Congress in Process of Passing Disapproval Resolution of Blacklisting Regulations

Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Contact
On February 2, 2017, by a vote of 236 to 187, the U.S. House of Representatives approved a joint resolution of disapproval to block the Final Rule implementing President Obama’s Executive Order 13673, “Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces.”  House Joint Resolution 37, an act authorized by the Congressional Review Act (“CRA”), is the first step toward rescinding the regulations issued under the Executive Order.  The CRA permits Congress to pass legislation rescinding a particular regulation.  The CRA has various time limits but the adoption of the final regulations under E.O. 13673 fell within the CRA time limits.
Rep. Virginia Foxx, Chair of the House Education and Workforce Committee , who sponsored the resolution, called the Executive Order “an unnecessary layer of red tape” in a government contracting landscape in which federal agencies already have tools at their disposal with which they can ensure contractors’ compliance with legal obligations.  The House vote tally nearly tracked party lines, with three Democrats joining the Republican legislators in voting “aye” on the disapproval resolution, and only one Republican voting “no.”
E.O. 13673 has been criticized by the employer community and employer associations because of the additional financial burdens it imposed on covered contractors, the risk to reputation and business from public disclosure of alleged violations before they are proven, and the fact that the procurement statutes and regulations already had enforcement mechanisms in place to ensure contractor compliance.  Referred to as the “blacklisting” order, as discussed in more detail here, the Executive Order and its implementing regulations would:
1. Require certain government contractors to disclose “labor law violations” under fourteen different statutes and Executive Orders when bidding for or modifying contracts;
2. Prohibit employers from entering into mandatory pre-dispute arbitration agreements with employees; and
3. Require certain disclosures to independent contractors and employees concerning their employment status and information about wages and hours worked.
The blacklisting order has already been stayed in large part.  As discussed here, last October Judge Marcia Crone, a federal judge sitting in Texas, issued a nationwide preliminary injunction blocking the requirement that contractors disclose “labor law violations” and the prohibition against entering into mandatory pre-dispute agreements with employees.  Judge Crone’s order left in place the paycheck transparency provisions requiring contractors to provide regular statements disclosing wages and benefits to employees.
An identical joint resolution is currently pending in the Senate.  If the Senate passes its resolution, and the President signs it, the Executive Order regulations will no longer have any force and effect and will be nullified in its entirety, a legislative act that will cover not only the provisions of the Order that have already been stayed, but the paycheck transparency provisions as well.  In addition, the CRA will preclude any future attempt to promulgate regulations requiring the same or similar procurement prohibitions and disclosures. We will continue to monitor the resolutions’ progress through both houses of Congress and the Executive Branch.

Written by:

Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Contact
more
less

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide