Criticizing WOTUS Is Like Shooting Fish in a Barrel

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law
Contact

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law

On Wednesday, EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers announced that they plan to revise the definition of “Waters of the United States”.  Simultaneously, DOJ moved to remand the Navigable Waters Protection Rule, in a challenge to the Trump-era rule brought by the Conservation Law Foundation.  Can you say “déjà vu all over again”?

This is such a target-rich environment that I almost don’t know where to begin – but I’ll try.

First, EPA Administrator Regan stated that EPA and the Corps:

are committed to establishing a durable definition of ‘waters of the United States’ based on Supreme Court precedent and drawing from the lessons learned from the current and previous regulations, as well as input from a wide array of stakeholders, so we can better protect our nation’s waters, foster economic growth, and support thriving communities.

Whatever one’s political persuasions, it would be fair to say that that was precisely the objective of the Obama administration in 2015 and the Trump administration in 2019.  What makes the current administration think that what they promulgate will be any more “durable” than those prior efforts?

One has to assume that the new rule will be similar in substance to the 2015 rule, given that the Biden administration presumably trusts the science behind that rule, while having more bright line exemptions to satisfy those on the right.  Good luck threading that needle.

Next, it’s notable that the DOJ motion in the CLF litigation did not seek vacatur of the NWPR, arguing that there was no need for vacatur, because EPA and the Corps will be reviewing the very legal questions raised by the challenge to the NWPR.  Yet, while arguing that vacatur is not necessary, EPA and the Corps assert that the NWPR “is significantly reducing clean water protections.”  If that’s the case, and particularly where there is no timeline for promulgation of a new rule, one would have thought that EPA and the Corps would want to put a halt to such environmental degradation.

Oh, what a tangled web we weave when  we keep trying to define Waters of the United States.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law
Contact
more
less

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.