Court Finds No Business In This Show Business Trademark Dispute

by Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition

It is a basic principle of trademark law that a mark can only be assigned with the goodwill of the business to which the mark relates, for the good reason that the mark is in fact inseparable from the business.  But what kind of “business” is necessary to support ownership of a mark?  A recent decision by the Federal Court in the Southern District of New York in Creative Arts by Calloway, LLC v. Brooks, a dispute among members of the family of the late musician Cab Calloway, sheds light on this issue.

The plaintiff, a company owned by the widow of Cab Calloway and some other Calloway family members, claimed ownership of the mark CAB CALLOWAY and had filed a PTO service mark application for use in connection with various retail, music and entertainment services.  The defendant, a grandson of Cab Calloway, had used the mark THE CAB CALLOWAY ORCHESTRA for musical performances.  The plaintiff and defendant had been engaged in litigation related to Cab Calloway’s musical legacy for many years, but the issue in this case related to the plaintiff’s service mark application, which was filed in 1999.  The defendant had opposed the application based on his prior use of the mark THE CAB CALLOWAY ORCHESTRA, and the TTAB upheld the opposition.  The plaintiff challenged that decision in the Federal Court.

The plaintiff’s application to register CAB CALLOWAY had originally been filed by Cab Calloway’s widow on an intent-to-use basis.  The application had been assigned to the plaintiff in 2001, before any Amendment to Allege Use or Statement of Use had been filed.  Under 15 U.S.C. §1060, an intent-to-use application may only be assigned “to a successor to the business of the applicant, or portion thereof, to which the mark pertains, if that business is ongoing and existing”.  The purpose of this Lanham Act provision is to prevent trafficking in intent-to-use applications.  In this case, the defendant moved for summary judgment on the basis that Mrs. Calloway was not operating an ongoing and existing business related to the mark at the time the assignment was made.

The evidence in the case was that Mrs. Calloway had taken no steps to market, merchandise, advertise, promote or sell products bearing Cab Calloway’s name, likeness, voice or caricature before the assignment was made in 2001.  In fact, one member of the plaintiff had conceded in her deposition that the plaintiff was still “attempting” to start its business in 2001, after the assignment had taken place.  Mrs. Calloway had, however, used Cab Calloway’s name in connection with receipt of royalties from his works and in connection with approving use of his image or name.  This was insufficient for the court, which held that:

Approving the use of Cab Calloway’s name or likeness in exchange for payment – particularly without taking any steps to “market, merchandise, advertise, promote, or sell products bearing Cab Calloway’s name, likeness, voice or caricature” or develop a public expectation regarding the Cab Calloway brand – does not rise to the level of operating a business to which the mark “CAB CALLOWAY” pertains.

Although Mrs. Calloway had re-licensed the use of the Cab Calloway name to the Cab Calloway School of the Arts, that re-licensing was held by the court not to rise to the level of operating an ongoing and existing business.  The court stated that the licensing activity, to the School of the Arts and to a number of other licensees, had amounted only to “personal stewardship or management of assets”.

The difference between such “stewardship” and a licensing program that could constitute an ongoing business was not completely clear from the judgment.  Certainly, ownership rights in a mark can be sustained through use by a controlled licensee (see TMEP §1201.03(f)), and so licensing could, in theory, constitute operation of an ongoing business.  However, the court seems to have made a distinction between a properly documented licensing program with control of use of the mark by the licensor (which the plaintiff had not been able to establish) and the series of somewhat haphazard permissions that the plaintiff was able to show.

Similarly, Mrs. Calloway’s retention of professional advisors in connection with administration of her rights, and discussions relating to a possible Broadway musical, were held not to constitute operation of an ongoing business.

Accordingly, the court found that the intent-to-use application was not validly transferred to the plaintiff and summary judgment was granted in favor of the defendant.

This case is a reminder that if you wish to assign an intent-to-use trademark application and you are unsure whether a business pertaining to the mark has been established, it is best to wait until you are sure.  If the business relates to licensing the mark rather than using it, the licensing program must be properly documented.  When the assignment is made, you should consider assigning other assets as well (such as customer lists and business plans) in order to support an argument that an ongoing business is being transferred.  Lastly, remember that an improperly assigned application is void ab initio and cannot be cured, so the applicant will lose the priority date of the ITU and will have to file a new application.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition

Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.