Copyright Law and the Fight Against Revenge Porn: Q&A With David Bateman of the Cyber Civil Rights Legal Project

by JD Supra Perspectives
Contact

When you live in a world where CDA 230 gives hosting companies immunity, you have to use the tools that are available to you, and copyright law just happens to be the best in our toolbox...

We recently spoke on the phone with attorney David A. Bateman, a Seattle-based partner at law firm K&L Gates with a long background in intellectual property, technology, and Internet law, to learn more about the work being done by the firm's Cyber Civil Rights Legal Project, which Bateman co-founded last year with Elisa J. D'Amico of K&L Gates' Miami office.

In late January The New York Times published a profile of the Cyber Civil Rights Legal Project and the pro bono efforts of 50 K&L Gates attorneys to help victims of revenge porn. We wanted to learn more about the project and, specifically, the strategy of using copyright law to fight such cases:

Q: To start, how did the Cyber Civil Rights Legal Project come into being?

Bateman: My background is in Internet law. For years I have worked with tech companies to do civil litigation and enforcement, whether it's piracy or privacy or cybersquatting.  Our Seattle office has really developed a great deal of cyber forensic experience.

Coincidentally, one of my colleagues in the Miami office [Elisa J. D'Amico] was working with a local group of women's lawyers and a prominent Miami law school professor, Mary Anne Franks, e advocating for the passage of a revenge porn statute in Florida. She came to realize that lawyers for revenge porn victims often didn't have the necessary cyber forensic expertise -- and that we had those capabilities in Seattle, but had never applied it to revenge porn. She convinced us to try it out. The combination worked out really well, with Elisa’s knowledge in the field and as a victim's advocate, and our Seattle team doing the cyber forensics.

We pitched that to the firm as a pro bono project, and it was received enthusiastically. We have 50 lawyers in the firm who have volunteered to do work on the project.

We launched in the fourth quarter of last year; it has been only four months now. We built a website for victims to contact us and obtain information. I am incredibly surprised at the volume of referrals and requests we've gotten. It's just overwhelming. It's eye-opening. Revenge porn is not something that I knew that much about before ... but when you get into it, it's unbelievable.

Q: What types of cases are you seeing?

When a victim contacts us, their goals fall into three categories. Almost always, their main goal is to get their photos offline. And that is no small task in and of itself. The second thing they often want to do is start a civil lawsuit and try to get their ex- (or whoever posted the photos) to be held responsible. And some are looking to see the people involved arrested and to get law enforcement involved. So these are the three buckets that we're usually helping people with.

…this is not just about pictures; it's online harassment.

Although many victims need counseling, that’s not our area of expertise and we refer victims to other support organizations.  But we always recognize that revenge porn is usually a symptom of a broader problem; it's not happening in isolation. It is an act in a tableau of bigger relationship issues, bigger emotional issues. Often it's only one type of harassment that the victims are experiencing. And usually, when the bad actor lashes out, "revenge porn," as we call it, is only one vehicle; sometimes it'll be coupled with harassing phone calls, with stalking, sometimes with blackmail, pressuring the victim with threats to release intimate photos.  So, for counseling and support, our team works with some of these organizations, such as CCRI (Cyber Civil Rights Initiative) and a group called End Revenge Porn, both of which have counseling and outreach and help victims in other ways that we aren't able to.

Q: Can you describe the nuts and bolts of the legal strategy and the tools that the Cyber Civil Rights Legal Project is using?

Let's start with the world of online take-down. There are dozens of websites that specialize in revenge porn, expressly dedicated to the posting of images of ex-girlfriends or ex-boyfriends.  Each of those websites is a commercial enterprise; it makes money with advertising. It's focused on this particular type of photography.

But we begin our legal analysis with remembering that the CDA [Communications Decency Act Section 230], a foundation of all Internet law, provides that website operators are generally immune from liability for user-generated content. And that's why these sites can exist. The legal concept is that, as long as you run these sites as an agnostic hosting company, you are entitled to CDA 230 immunity.

If you have postings that are defamatory or unfair or unseemly but have nothing to do with intellectual property, the website operator has no liability for them and can ignore any requests to take them down.

The exception to CDA 230 immunity is intellectual property law. If you have postings that are defamatory or unfair or unseemly but have nothing to do with intellectual property, the website operator has no liability for them and can ignore any requests to take them down. A classic example of that would be craigslist. There was a series of cases where state officials were trying to hold craigslist liable for sex trafficking because of personal ads that were on the site. In every case, federal judges ruled very clearly that the site was protected by CDA 230 immunity. You may not like the content of these sites, but if it was generated by a user, this federal law says the websites are immune.

The exception to CDA 230 immunity arises from intellectual property law. Thus, people who want to get things removed from websites often rely on intellectual property law and, in particular, on the DMCA, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The DMCA has been used forever by record companies and movie studios to get copyright-infringing content taken down from websites. And that's how most victims of revenge porn get their pictures taken down: by sending DMCA notices to the websites. Now, that works only if you have copyrights in the images that have been posted. And under the federal copyright law, the person who takes a “selfie” is the photographer and therefore has copyrights in those images, whereas a person who is simply a model or the subject of the photograph, and is not the photographer, does not.

The exception to CDA 230 immunity arises from intellectual property law.

In our representation of victims, we sometimes contact the photographer and ask them to assign the copyrights to the victim. My experience is that many times the photographer, when contacted by a law firm, is willing to be cooperative and contrite. These postings often occur in the heat of the moment and, upon reflection, the poster is willing to be more helpful. In other cases, the photographer is not the person who has posted them, or claims not to be. Some make assertions such as "my computer was hacked, or someone broke into my account somewhere or I lost my phone. ..." If they maintain their innocence, they are much more likely to execute a copyright assignment.

Q: How often does that happen? Do some of these cases go away pretty quickly when they're contacted by a firm talking about copyright?

Getting the copyright assignment from the ex- is much more likely to occur than you would guess -- maybe half the time we can get that copyright assignment. But whether you had copyrights in the original photos or obtained those rights by assignment, the question then becomes: How successful can you be taking these images offline? The DMCA requires people to remove infringing images, but that is effective only if the website is subject to U.S. law and only if they're actually following the law. It is no simple task to clean the Internet of these images -- even if you have the legal right. We always need to make a distinction between having the right to take them down and being effective in getting them offline -- and that's especially true when the photos or videos have gone viral, and they've been posted to hundreds of different sites.  In that case, you have to invest the effort of going site by site, link by link, to do this Internet hygiene. We have a dedicated “DMCA team” of three lawyers who spend all their time simply working on the take-down process. This is not the litigation; rather, they capture the evidence and preserve it so that we can use it later, and contact the sites where the copyrighted images are posted and try to get them taken down.

So that's how copyright law oddly plays into it. Copyright law wasn't designed for revenge porn; it just happens to be the effective mechanism. When you live in a world where CDA 230 gives hosting companies immunity, you have to use the tools that are available to you, and copyright law just happens to be the best in our toolbox.

Copyright law wasn't designed for revenge porn; it just happens to be the effective mechanism.

Of course, there are ways sites can destroy their immunity under CDA 230, and that is now being litigated in the revenge porn context. In fact, you'll see that, a few days ago, the California attorney general obtained a criminal conviction against the operator of the website YouGotPosted. And the reason they were able to do that is that the web site owner there was more than an agnostic host for third-party content; he did things beyond simply being a passive bulletin board for the posting of these images. The FTC had another victory against a different site operator. The claims against some of these website operators can be based on identity theft, extortion, or other criminal behavior.

Q: Now, you're restricting yourselves to civil cases?

That's right. We will, many times, help clients organize their evidentiary material and help them contact and work with law enforcement, but the decision about prosecuting and going forward with a criminal case is not ours.

Q: This appears to be a rapidly evolving area right now, with the San Diego trial, the FTC getting involved, and a number of states that are taking this on, while others are saying they don't want to touch it. I'm curious as to how you deal with the issue as events accelerate.

It's a particularly interesting time. It's another of those instances where we're learning about the consequences of using technology in ways that seem to be appropriate. Look, there is nothing wrong with sharing intimate photos in a relationship; that has happened for centuries. But the new technology makes it much more rampant and preservable and distributable. In the old days, if you had a long-distance relationship and shared a Polaroid by mail, when the relationship was over, that probably didn't go anywhere. Now, you have a camera at your disposal 24/7, the sharing of images has become very customary, they get preserved for eternity, and it takes only a moment to upload them to a distribution platform that lets the whole world see them. It's not a different issue; it's a different time of technology.

My sense is, for the last four or five or six years, people have been having this problem, and no one recognized it as a problem. There's been a lot of work by industry, by advocacy groups, by government and law enforcement to publicize it, and that's why we're hearing so much more about it. We're seeing it in the news because there's now a lot of enforcement around it, not because it's just starting to happen. So, yes, it is an evolving practice area, but no different than most areas of technology when they intersect the law. This is what Internet lawyers have been doing since the beginning of the Internet, looking at how human behavior that happens in the brick-and-mortar world translates to the Internet, and how the legal world can address it. And you're correct, with the new focus on it, there is a lot more energy being put into specific statutes dealing with cyber exploitation, instead of using the traditional common-law claims that are used in civil litigation.

 It's not a different issue; it's a different time of technology.

If we have a client who wants to go beyond take-down and wants to move into filing a civil lawsuit, we have a couple considerations. First, it's somewhat ironic that, to get relief for this invasion of privacy, our client has to file a public complaint. This could be one of the worst moments in their life, and they need no more publicity about it, but yet they have to go out publicly, file a lawsuit and have it picked up in the news. That can be a problem, but we can overcome that by filing pseudonymously, which is permitted in many states. The next question is: Do you know who the defendant is? In many cases, the victim knows, because the ex- has confessed to the postings. In some cases, the victim may have a strong suspicion because that's the only person they shared the photos with.  But in others, as I mentioned before, the ex- may claim that their computer was hacked or that they didn't distribute these photos -- and that might even be true. If we don’t have relative certainty about the identity of the defendant, we file what we call John Doe lawsuits -- a common practice in Internet law -- and you then follow the forensic path to try to unmask the proper defendant.

Q: It seems like you see that a lot in file-sharing cases.

Exactly. A copyright owner knows that someone has infringed their intellectual property; they have some IP addresses but they need to file a case and use subpoena power to unmask the defendants. We need to do that in some of our cases. We file against the John Doe and we subpoena the forensic evidence before naming the defendant. A very quick unmasking may take two months -- and sometimes, it takes many more months.

Although there's a lot of focus these days on enacting particular statutes that provide a civil cause of action for revenge porn, in my view, there has always been tort law that covers this type of behavior in every state. There are tort claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress, outrage, invasion of privacy, the publication of private facts -- each state has different tort law, but at its heart, there always seem to be claims that fit very well for this type of behavior.

Another legal avenue is to file a copyright lawsuit. If you take a photo, you have innate copyrights in it, but you can't sue on those rights unless you first register with the Copyright Office. So sometimes we help our clients register their copyrights so they get added protection for the images and can sue in federal court.

This is what Internet lawyers have been doing since the beginning of the Internet, looking at how human behavior that happens in the brick-and-mortar world translates to the Internet, and how the legal world can address it.

Q: Is there a preferred avenue? Is that the recommended course, if they have it, to get the copyright protection and go to federal court?

I think that's very much a judgment call on the part of the lawyer who is handling the case. My view is that a federal copyright lawsuit is not particularly necessary because the state law claims are strong and available. And again, there's some irony there, that to bring a case based on the disclosure of private facts, you have to publicly file for a copyright registration for these images.

Q: Are some people not willing to do that for obvious reasons? Are they advised to take a different path in that case?

Many people are startled to even hear about that recommendation. It seems bizarre to them. But there are mechanisms for doing it where the information can be kept fairly private. There are techniques for doing a copyright registration that do not require the actual publication of these photos again.

Q: Are you getting cases from pretty much all over the country?

We have lawyers on three continents now in our project; we have folks in the EU, Australia, and the U.S. Most of our contacts come from the U.S. It is a fairly random sampling. Not surprisingly, the more populous states are represented proportionally. The one outlier is California; I'd say 40 percent of our U.S. referrals are residents of California. I don't attribute that to the natural fact that everyone in California is more beautiful or likely to be taking photos of themselves because they're so hip. I think it's because the law enforcement and public officials in California, and the media in California, have done a very good job of publicizing this issue, and therefore victims in California are more likely to know that they're victims and more likely to look for help.

Q: I assume all your cases, or at least the ones you handle, are with adults?

We do get contacted by minors, and we very quickly steer them to law enforcement. We help them get to the right resources -- and yes, we've had incidents where law enforcement reacted quickly and they are going out and arresting people.

Q: How unusual is it that you all are doing this work? There seems to be a certain amount of push-back in some quarters about pursuing these cases, partly because of First Amendment concerns. Is it unusual for law firms to be taking up this issue?

I think you're correct in that we have found a niche where there was a very large segment of the population who just did not have access to legal resources. Without free legal services, a victim must have a significant amount of money to obtain a lawyer, whether it's 10 thousand or 20 thousand or 30 thousand dollars. It's a big barrier for people to get legal representation. I think what we've done is lower that barrier by providing pro bono representation.  We're not inventing the law. We're putting resources toward it. And that’s consistent with our firm's pro bono mission.

We're not inventing the law. We're putting resources toward it.

Our firm has many pro bono initiatives; we work in every local region with pro bono groups. This project, though, happens to resonate among many of our young lawyers.  I think the young lawyers recognize it for the problem that it is, and that's why we've had such an overwhelming turnout and people are willing to dedicate their time to this.

Q: You have 50 lawyers in the project as a whole, is that right?

All from our firm. We have three teams; one is a team of intake lawyers who work directly with the victims, learn and distill their problems, and  try to figure out how best to solve them. Another team is the cyber forensic folks who do the DMCA take-downs and the electronic tracing; they are our technology backbone. And then we have a large group of litigation lawyers who will take on the civil cases in their local area and run them. It's really turned into a practice group of its own. We get probably 50 revenge porn referrals a month these days.

Q: In what sense is this project a first?

There are many lawyers who have represented revenge porn victims for much longer than we have; we didn't invent this. There are wonderfully talented lawyers who've been out there fighting this fight for several years, developing the techniques, working on strategies, and they have helped educate us -- so we're standing on the shoulders of giants here. We're not inventing this all ourselves.

I think it's the first large law firm commitment to revenge porn on a pro bono basis. And we bring with us our cyberforensic capabilities. The normal course, as a victim, might be to go to a family lawyer -- they understand harassment, they just might not have the expertise in DMCA take-downs or tracing IP addresses. That cyberforensic talent, I think, is really helpful to rounding out the whole package.

Q: As you say, a lot of it is a natural progression from the other work you all have been doing on IP or Internet law.

That's right. This is a very natural fit. It almost doesn't matter what the subject matter is; you just use the standard legal and forensic tools, and we're lucky enough to be able to apply them in this situation where people really need the help.

Q: How do you see this area evolving over time? Given the increased attention being paid to revenge porn specifically and to cyberharassment in general, do you think there will be more roadblocks preventing people from committing these types of actions?

My hope is that the publicity that's being generated by enforcement actions now will have two deterrent effects: one is that it will make people think a little more carefully before they take that picture and send it to someone else. The other is that it will make someone think very carefully before they disclose that Internet picture online. And if you can deter the behavior, you're much better off than doing enforcement. I do think enforcement is going to continue, and I believe we'll see a resulting uptick in successful cases, and hopefully that will ultimately educate people. It's very important here to never blame the victim. The sharing of these types of photos happens all the time; we need to educate people about the consequences of it -- but the crime is not the taking of the picture; the crime is the distribution of it without someone's consent.

Q: Can you speak about the current status of the cases you're taking on?

Many people come to us and just want the material taken down. We do that very quickly and very efficiently, and our clients are happy. That is routinely the most common event. For the cases where we're actually litigating, they are all in various stages: We have civil cases that we have file and are progressing; we have clients who have active criminal cases and we're assisting in those; and we have stepped in to some civil cases that had been previously filed, and we are helping to add our cyberforensic team to those cases.
If you could find a way to fund it, you could have an infinite number of clients. I was at a conference recently and they said there an estimated 850,000 victims a year. I don't want to blow this out of proportion; we are not curing cancer, and this is certainly not the worst online exploitation in the world. We just happened to find that this is the right balance for our skills, and a vulnerable segment of the population that really doesn't have representation.

Q: Could you speak a little about the decision to form the project and how you get buy-in for that type of thing and resources, staff time and attorney time?

That's a great question. Our firm has a very long history of pro bono work and dedicating resources to pro bono projects. That being said, you can imagine the odd conversation that I had with our firm managing partner when I mentioned to him the term "revenge porn." Our managing partner, Pete Kalis, is a very forward-thinking fellow, and he understood quickly that this is really an issue of civil rights. And that's why we call it the Cyber Civil Rights Legal Project. It is fighting for people's right to control their own online images. And he realized that this resonates with a lot of the lawyers at the firm, and he gave us a green light to do it.
Although the term “revenge porn” is provocative and was probably new and startling to many of our partners when they first heard it, I think everyone understands the problem now. It’s just been remarkable and very comforting to get such broad support, not just from the firm but from the individual lawyers themselves; they're the ones who make the decision if they want to participate -- so you have the firm embracing it and all of these lawyers rising to the challenge, because they understand the problem.

I think it's the first large law firm commitment to revenge porn on a pro bono basis.

People get a little concerned about the word "revenge porn" … I don't like the term, and for this reason: This is not about pornography. These are intimate pictures that people are sharing that are sexual in nature or not sexual in nature. It's not pornography in any sense … but the fact is, the word "revenge porn" grabs your interest; it’s startling; it's sort of shocking. And if it grabs people's attention, I think we have to use it.

Most of this is not about the photos or videos alone.  It's not just "here's your picture"; it's accompanied by: "here's your picture, here's your name, here's your Facebook link, here's where you work, I'm sending a picture to your mother, and I'm posting it on a site to ask men to come visit." That's the usual combination. And it creates a situation where the top Google searches for a victim’s name come up with links to revenge porn sites.  It ruins victims’ employment opportunities and it can result in losing a job or dropping out of school.  So, talking about the images alone is a little too clinically isolated; this is usually a much bigger issue ... It's cyber-exploitation; this is not just about pictures; it's online harassment.

Q: From a layman's standpoint, that all sounds like something that should land a perpetrator in a boiling pot of legal trouble pretty fast, but obviously, it's not that cut-and-dried.

You know what I'd say? The perpetrators of this can only be brought to justice if there are enforcement resources who are able and interested to deal with it. A victim has a barrier to entry to get a civil lawyer because of the cost, knowing where to go to get a lawyer, and finding a lawyer experienced in revenge porn. That's on the civil side. On the criminal side, while we do have clients who are getting great responses from law enforcement, there are many others who tell us they went to the police, and they got no traction.

The perpetrators of this can only be brought to justice if there are enforcement resources who are able and interested to deal with it.

Some victims are frustrated to hear, "Eh, this is on the Internet, it’s not in our jurisdiction” or “honey, you shouldn't have taken those pictures." It’s an unfortunate fact that sometimes law enforcement are not sensitive to it, or they don't have the time to deal with it, or frankly they just have other priorities. So to your question of how do they get away with it ... I think a lot of it is a resources question.

Q: And that's where you all come in.

That's right. That's why we're there. I think we're the finger in the dike. There's a wall of water behind us, and we're throwing 50 lawyers at it, but there could be 50 thousand.

*

[This interview has been edited for length and clarity.]
 

 

comments powered by Disqus

Written by:

JD Supra Perspectives
Contact
more
less

JD Supra Perspectives on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.