Complex Litigation Quarterly (Spring 2015)

Bond Schoeneck & King PLLC
Contact

In this issue:

- SPECIAL REPORT: Increased Judicial Scrutiny for Restrictive Covenants and Claimed Trade Secrets

- CLASS ACTION UPDATE: Don’t Overlook CPLR § 901(b): New York’s Protection Against Class Actions for Statutory Penalties

- FLSA ALERT: Court Calls a Fault on Tennis Umpires’ Misclassification Argument

An excerpt from SPECIAL REPORT: Increased Judicial Scrutiny for Restrictive Covenants and Claimed Trade Secrets.

Two decisions from last year reflect the readiness of courts in the Second Circuit to rigorously analyze claims of “protectable interests” proffered by parties seeking to enforce non-compete agreements, and the reluctance of courts to enforce restrictive covenants that are more restrictive than necessary to protect a former employer’s legitimate interests.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Bond Schoeneck & King PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Bond Schoeneck & King PLLC
Contact
more
less

Bond Schoeneck & King PLLC on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide