court asking the Court to review the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Direct Marketing Association v. Brohl (Brohl II). The case already made one trip to the Supreme Court (Brohl I), in which the Court held that the Tax Injunction Act did not bar federal-court review of the case. On remand, the Tenth Circuit held that Colorado’s use tax reporting regime did not violate the Commerce Clause.

(To refresh: Colorado’s regime requires out-of-state sellers to report sales to Colorado customers to the customers themselves and to the Colorado Department of Revenue. We’ve discussed use tax reporting laws like this one in a previous post.)

In its certiorari petition for Brohl II, DMA asked the Supreme Court to consider three questions, all of which center on whether the Tenth Circuit correctly decided that Colorado’s use tax law does not discriminate against interstate commerce. In a somewhat surprising turn of events, however, Colorado didn’t simply file a brief opposing DMA’s petition. Instead, on October 3, Colorado filed its own “Conditional Cross-Petition for Writ of Certiorari,” in which Colorado asks the Court to reframe the issues in the case.

As you would expect from the winner at the court below, Colorado wants the Supreme Court to deny DMA’s certiorari petition (for reasons Colorado will explain in a later brief). But Colorado also argues that if the Court grants DMA’s petition, the Court should answer only one question: “Should Quill be overturned?” (See p. 3).

In its cross-petition, Colorado presents a number of arguments why Quill’s days are numbered, focusing a great deal on the concerns of Supreme Court justices who have openly voiced opposition to Quill’s physical-presence (e.g., Justice Fortas in Bellas Hess, Justice White in Quill, and Justice Kennedy in Brohl I). But what is most interesting about Colorado’s petition is the reasons the state provides for why this case should be the vehicle for the Supreme Court to reconsider Quill. They are that:

  1. There is no tax liability is at stake. Colorado’s law doesn’t actually impose a collection obligation on out-of-state sellers, and the courts have suspended enforcement of the law until Brohl is resolved. The lack of a looming tax liability lets the Court ponder Quill without worrying about retroactive tax burdens on the parties.
  2. The Court is already familiar with the record in Brohl, and this record is well-developed, providing the Court with a “wealth of information.” (p. 34)
  3. Addressing Quill will fully resolve Brohl. If the Court overturns Quill, then DMA’s Commerce Clause claims are—according to the State of Colorado—mooted, because Quill is the only reason that the state requires out-of-state retailers to comply with a law that does not apply to in-state retailers.

We disagree that these considerations make Brohl II a good vehicle to review Quill (if the Supreme Court is so inclined). With respect to Colorado’s first contention, the Court has considered retroactive taxes extensively in past cases, so there is precedent available if that issue arises. And the other two considerations raised by Colorado are simply attempts to spin the central reason why Brohl II is a particularly bad vehicle for reviewing Quill: the validity of the physical-presence rule is not actually at issue in the case, meaning that the Court would be opining on an abstract question of law, rather than an actual dispute between the parties. Colorado admits as much when it notes that “[a]bsent Quill, Colorado would not have been required to enact the reporting law challenged here.” (p. 2). Moreover, the Tenth Circuit—which is bound to uphold Quill—affirmed Colorado’s use-tax notice and reporting provisions, agreeing that Quill did not create a constitutional bar to them.

Ultimately, we don’t expect Colorado’s cross-petition in Brohl II to be particularly compelling to the Supreme Court. Absent the Court’s refocusing the case, Brohl II does not present the question of whether Quill’s physical-presence rule should stand. What’s more, Brohl II’s timing is bad. As of yet, no appellate court has identified a facial conflict between Quill and a state sales and use tax law (though South Dakota and Alabama are working on it), and Congress continues to bat around ideas for creating a national system of remote-seller collection. At the end of the day, Colorado’s cross-petition may be just one more straw on the camel’s back. In the interim, we hasten to remind the states: the rule of law matters, and Quill is still good law.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Alston & Bird | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Alston & Bird on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.