DAMITT Q2 2019: New Industry Analysis Sheds Light on Significant Investigations By Sector

Dechert LLP
Contact

Dechert LLP

Fast Facts

United States

  • U.S. antitrust enforcement agencies concluded 20 “significant investigations” during the rolling-twelve months (RTM) ended Q2 2019, down from 28 for the RTM ended Q2 2018.
  • These significant investigations took an average of 11.4 months from announcement to completion for the RTM ended Q2 2019, compared to 9.9 months in the RTM ended Q2 2018.
  • More of these significant investigations had vertical issues. A full 25 percent of significant investigations for the RTM ended Q2 2019 had vertical aspects, compared to 18 percent for the RTM ended Q2 2018.
  • DOJ has been more successful than the FTC in streamlining significant investigations. More than 80 percent of DOJ’s H1 2019 significant investigations lasted fewer than 10 months, while 75 percent of the FTC’s significant investigations lasted more than 16 months and only one lasted fewer than 10 months.
  • New DAMITT industry data show that the Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals industry keeps the U.S. agencies the busiest, accounting for nearly a third of the significant investigations since 2011; but the Technology industry has recently spiked higher, accounting for 40 percent of H1 2019 activity.

Europe

  • The EU Commission concluded 29 “significant investigations” during the RTM ended Q2 2019, up 20 percent from the RTM ended Q2 2018.
  • The average duration of Phase II investigations resolved in the RTM ended Q2 2019 and the prior RTM remained steady at 13.3 months; whereas the average duration of significant Phase I investigations resolved in the RTM ended Q2 2019 was 8.5 months, compared to 7.1 months in the RTM ended Q2 2018.
  • Three transactions have been prohibited so far in 2019—the highest number for any year since 2001. But this does not necessarily reflect increased enforcement vigor given that the blocked transactions reportedly involved highly concentrated industries.
  • Transactions involving Industrial Products & Services have accounted for the largest proportion of significant investigations since 2011 (32 percent), followed by the Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals industry (12 percent). Ninety percent of significant healthcare investigations were resolved in Phase I, in part due to the Commission’s extensive body of published decisions, which facilitates faster reviews.
  • Over the 2011-2019 period tracked by DAMITT, 90 percent of significant transactions in the Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals sector were cleared in Phase I.

The Dechert Antitrust Merger Investigation Timing Tracker (DAMITT) is a quarterly release from Dechert LLP reporting on trends in significant merger control investigations in the United States (U.S.) and European Union (EU).

In the U.S., “significant” merger investigations include Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act reportable transactions for which the result of the investigation by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) or the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ) is a consent order, a complaint challenging the transaction, an official closing statement by the reviewing antitrust agency, or the abandonment of the transaction with the antitrust agency issuing a press release.

In light of the procedural differences between the EU and U.S., DAMITT defines “significant” EU merger investigations to include transactions subject to the EU Merger Regulation and resulting in either Phase I remedies or the initiation of a Phase II investigation.

DAMITT calculates the durations of significant investigations in both jurisdictions from the date of deal announcement to the completion of the investigation, which therefore includes the time attributable to all pre-notification/consultation efforts.

Number of Significant US Merger Investigations and Complaints Declines

The U.S. antitrust agencies concluded 10 significant merger investigations in H1 2019, compared to 13 in H1 2018. The 20 significant U.S. merger investigations concluded by the DOJ and FTC over the RTM ended Q2 2019 reflected a decline of nearly 30 percent from the 28 that were concluded during the RTM ended Q2 2018.

Over the 12 months ended Q2 2019, only one significant merger investigation (Quad Graphics/LSC Communications)resulted in a complaint seeking to block the transaction, compared to the five complaints that were filed in the prior 12-month period. However, two deals — Securus Technologies/Inmate Calling Solutions and Republic National/Breakthru Beverage — were abandoned in Q2 2019 in the face of litigation threats by the agencies, compared to one abandonment in 2018.

The relative frequency with which U.S. significant investigations raise vertical issues continues to increase. Vertical issues arose in 30 percent of significant investigations in H1 2019, compared to 23 percent in H1 2018. For the RTM ended Q2 2019, the comparable figure was 25 percent, up from 18 percent in the RTM ended Q2 2018.

Number of Significant EU Investigations on Pace with 2018

The EU Commission concluded three significant EU merger investigations in Q2 2019, bringing the total number for H1 2019 to 11. This count is in line with H1 2018 and on pace to match the average of 21 significant merger investigations per year over the 2011-2018 period tracked by DAMITT.

Two of the three significant EU merger investigations resolved in Q2 2019 were cleared with remedies, including one transaction in Phase I and one transaction in Phase II. The remaining transaction, Tata Steel/Thyssenkrupp/JV, was prohibited following a Phase II investigation, which brings the total number of transactions that have been blocked so far in 2019 up to three.

This is already the highest number of prohibitions in any year since the EU Commission suffered a series of damaging reversals in the EU courts in 2002, and the annulment of three prohibition decisions. The multiple prohibitions may, however, not necessarily reflect an increased vigor of enforcement. It is possible that the cases were challenging (each of the three transactions reportedly would have led to the creation of market leaders in already highly concentrated industries), or that the parties were not willing to offer remedies satisfactory to the Commission.

Additionally, it bears noting that two of the transactions (Wieland/Aurubis and Tata Steel/Thyssenkrupp/JV) were notified following mergers involving their respective competitors. So the key takeaway from these transactions is perhaps that there may be a first-mover advantage in a consolidating industry: the EU Commission operates a priority principle by which the first transaction to be notified will be assessed as if there were no second transaction pending. By contrast, U.S. authorities do not apply a strict priority principle, and may in some circumstances assess the impact of multiple pending transactions in combination.

Duration of Significant US Investigations Continues to Increase

The length of significant U.S. investigations continues to rise. For H1 2019, the average duration from the announcement of the deal to the conclusion of the investigation was 12.1 months, up from 10.2 months in H1 2018. For the RTM ended Q2 2019, the average was 11.4 months, up from 9.9 months in the RTM ended Q2 2018.

At nearly 19 months, UnitedHealth’s acquisition of DaVita Medical Group provoked the longest significant U.S. merger investigation concluded in H1 2019 and the eighth-longest since 2011.

Significant U.S. investigations with vertical aspects concluding in H1 2019 averaged about 15.3 months, compared to 10.8 months for the remainder of deals concluding in H1 2019. These H1 2019 results align with DAMITT’s prior finding that significant U.S. investigations with vertical aspects tend to last longer on average than those without vertical aspects.

Citing DAMITT findings, both the U.S. DOJ and FTC announced planned reforms to the merger review process in late 2018. To date, DOJ has made strides with its reforms in shortening the review process, as more than 80 percent of DOJ’s H1 2019 significant investigations lasted fewer than ten months. In marked contrast, however, 75 percent of the FTC’s significant investigations concluded during H1 2019 lasted more than 16 months and only one lasted fewer than ten months. DAMITT will continue to observe whether this clear difference in duration between the two federal agencies continues to hold in future months.

While prior DAMITT analyses found that antitrust merger litigation added an additional five to seven months to the merger process, no merger litigations have completed during H1 2019. The only significant U.S. investigation resulting in a complaint during H1 2019 (Quad Graphics/LSC Communications) was filed by DOJ on June 26, 2019 and a trial on the legality of the merger was scheduled to begin on November 14, 2019 —which is 148 days later.

In comparison, antitrust merger cases commenced between 2015 and 2018 started on average about 107 days after the complaint was filed. Although Quad and LSC have since abandoned their transaction, the scheduled litigation was atypical in that if the merger had been deemed unlawful by the court, the judge had ordered the parties to establish a separate case schedule for a hearing on any remedy proposed by the merging companies. If followed by other courts, this bifurcation would make it even more difficult for companies proposing a merger remedy to hold their deals together through a lengthy investigation, lengthy litigation on the legality of the merger, and additional litigation over any proposed remedy.

Duration of EU Phase II Cases Remains Constant but Phase I Remedy Cases Taking Longer

The duration of significant Phase I remedy cases continues to increase: the average duration of investigations resolved over the RTM ended Q2 2019 – 8.5 months – is up 20 percent from the prior RTM period.

The average duration of Phase II proceedings concluded in the RTM ended Q2 2019 remained constant at 13.3 months compared to the prior RTM period, although there was a sharp increase in the average duration of Phase II investigations resolved in H1 2019 from the average in 2018.

EU Phase II Proceedings

The 15.5-month average duration for Phase II proceedings resolved in H1 2019 is about three months longer than the 2018 average of 12.5 months, and longer even than the 2017 record of 15.1 months. This increase is likely related to three complex Phase II investigations that were concluded in H1 2019 (BASF/Solvay’s EP and P&I Business, Siemens/Alstom and Tata Steel/Thyssenkrupp/JV), for which the average duration was nearly 18 months. Indeed, the review of Tata Steel/Thyssenkrupp/JV took nearly 21 months from announcement to prohibition, making it the third longest investigation in the 2011-H1 2019 period tracked by DAMITT.

Notwithstanding the higher H1 2019 average duration, Phase II investigations concluded during the RTM ended Q2 2019 averaged 13.3 months, which is in line with the previous RTM period.

The average time between the announcement and notification of Phase II transactions resolved during the RTM ended Q2 2019 was 6.1 months, which is broadly in line with the average of 6.5 months in the prior RTM period. Tata Steel/Thyssenkrupp/JV had an unusually long pre-notification period of 12 months; excluding that deal would bring the H1 2019 average of 7.7 months from announcement to notification (an increase of almost two months from the 2018 average) down to a more typical 6.6 months.

Article 10(3) of the EU Merger Regulation allows merging companies to grant “voluntary” extensions of time. These extensions are commonly conceded by merging parties at the urging of staff. Both Phase II investigations concluded in Q2 2019 entailed the use of such extensions, adding the statutory maximum 20 working days to the investigation period. This is consistent with the pattern of the maximum possible extension being invoked over the 2011-2018 period tracked by DAMITT.

EU Phase I Remedy Cases

On average, Phase I remedy cases in H1 2019 lasted 8.1 months, slightly down from the 2018 average of 8.4 months. However, the average duration of investigations concluded in the RTM ended Q2 2019 of 8.5 months is 20 percent longer than those concluded in the previous RTM period. This suggests that the trend of year-on-year increases observed since 2016 continues unabated. Phase I investigations resolved with remedies now tend to require more than five times the theoretical duration of the fixed timetable under the EU Merger Regulation.

The average duration of pre-notification contacts (i.e., from announcement until notification) mirrored the increase in the overall duration. The average of 6.7 months in pre-notification for Phase I remedy cases resolved in the RTM ended in Q2 2019 represents an increase of 26 percent in comparison to the prior RTM period. This confirms the importance of the pre-notification phase during which companies engage in extensive discussions with the case team over the scope and detail of their filing, thus adding time far in excess of the statutory timetable.

New DAMITT Analysis Reveals Which Industries Account for the Most and Longest Significant Investigations in the US and EU

For the first time, DAMITT analyzed trends involving the relative frequency and average duration of significant investigations by industry.

This analysis revealed that the Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals industry accounted for the highest number of significant investigations in the U.S. and the second most in the EU between 2011 and H1 2019. Over the same period, the Industrial Products & Services sector accounted for the highest number of significant investigations in the EU and fourth most in the U.S. Meanwhile, the Financial Services industry represented the second-lowest number of significant investigations in both the U.S. and EU.

DAMITT also observed that significant investigations from 2011 to H1 2019 involving the Chemicals industry lasted the longest on average in the U.S. and the second longest in the EU for both Phase I remedy and Phase II cases, behind only the Energy sector. At the other end of the spectrum, significant investigations in the Transportation industry had the second-fastest U.S. average, the fastest Phase I remedy EU average, and the second-fastest Phase II EU average.

In the US, Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals Busiest Since 2011, Though Technology Industry Spiking Higher in H1 2019

The Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals industry has kept the U.S. antitrust agencies the busiest since 2011, accounting for about 28 percent of U.S. significant investigations. The Retail & Consumer Products and Technology industries are tied for second at 14 percent of significant investigations, followed closely by Industrial Products & Services at 13 percent.

Significant investigation levels by industry have been relatively consistent over time. In comparing the first half of the period tracked by DAMITT(2011-2014) with the second half (2015-H1 2019), DAMITT observes that only one industry (Chemicals) has seen a change in relative frequency of more than 3 percentage points between the two time periods. However, the Technology industry has seen a much more significant spike this year, accounting for about 40 percent of significant U.S. merger investigations in H1 2019 after remaining below 15 percent in each of the six prior calendar years.

Percent of Significant U.S. Merger Investigations by Industry (2011 - H1 2019)

The average duration of significant U.S. investigations has varied significantly by industry. Since 2011, Chemical industry mergers have taken the longest at 12.3 months on average. By comparison, significant investigations in the Financial Services and Transportation industries have taken only about half as long, averaging 6.0 and 6.4 months, respectively.

In the EU, DAMITT Observes Sectoral Variations for Phase I and II Clearances; 90% of Significant Investigations in the Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals Sector are Resolved in Phase I with Remedy Compared to only 25% in the Telecommunication Sector

Transactions in the Industrial Products & Services sector have accounted for the largest portion (32 percent) of EU significant investigations since 2011. This sector includes transactions in a number of sub-sectors that have witnessed significant enforcement activity in the EU, such as Metals and Minerals and Construction/Building Materials. The Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals industry had the second-highest level of activity, accounting for 12 percent of EU significant investigations. Retail & Consumer Products and Chemicals transactions tied for the third place, representing 11 percent of EU significant investigations.

Percent of Significant EU Merger Investigations by Industry (2011 – H1 2019)

The breakdown of the data between significant Phase I and Phase II investigations reveals differences in the proportion of Phase II investigations across industries. For instance, over the 2011-H1 2019 period tracked by DAMITT, 90 percent of significant EU merger investigations in the Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals sector were resolved in Phase I with remedies; whereas 75 percent of significant transactions in the Telecommunications sector underwent a Phase II investigation. The established decisional practice of the EU Commission in a number of sectors (e.g., Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals and Transportation) is likely a facilitating factor, allowing parties to identify potential issues and remedies early on.

Breakdown of EU Phase I Remedy vs. Phase II Cases by Industry (2011 – H1 2019)

A review of the average duration of significant Phase I and Phase II investigations by industry highlights substantial timing differences. The Energy sector accounted for the longest average duration in both Phase I and Phase II cases at 9.1 and 17.7 months, respectively.

Within the Industrial Products & Services category, cases involving Construction/Building Materials stood out for their great length, averaging 18.1 months in Phase II. In contrast, transactions in the Transportation sector accounted for the shortest average duration for significant Phase I investigations at only 5.0 months from announcement to clearance. The relative speed of significant investigations in this sector is further reflected in the average duration of Phase II proceedings; the 10.2-month average for Transportation is only slightly behind the shortest average duration of 10.1 months for Phase II proceedings in the Technology sector.

Phase II proceedings are on average roughly twice the length of Phase I reviews. However, the analysis shows that the increase in duration between Phase I and Phase II varies across industries. For instance, undergoing a Phase II review in the Technology sector adds 4.0 months to the review timetable; whereas the transactions in the Energy sector show the biggest jump with an average increase of 8.6 months.

Conclusion

While the circumstances of any individual transaction will naturally vary from the DAMITT averages, current statistics suggest that parties to the hypothetical average “significant” investigation subject to review only in the U.S. would have to plan on approximately a year for the agencies to investigate a transaction, although the duration of U.S. significant investigations appears to depend to a surprising extent on whether it is the FTC or the DOJ that conducts the investigation. Parties should further allow an additional five to seven months if they want to preserve their right to litigate an adverse agency decision.

Deal timetables for EU cases where the investigation is likely to proceed to Phase II need to allow for a lapse of around 14 months from announcement to clearance. If the investigation is likely to be resolved in Phase I with remedies, the deal timetable should allow for approximately eight months from announcement to a decision.

New DAMITT industry-based analysis demonstrates that the average duration of significant merger investigations varies by industry in both the U.S. and EU. In the U.S, the numbers show that significant investigations can take less than half as long on average in some industries (e.g., Financial Services) compared to others (e.g., Chemicals). In the EU, the duration of significant investigations depends naturally on the likelihood of clearance in Phase I versus Phase II. The existence of clear guidance in the form of long-standing published decisional practice in certain sectors significantly improves the prospect of merger clearance in Phase I.

Written by:

Dechert LLP
Contact
more
less

Dechert LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.