Court Declares Kansas Surcharging Ban Unconstitutional

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
Contact

On February 10, 2021, legislation was introduced to repeal Kansas’s ban on surcharging. A mere two weeks later, a federal judge essentially ensured its end by declaring the statute unconstitutional.

Surcharging is a process whereby merchants impose a fee on consumers who elect to pay by credit card in order to recoup the additional processing costs associated with accepting card payments. Kansas’s anti-surcharge statute, codified at K.S.A. 16a-2-403, permitted merchants to allow discounts for customers paying by cash instead of credit card. In the fall of 2020, CardX, LLC (“CardX”) filed a lawsuit seeking to invalidate Kansas’s prohibition on surcharging, arguing that it was an unconstitutional restraint on the right of free speech. CardX is a software technology company with software that allows merchants to display prices, including cost surcharges on purchases made by credit card, and thereby allows consumers to comparison shop among payment types.

In granting CardX’s motion for summary judgment, the Court held that the free speech restrictions arising from Kansas’s surcharging ban do not advance substantial state interests “in a direct and material way and in proportion to those interests,” such that it improperly infringes on CardX’s right of free speech. “Ultimately,” the Court noted, “[The Attorney General] has the unenviable task of attempting to justify a speech restriction that rests on little more than the State’s preferred manner of describing economic transactions.” After all, it pointed out surcharges and discounts describe the same state of affairs: cash purchasers pay less and credit card purchasers pay more because of the cost associated with using credit cards. Citing Judge Tjoflat’s memorable line in Dana’s RR. Supply v. Atty. Gen., Fla., 807 F.3d 1235 (11th Cir. 2015), the Court held that Kansas’s statute does not ban surcharges; it merely targets expression and could be called a “surcharges-are-fine-just-don’t-call-them-that-law.” Though the Court held that the statute was unconstitutional “as applied to CardX,” it did not elaborate on any instances where the statute could be applied in a constitutional manner.

While it remains to be seen whether Kansas’s surcharging ban will ultimately be repealed, it appears that with the Court’s ruling in the CardX case, Kansas joins the majority of states that permit surcharging by merchants.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Arnall Golden Gregory LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
Contact
more
less

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.