D.C. District Court Formalizes Remand of Allina Case Regarding the Appropriate Treatment of Medicare Part C Patient Days for Purposes of DSH

King & Spalding
Contact

On May 18, 2015, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered HHS to adjudicate the appropriate treatment of Medicare Part C patient days in determining disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments.  The order effectuates the D.C. Circuit’s prior ruling from April 1, 2014, which held that HHS failed to provide appropriate notice for its 2004 final rule on DSH treatment of Part C patient days.  See Allina Health Servs. v. Sebelius, 746 F.3d 1102 (D.C. Cir. 2014).

Under the 2004 final rule, inpatient days for Part C beneficiaries paid under Part C of the Medicare statute were nonetheless treated as days for which the beneficiaries were “entitled to benefits under Part A.”  This interpretation substantially affected certain hospitals’ DSH payments and, according to the D.C. Circuit, was not a “logical outgrowth” of the proposed rule, given that CMS had proposed to codify its policy of not treating Part C days as days “entitled to benefits under Part A.” 

In its April 2014 opinion, the D.C. Circuit left open the question of whether HHS could, in the absence of the invalidated regulation, reach the same conclusion through individual adjudication.  This portion of the D.C. Circuit’s ruling was at odds with the district court’s opinion, which instead specifically instructed HHS to recalculate the hospitals’ DSH payments without treating Part C days as days entitled to benefits under Part A.

The order is primarily a formality since, as the court itself notes, “the Secretary recognized the remand without formal order.”

To view the May 18, 2015 order, click here.  To view the April 1, 2014 opinion, click here.

Reporter, Isabella Edmundson, Atlanta, GA, + 1 404 572 3527, iedmundson@kslaw.com.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© King & Spalding | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

King & Spalding
Contact
more
less

King & Spalding on:

Reporters on Deadline

Related Case Law

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.